NationStates

Posted: **Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:28 pm**

I, a Field Marshal of The Black Hawks, hereby challenge Unibot to see who has a better 2012. This is not a declaration of war as raiders and defenders are always at war. This is an open challenge for Unibot and all fendas of UDL to accomplish more in 2012 than myself and The Black Hawks. This challenge is extended to all raiders and all fendas, but I figure putting faces to this would make things more interesting.

I think this game deserves a show this year, so let's give it to them. Let us bring the raider/fenda battle to the next level.

I promise I will bring my A game this year and bring raiding to greater heights. I hope fendas will do the same for defending.

Jakker versues Unibot.
2012.
Let's do this.

Posted: **Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:38 pm**

You get him Jak!

Posted: **Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:43 pm**

Should be interesting.

Posted: **Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:12 pm**

Mahaj wrote:Should be interesting.

Why? This 'challenge' is totally indefinable.

Posted: **Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:13 pm**

Eist wrote:
Mahaj wrote:Should be interesting.

Why? This 'challenge' is totally indefinable.

I know.

It was a polite thing to say.

Posted: **Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:09 pm**

Mahaj wrote:
Eist wrote:
Why? This 'challenge' is totally indefinable.

I know.

It was a polite thing to say.

haha well it is vague in a sense, yes.

But for myself and other raiders, it's saying raid bigger and better. For Uni and defenders, it's saying be alert and defend your hearts out.

Laugh now, but I promise this year will be interesting.

Posted: **Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:25 pm**

Um, since no one objectively "wins" in NS... the definition of what is successful is completely arbitrary and this could end very messy with both sides claiming victory. However, I can guarantee you, Jakker, you will have more raids than me next year and will be a more successful raider.

That having been said, I don't like to let people down. I accept your challenge. Have a good one, Jakker.

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:16 am**

Could hold a game of war, where each grabs a warzone and then tries to grab the warzone of the opposing party

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:37 am**

Unibot II wrote:Um, since no one objectively "wins" in NS... the definition of what is successful is completely arbitrary and ~~this could~~ will definitely end very messy with both sides claiming victory and arguing for weeks on end about it. However, I can guarantee you, Jakker, you will have more raids than me next year and will be a more successful raider.

That having been said, I don't like to let people down. I accept your challenge. Have a good one, Jakker.

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:38 am**

Unibot II wrote:Um, since no one objectively "wins" in NS [...]

The quote in your signature argues otherwise.

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:06 am**

This should be fun.

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:26 am**

No, this should be boring. Both side will claim victory and the only thing its done its put Uni and Jak as "Faces" in raiding/defending.

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:58 am**

Crazy girl wrote:Could hold a game of war, where each grabs a warzone and then tries to grab the warzone of the opposing party

That would be fun.

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:01 am**

Wait wait wait.

Jacker Verses Unibot?

There once was a raider named Jakker
Who claimed that "I am not a slacker!"
And, proving that claim
Logged into the game
And posted as a talking-smacker.

...oh, never mind, "versues."

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:02 pm**

Drop Your Pants wrote:No, this should be boring. Both side will claim victory and the only thing its done its put Uni and Jak as "Faces" in raiding/defending.

I didn't do this for there to be a "winner". Although it's true that both sides will claim "victory" when everything is all said and done, winning isn't my prime goal. My prime goal is for both sides to do more. It's hard for raiders to get a lot of numbers for an update raid. Well then, I challenge us to try and make that happen. It's hard for defenders to liberate region with a lot of endorsements, but I challenge them to do it. However, if the defenders truly do some great things, I will be the first to tell them.

This game could use some real entertainment. I know this challenge is out there, but I want to give people something to talk about.

Also, since the Olympics are this year, maybe we can set up some events such as the one CG suggested?

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:33 pm**

Mahaj wrote:
Crazy girl wrote:Could hold a game of war, where each grabs a warzone and then tries to grab the warzone of the opposing party

That would be fun.

It's like our own NS capture-the-flag game! Could make for a nice pastime while on NationStates. Or a nice judge of this little... well... big competition.

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:17 pm**

Nexexen wrote:
Mahaj wrote:That would be fun.

It's like our own NS capture-the-flag game! Could make for a nice pastime while on NationStates. Or a nice judge of this little... well... big competition.

The Flag

Capture The Flag.

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:30 pm**

Mahaj wrote:
Nexexen wrote:It's like our own NS capture-the-flag game! Could make for a nice pastime while on NationStates. Or a nice judge of this little... well... big competition.

The Flag

Capture The Flag.

Dibs. Should've made the founder non-executive.

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:33 pm**

Mallorea and Riva wrote:
Mahaj wrote:The Flag

Capture The Flag.

Dibs. Should've made the founder non-executive.

No. This way I can prevent a refounding and keep the game going.

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:01 pm**

Or we could use the official Warzones?

You get a point for each day you hold each Warzones. So if you claim 3 Warzones you get 3 points a day.

Edit Jakker: I'm sure Unibot contributes much more to NS, he's also one of the biggest faces in the WA. By your total non presence there doesn't you to automatically lose since you aren't getting the most out of the game? Unless you dominate the RP forums....

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:41 pm**

Drop Your Pants wrote:No, this should be boring. Both side will claim victory and the only thing its done its put Uni and Jak as "Faces" in raiding/defending.

DYP wins!

No, *srsly*, the Hawks will own the Bots. Go Hawks!

lol, feels like some kind of (awful) sports game...

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:51 pm**

North East Somerset wrote:
Drop Your Pants wrote:No, this should be boring. Both side will claim victory and the only thing its done its put Uni and Jak as "Faces" in raiding/defending.

DYP wins!

No, *srsly*, the Hawks will own the Bots. Go Hawks!

lol, feels like some kind of (awful) sports game...

Well you're a terrible basketball team. We don't exist, we can be however good we want to be!

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:25 pm**

The warzones is a good idea but what will really happen is a small group from each side will actually participate and the rest will keep doing the same old stuff. If a lot of raiders join in the games then defenders will take a break, if a lot of defenders join in then raiders will go after a high value target and ruin the fun

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:26 pm**

Drop Your Pants wrote:The warzones is a good idea but what will really happen is a small group from each side will actually participate and the rest will keep doing the same old stuff. If a lot of raiders join in the games then defenders will take a break, if a lot of defenders join in then raiders will go after a high value target and ruin the fun

You're not gonna trick me into leaving my flag. It's mine now.

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:30 pm**

-Carta- wrote:
Unibot II wrote:Um, since no one objectively "wins" in NS [...]

The quote in your signature argues otherwise.

My thoughts exactly...

NationStates

Jakker Versus Unibot

Jakker Versus Unibot