
Advertisement

by Eldorado Poe » Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:10 pm


by Evil Wolf » Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:58 pm

Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.

by Letoilenoir » Sat Sep 24, 2011 5:11 pm
Evil Wolf wrote:I could start that now if it helps any.


by The Bruce » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:51 pm
Mahaj wrote:Improving Wordiness wrote:
![]()
If you have a complaint about TITO, man up and use TG system where I can smack you down in private.
Its true. Similarly, i'd hope you don't use the FRA as a model, or the UDL. Because defenders are different.
now as to which one works the best... thats up for debate...



by Eldorado Poe » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:10 pm

by Evil Wolf » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:22 pm
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.

by 94 block » Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:49 am

by The Murtunian Tribes » Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:23 am
94 block wrote:not to be putting my own team down but i did find this interesting
http://conservative.nationstates.net/pa ... 2/start=26
thats the WASC resolution that condemned Unknown
And its based around forum crashing, seems like that is more common than we think.
so in that case, unknown may be raided 6 yrs from now by the fendahs for revenge.

by Mahaj » Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:00 am
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations

by Tikal Wolf » Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:25 am

by Kshrlmnt » Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:41 am
MENE, MENE, TEKEL, PARSIN
This is what these words mean:
Mene: God has numbered the days of your reign and brought it to an end.
Tekel: You have been weighed on the scales and found wanting.
Peres: Your kingdom has been divided and given to the Medes and Persians.
...That very night Belshazzar, king of the Babylonians, was slain, and Darius the Mede took over the kingdom, at the age of sixty-two.


by Unibot II » Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:55 am
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
General Halcones wrote:Look up to Unibot as an example.

by Thorgills » Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:34 am

by Evil Wolf » Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:54 am
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.

by Frattastan » Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:08 pm

Drop Your Pants wrote:I think raiders are cute, the way they think they're big and scary people who threaten others :)

by Commander Halcones » Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:23 pm
Unibot II wrote:I did not lie in my response to Sir Lans, Kshrlmnt. Justice will not be abandoned.

by Mahaj » Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:30 pm
Thorgills wrote:Justice was abandoned as soon as UDL allied themselves with the scum of NS. If any raider org did what TPC was responsible for, you would be posting essay after essay about it. Instead you guys pull a coy stunt where you hold no accountability for who you defend.
Not on my watch.
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations

by Goobergunchia » Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:32 pm
New Sark wrote:Woot! Victory! This is what happens fendas, blood for blood. This is a sign of things to come. Our forces will roll out over the founderless region-ohhh lunch time.


by Evil Wolf » Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:54 pm
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Tahar Joblis » Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:00 pm
Tikal Wolf wrote:The forum deletion has received an apology on behalf of unknown, even though the deletion wasn't authorized, directed, or even suggested by the O.R.I..
What I don't understand is why a raider, of all people, would go around digging this up - and doing so poorly informed.![]()
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=131269
The Executive Council and Command Staff of the Red Liberty Alliance hereby condemn the actions taken in regards to the destruction of the Invaders Boards. We consider these actions to be the work of individuals and not reflective of the RLA as a whole. The Executive Committee and Command Staff of the RLA had no prior knowledge that agents of the RLAI would be carrying out this attack; nor did they possess any knowledge as to the details surrounding the attack until after it was over.
The EC and Command Staff also commit to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of the attack, the results of which will be made public. As part of the investigative process, we recommend an outside observer will take part in the investigation. Lanier, of the West Pacific, has agreed to act as this observer. He would examine the same evidence as the investigators and issue his own impartial report on the facts. At the conclusion of this investigation, the investigative panel will issue a recommendation on how to act on the findings which will then be submitted to the Central Soviet for consideration.
In the mean time, we urge everyone to be calm and wait for the facts to come about before issuing any judgements of their own.
Kshrlmnt wrote:A year ago today, Unknown was condemned for the forum destruction committed by one of its operatives, Rougiers.
There is little to say that has not already been said. Rougiers completed the task assigned to him, to gather IPs and other information for our own region's security. Forum destruction was not part of his assignment.
Unknown judged Rougiers based on the success of his assigned mission, not his actions after its completion. This judgment was never meant to be an encouragement of such tactics, and hopefully has not been interpreted as such.
But on the anniversary of our condemnation, we wish to reiterate: We do not, nor will we, encourage forum attacks like this. They will not be done in our name or on our behalf.
To The Council of Narnia and the Crusaders of Justice: We are truly sorry for what part we played in your loss, and for our unsympathetic response to your legitimate complaints. In the end, we too trusted Rougiers too much, and were nearly destroyed by him. Our loss was not the same as yours, but served as a wakeup call--though none should have been needed.
The deletions and bannings perpetrated by Rougiers never should have happened. They, and our response to them, are inextricably tied to our region's past, but they are not who we are or who we want to be. There is nothing we can do to change the past; we can only learn from it, and offer our humble apologies.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Grace Wellesley Thayer
Advertisement