NATION

PASSWORD

Neutral Ground - an Open Discussion Thread

Talk about regional management and politics, raider/defender gameplay, and other game-related matters.
Not a roleplaying forum.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Stalker Queen
Envoy
 
Posts: 227
Founded: Jun 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Stalker Queen » Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:01 pm

Ridersyl wrote:I'm about to get wintered so hard. Anything I planned gameplay-wise this weekend just got owned by mother nature.
Does this mean mother nature is a defender?!

Be safe! o/
Any statements made from this nation are representative of the personal views of the player behind it, and should not be taken as the views of any region or organisation they may be part of.
Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
Retired.

User avatar
Ever-Wandering Souls
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7005
Founded: Jan 01, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ever-Wandering Souls » Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:53 pm

Ridersyl wrote:I'm about to get wintered so hard. Anything I planned gameplay-wise this weekend just got owned by mother nature.
Does this mean mother nature is a defender?!

Mother nature is a counter-raider, a filthy retagger, covering the WFE of the world with white shit!
Proud Raider; General of The Black Hawks, Ret.
TG me anytime; I'm always happy to talk about anything!

The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258

Misley wrote:
Hobbesistan wrote:Don't think I understand the question.
The color or what?..

Jesus, Hobbes, it's 2015. You can't just call someone "the color".

Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative

How Do I Telegram API?

Omnis delenda est.

User avatar
CreepyCut
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 162
Founded: Feb 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby CreepyCut » Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:33 pm

Ridersyl wrote:I'm about to get wintered so hard. Anything I planned gameplay-wise this weekend just got owned by mother nature.
Does this mean mother nature is a defender?!


Mother Nature is the entity that has been watching over you since the beginning...fear not for everything is justified. You have been prevented from your plans because Nature knows there are greater things in store for you. It's all about timing.

And if I am wrong and you are not destined for greatness, then it doesn't matter for greatness is overrated.
-{Ash Rosekastell, founder and King of Insanity and Flowers in Asylum}-

User avatar
Pollaetorian
Envoy
 
Posts: 306
Founded: Oct 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Pollaetorian » Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:19 pm

Why does TSP always change forum?

Why does Balder always change flags?

*ponders*
Helping you make the right decisions | The Pollaetorian Guard: Arbiters of Democracy | Liberating the proles from the polls
<Mall> Codger is only an enemy to those who dislike polls.

User avatar
Ever-Wandering Souls
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7005
Founded: Jan 01, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ever-Wandering Souls » Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:42 pm

Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Gameplay has been slower recently, IMHO. No masses of angry roleplayers stomping around, less contentious arguing between factions than usual, relative peace and quiet....

Alright, fess up, who's not doing their job right? :lol:


Riftey wrote:Hopefully it's not Misley :P


Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:....and there goes the peace and quiet.



I wasn't wrong.
Last edited by Ever-Wandering Souls on Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Proud Raider; General of The Black Hawks, Ret.
TG me anytime; I'm always happy to talk about anything!

The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258

Misley wrote:
Hobbesistan wrote:Don't think I understand the question.
The color or what?..

Jesus, Hobbes, it's 2015. You can't just call someone "the color".

Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative

How Do I Telegram API?

Omnis delenda est.

User avatar
The Bruce
Diplomat
 
Posts: 641
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby The Bruce » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:02 am

Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Gameplay has been slower recently, IMHO. No masses of angry roleplayers stomping around, less contentious arguing between factions than usual, relative peace and quiet....

Alright, fess up, who's not doing their job right? :lol:


There has been a distinct lack of coups in the game created regions. How long has it been since someone tried to burn one down?

Probably the quickest way to create some drama in NationStates is to announce the creation of a new feeder region for some jaded cosmopolitans to squabble over, ensuring that no grassroots culture ever has the chance to emerge there.

User avatar
McMasterdonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 958
Founded: Apr 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby McMasterdonia » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:26 am

The Bruce wrote:
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Gameplay has been slower recently, IMHO. No masses of angry roleplayers stomping around, less contentious arguing between factions than usual, relative peace and quiet....

Alright, fess up, who's not doing their job right? :lol:


There has been a distinct lack of coups in the game created regions. How long has it been since someone tried to burn one down?

Probably the quickest way to create some drama in NationStates is to announce the creation of a new feeder region for some jaded cosmopolitans to squabble over, ensuring that no grassroots culture ever has the chance to emerge there.


The West Pacific coup wasn't that long ago. But it didn't last very long either.
Pollaetorian wrote:Why does TSP always change forum?

Why does Balder always change flags?

