King Alexander wrote:The Congress of Sovereigns from day one was an organization built to prop a dead LKE up.
The idea that the CoS was created to "prop a dead LKE up" is absurd. In the month when the CoS was created, the LKE forums had nearly 2,000 posts: now there are indeed some regions which can boast much higher levels, but around 65 posts per day is not "dead" by any means. It's more than reasonable.
In any case, how exactly would founding CoS have injected life into a "dead" region? CoS is a multilateral alliance; not an activity initiative. The purposes of creating the CoS were external, not internal. What's more, while the LKE clearly benefited from refocusing its foreign affairs, the other regions had the opportunity to benefit from being drawn into world affairs to a greater extent than they were previously. The potential benefits were mutual.
If you did not believe that at the time, you should not have entered into it, but no one deceived you as to its purpose.
King Alexander wrote:Yes, KGB conducted a raid and LKE provided 3 pliers of the operation the fussed about it going on too long.
You are referring KGB's invasion of The Eternal Realm. There were actually five LKE units in that operation, not three. Of course, even this figure was not our highest turnout in the life of the CoS (at one point we had over 20 units deployed), but we did not anticipate the need to increase deployment levels as our strong advice, based on our extensive experience of military occupations, was that the operation should be brought to a close as quickly as possible.
The reason we wanted the operation to be brought to a close was because the number of endorsements (partly due to other ongoing operations involving our partners and the lack of pre-planning to arrange other allies to support) was extremely low, making it very vulnerable to a 'defender' liberation.
The Eternal Realm was far from the only operation where forces from different CoS regions were deployed in the same mission
King Alexander wrote: There is no intelligence sharing, no joint military ops, not even talks of cultural endeavors.
Unlike the United Imperial Armed Forces, which was a military union, CoS was not meant to necessarily facilitate joint military operations more than any other type of alliance. The purpose was long-term growth in diplomatic soft power. CoS might not have offered tangible benefits, but it was meaningful.
As the statement makes quite clear, George Hanover VI indicated that citizens from TEP (not necessarily the government) were present in the conversation in which he alleges it was stated that Albion had used the LKE's World Assembly Delegate to gather intelligence on LKE. The specific reason why this evidence is recounted is to question the credibility of George Hanover VI's claims, given the unlikelihood of such a disclosure in that setting.
No criticism of TEP is in any sense implied from referring to the fact that George Hanover VI said its members were present when it was alleged Albion spied on LKE. That is just a factual account of what was stated. We doubt the account is true and, even if so, why then would TEP be responsible?
People mention regions in passing all the time without criticising them. There is no reason for offence to be taken.
There is no reason why it would be wrong for TEP members to be in that conversation. An off-hand-reference to TEP is not intended as a criticism.
King Alexander wrote:There are a great many things I question about this statement as well. He questioned my involvement with this and I told him that I was speaking with friends on NS. He inquired who, I refused to give up names but I told him I have friends all over NS and said that generally I keep to friends with regions I know and I listed the regions that I have friends in as he wanted so badly to know. Now I realize why he wanted to know and just how quickly words can be turned around to fit his purpose.
The reason for enquiring about this conversation was to investigate your claim that the LKE World Assembly Delegate had been an Albion spy.
You said this was revealed by Albion members in this conversation.
Surely knowing the identities of these people is therefore crucial to confirming or denying the veracity of the claims?
King Alexander wrote:TEP should have never even been involved in this. He told me saying I have friends in a couple sinker and feeders that I talk to and trust with everything as TEP being involved which is not at all the case. the implication of KGB is one thing but Onder crossed a line by pulling other regions in to this mess. This matter is a Congress of Sovereigns matter and should have never extended beyond that.
Onder's need to pull everything ever said in to a statement bashing a region that left in near total silence because of his butt hurt is why TEP is involved. I however apologize to TEP and everyone else for this becoming an issue, I will take the blame and I will tell you up front that the context in which the statement was made is not at all the context in which I spoke on skype. If there is anything I can do, please do not hesitate to inform me.
You stated the conversation with people from TEP, Albion and Osiris; that is what the statement reports.
It is no reflection on those regions. No one has suggested that they acted improperly. I quite honestly fail to see the issue here.
Cormac Stark wrote:But not the Emperor of The LKE, who actually named TEP, without providing any evidence or context for his claims that the King of KGB named "members from TEP"?
His precise statmene was that "Not with Zack. It was with myself and a couple of friends I have in Ablion along with some people from KGB, TEP, and Osiris", in answer to my question about whether the conversation, where he learnt what he claims he did, was with the World Assembly Delegate himself.
There was no claim that he "named" members from TEP; the statement merely said that he indicated that individuals in TEP were present. People from all sorts of regions are present in all sorts of conversations all the time. No one is suggesting that any of this involves impropriety on their part.
Why would any of this need elaboration? The simple point is that is the setting in which the KGB King claims that the conversation took place. Whether or not is true is another matter, and the statement indicates not, but either way, TEP as a region is not involved and no one suggested that it was.