*ponders*

I was thinking that just the other day too. TEP has also changed their flag so many times.

User avatar
Flanderlion
Minister
 
Posts: 2191
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Flanderlion » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:28 am

The Bruce wrote:
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Gameplay has been slower recently, IMHO. No masses of angry roleplayers stomping around, less contentious arguing between factions than usual, relative peace and quiet....

Alright, fess up, who's not doing their job right? :lol:


There has been a distinct lack of coups in the game created regions. How long has it been since someone tried to burn one down?

Probably the quickest way to create some drama in NationStates is to announce the creation of a new feeder region for some jaded cosmopolitans to squabble over, ensuring that no grassroots culture ever has the chance to emerge there.

I'd be for a second Rejected Realms, except TRR2 could only be ejected to by the original TRR, and no one could move there. It would create some fairly interesting gameplay dynamics. I'm not sure if TRR's population justifies a second TRR though, there need to be a few coups and mass ejections to make that a possibility.
As always, I'm representing myself.
Information
Wishlist

User avatar
McMasterdonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 958
Founded: Apr 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby McMasterdonia » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:46 am

Flanderlion wrote:
The Bruce wrote:
There has been a distinct lack of coups in the game created regions. How long has it been since someone tried to burn one down?

Probably the quickest way to create some drama in NationStates is to announce the creation of a new feeder region for some jaded cosmopolitans to squabble over, ensuring that no grassroots culture ever has the chance to emerge there.

I'd be for a second Rejected Realms, except TRR2 could only be ejected to by the original TRR, and no one could move there. It would create some fairly interesting gameplay dynamics. I'm not sure if TRR's population justifies a second TRR though, there need to be a few coups and mass ejections to make that a possibility.


Interesting idea. What would it be called? The Trash Can? xD

The Delegate of the RR would be the one ultimately empowered to decide who governed that region though, and people may go overboard in TRR just hoping to be ejected to the other region :P

User avatar
Flanderlion
Minister
 
Posts: 2191
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Flanderlion » Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:23 am

McMasterdonia wrote:
Flanderlion wrote:I'd be for a second Rejected Realms, except TRR2 could only be ejected to by the original TRR, and no one could move there. It would create some fairly interesting gameplay dynamics. I'm not sure if TRR's population justifies a second TRR though, there need to be a few coups and mass ejections to make that a possibility.


Interesting idea. What would it be called? The Trash Can? xD

The Delegate of the RR would be the one ultimately empowered to decide who governed that region though, and people may go overboard in TRR just hoping to be ejected to the other region :P

Alcatraz, Azkaban, you could go crazy. It doesn't share a theme with the other sinkers (I just searched for a post I saw a while back where Reploid had a number for TRR type regions, but after a long fruitless search and a lot of red herrings I've left it for now), so any sort of theme works, preferably something to do with 'the worst of the worst' type thing. I'm for nations to be able to leave the 'Trash Can', because I'm not too sure about nations being stuck in one place, but nations shouldn't under any circumstance be able to move there of their own choice, even if they have moved from it earlier.
As always, I'm representing myself.
Information
Wishlist

User avatar
Xoriet
Minister
 
Posts: 2046
Founded: Jun 08, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Xoriet » Mon Jan 25, 2016 7:42 am

Flanderlion wrote:Alcatraz, Azkaban, you could go crazy. It doesn't share a theme with the other sinkers (I just searched for a post I saw a while back where Reploid had a number for TRR type regions, but after a long fruitless search and a lot of red herrings I've left it for now), so any sort of theme works, preferably something to do with 'the worst of the worst' type thing. I'm for nations to be able to leave the 'Trash Can', because I'm not too sure about nations being stuck in one place, but nations shouldn't under any circumstance be able to move there of their own choice, even if they have moved from it earlier.

That would be...fun...minus the usual scramble to control a new GCR. :p And as long as they arrange to be ejected, they certainly can move there of their own choice. It might be a more inconvenient scramble than usual, but a scramble nonetheless.
Senator of Diplomatic Affairs of the New Pacific Order

This flame we carry into battle
A fading memory
This light will conquer the darkness
Shining bright for all to see

User avatar
Severisen
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 492
Founded: Mar 15, 2012
Father Knows Best State

Postby Severisen » Mon Jan 25, 2016 7:47 am

Not even. I'd imagine whoever TRR wanted to control it would control it. It would sit empty except those nations. Defenders would never send raiders or random puppets there. And if you can leave, what's the point? :P
<mcmasterdonia> Ex-TBH dudes get all the NS girls.

Mallorea and Riva wrote:Yeah but no one here can read. Literacy is a tool used by fendas, like IRC or morals.

Sichuan Pepper wrote:Should I be worried that Mall said he wanted to invade my region?
Member of the Cult of the Overgoat.

Married to my best friends Xoriet and Astarial
Father to Ramaeus, Sylvia, Greyghost, Bachtendekuppen, Liliarchy, Jar, Cookie. (And Guy)
Former: Everything
Current: Nowhere man.
Past, Present, and Future: Nobody.


User avatar
Flanderlion
Minister
 
Posts: 2191
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Flanderlion » Mon Jan 25, 2016 7:51 am

Severisen wrote:Not even. I'd imagine whoever TRR wanted to control it would control it. It would sit empty except those nations. Defenders would never send raiders or random puppets there. And if you can leave, what's the point? :P

I've got a few ideas regarding that, but I'll sleep on it so others can weigh in (or change the subject completely, this is a neutral thread).
As always, I'm representing myself.
Information
Wishlist

User avatar
King Nephmir II
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 396
Founded: Jun 04, 2015
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby King Nephmir II » Mon Jan 25, 2016 7:51 am

Nations could be stuck there for a set amount of time before being allowed to leave. Or it could cost influence to leave. :P
SC Resolutions
SC#165 | SC#173
_
_
Nephmir - King of The Eternal Order
The Dark One, wielder of the Dark One Dagger

King Nephmir II - King Nephmir III

User avatar
Xoriet
Minister
 
Posts: 2046
Founded: Jun 08, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Xoriet » Mon Jan 25, 2016 7:54 am

You people. Are you constructing a literal sinker where all is lost forever or a region? :lol:
Senator of Diplomatic Affairs of the New Pacific Order

This flame we carry into battle
A fading memory
This light will conquer the darkness
Shining bright for all to see

User avatar
Severisen
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 492
Founded: Mar 15, 2012
Father Knows Best State

Postby Severisen » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:04 am

Welcome to the Hotel California.

RIP Glenn Frey
<mcmasterdonia> Ex-TBH dudes get all the NS girls.

Mallorea and Riva wrote:Yeah but no one here can read. Literacy is a tool used by fendas, like IRC or morals.

Sichuan Pepper wrote:Should I be worried that Mall said he wanted to invade my region?
Member of the Cult of the Overgoat.

Married to my best friends Xoriet and Astarial
Father to Ramaeus, Sylvia, Greyghost, Bachtendekuppen, Liliarchy, Jar, Cookie. (And Guy)
Former: Everything
Current: Nowhere man.
Past, Present, and Future: Nobody.


User avatar
McMasterdonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 958
Founded: Apr 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby McMasterdonia » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:15 am

Xoriet wrote:
Flanderlion wrote:Alcatraz, Azkaban, you could go crazy. It doesn't share a theme with the other sinkers (I just searched for a post I saw a while back where Reploid had a number for TRR type regions, but after a long fruitless search and a lot of red herrings I've left it for now), so any sort of theme works, preferably something to do with 'the worst of the worst' type thing. I'm for nations to be able to leave the 'Trash Can', because I'm not too sure about nations being stuck in one place, but nations shouldn't under any circumstance be able to move there of their own choice, even if they have moved from it earlier.

That would be...fun...minus the usual scramble to control a new GCR. :p And as long as they arrange to be ejected, they certainly can move there of their own choice. It might be a more inconvenient scramble than usual, but a scramble nonetheless.

All under the glorious control of the rejected realms. I wonder if it would put TRR more at risk - essentially if you gained control of TRR you would also gain control of a second GCR :P
King Nephmir II wrote:Nations could be stuck there for a set amount of time before being allowed to leave. Or it could cost influence to leave. :P

People would just let their nations CTE, I'd think. Or the ones that stayed would only be there for the control.
Severisen wrote:Not even. I'd imagine whoever TRR wanted to control it would control it. It would sit empty except those nations. Defenders would never send raiders or random puppets there. And if you can leave, what's the point? :P

Pretty much. I think this would lead to people getting pretty close to breaking site rules on the TRR rmb for example, or otherwise driving TRR natives mad, out of the hope that they would be ejected. Sounds like a bad idea :P

User avatar
Solorni
Minister
 
Posts: 3024
Founded: Sep 04, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Solorni » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:33 am

Pollaetorian wrote:Why does Balder always change flags?

I actually have no clue. Pretty sure NES introduced the most recent flag, but then he tells me he never liked it that much. Oh and the NBO flag was a joke of course. There has been a chorus of people who have wanted to have a democratic convention for a flag, which is currently what is happening.
Lovely Queen of Balder
Proud Delegate of WALL

Lucky Number 13

User avatar
Zaolat
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1426
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Zaolat » Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:43 pm

Xoriet wrote:You people. Are you constructing a literal sinker where all is lost forever or a region? :lol:

Meh I'd go with End of The Line
Former Delegate of the Rejected Realms - TRR Forum | Pharaoh Emeritus of Osiris - OFO Forum
Guide to the Gameplay Forum | NS Discord Links | One Stop Rules Shop
Max Barry on The Legend of Zelda
<Zaolat>: maxbarry: Have you played any Legend of Zelda video game?
<maxbarry>: I have NEVER played Zelda, I know that is shocking
Victim of the Flag Thief

User avatar
Benevolent Aurors
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Sep 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Benevolent Aurors » Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:34 pm

Flanderlion wrote:Alcatraz, Azkaban, you could go crazy. It doesn't share a theme with the other sinkers (I just searched for a post I saw a while back where Reploid had a number for TRR type regions, but after a long fruitless search and a lot of red herrings I've left it for now), so any sort of theme works, preferably something to do with 'the worst of the worst' type thing. I'm for nations to be able to leave the 'Trash Can', because I'm not too sure about nations being stuck in one place, but nations shouldn't under any circumstance be able to move there of their own choice, even if they have moved from it earlier.

Azkaban you say? I approve the creation of this sinker solely for housing the nations that I eject in the name of defending innocent nations/regions. Of course, someone will have to take over the role of ejecting the dangerous nations of the world as I would have to rule over this wretched hive of scum and villainy.

User avatar
Numero Capitan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 633
Founded: Sep 27, 2007
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Numero Capitan » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:27 pm

McMasterdonia wrote:
Flanderlion wrote:I'd be for a second Rejected Realms, except TRR2 could only be ejected to by the original TRR, and no one could move there. It would create some fairly interesting gameplay dynamics. I'm not sure if TRR's population justifies a second TRR though, there need to be a few coups and mass ejections to make that a possibility.


Interesting idea. What would it be called? The Trash Can? xD

The Delegate of the RR would be the one ultimately empowered to decide who governed that region though, and people may go overboard in TRR just hoping to be ejected to the other region :P


Ultimate Dumb-bum Reject Land gets my vote
Minister of Defense, 00000 A World Power
Minister of Intelligence, FRA
Potato General
Senator and Attorney General, Europeia
Minister of Security and Minister of Justice, The South Pacific
Minister of War, Fidelia
Royal Council, The Last Kingdom
Crown Prince, Unknown and The Brotherhood of Blood
Delegate, REDACTED
REDACTED and REDACTED, REDACTED
REDACTED, REDACTED REDACTED
REDACTED, dont be nosey

User avatar
Crazy girl
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 5720
Founded: Antiquity
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Crazy girl » Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:01 pm

Or Hades.

User avatar
Siberian Districts
Attaché
 
Posts: 83
Founded: Jul 24, 2014
Corporate Bordello

Postby Siberian Districts » Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:26 pm

Crazy girl wrote:Or Hades.


Too much like Osiris.
I do like Numero's idea of "Ultimate Dumb-bum Reject Land" though. It's nice and professional.
Siberian
South Pacific Special Forces


User avatar
Mad-eye Jack
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Nov 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Mad-eye Jack » Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:29 pm

Severisen wrote:Not even. I'd imagine whoever TRR wanted to control it would control it. It would sit empty except those nations. Defenders would never send raiders or random puppets there. And if you can leave, what's the point? :P


And what would even be that great about controlling a region where it is either a bunch of inactive folks or folks even TRR found to be a nuisance, or a region that is essentially a UCR that is gate kept by whoever controls TRR.

Of course if I can send people to Azkaban, sign me up
Headmaster of Hogwarts

Pretty good Defender. Telegram me if you want to take the plunge.

User avatar
Mousebumples
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 8604
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Mousebumples » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:06 pm

Crazy girl wrote:Or Hades.

I vote Persephone. Haven't we always said we need a female-named GCR?
Leader of the Mouse-a-rific Mousetastic Moderator Mousedom of Mousebumples
Past WA Delegate for Europeia & Monkey Island
Proud Member of UNOG
I'm an "adorably marvelous NatSov" - Mallorea and Riva
GA Resolutions (sorted by category) | Why Repeal? | Reppy's Sig Workshop

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Gameplay

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Lord Dominator

Advertisement

Remove ads