NationStates

The World Assembly,

NOTING that a second condemnation of NAZI EUROPE, which addresses the region's idiosyncratic faults rather than an only an ideology referenced in the region's name, has been passed by the World Assembly,

FURTHER NOTING that there have already been five previous attempts to repeal the original condemnation of NAZI EUROPE in the past and fearing that, if no compromise is made between the large number of WA members calling for a condemnation of NAZI EUROPE and the members of the SC that are unwilling to allow WASC legislation to condemn a region for its ideology alone, the conflict over SC Resolution #3 could continue indefinitely,

UNDERSTANDING that having two condemnations of the same region is fairly redundant, and that, since the second condemnation is of much higher quality and is much more relevant to the history of the region that it condemns than the first condemnation, it is only practical to nullify the former condemnation,

ITERATING that it recognizes the poor quality of the first condemnation of NAZI EUROPE and further noting that the original condemnation of NAZI EUROPE sets a precedent of condemning ideologies, or processes of thought,

BELIEVING that, while certain ideologies may be frowned upon by the majority of the WA Member nations of the world, it is not the right or the purpose of the World Assembly to infringe upon people's right to think for themselves,

FIRMLY ASSERTING that the World Assembly is a body that normally works for the spread of freedom and therefore must not inhibit the right to freedom of thought,

RECOGNIZING that, even if the members of the World Assembly would like to abuse the institution's powers by using the WASC to condemn a process of thought, the constant repeal attempts of WASC Resolution #3 are an incredible waste of the WA's time and that the World Assembly will have spent over two and a half weeks of voting time on repeals of WASC Resolution #3 by the end of the vote on this repeal,

FURTHER RECOGNIZING that the representatives from many WA nations are getting terribly, terribly sick of all this and would really like for it to end, please, if that isn't too much to ask,

HEREBY REPEALS WASC Resolution #3, "Condemn NAZI EUROPE."

Defendingg wrote:For the love of God let this pass.

They're already talking in NE about the free publicity of having a second condemn.

Sedgistan wrote:It did. The drafting thread was here: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=81277

EDIT: In fact, it appears you even posted in that thread...

Ethel mermania wrote:THat was the overview thread, where it was explained what the writers point was. I did not see this go in as a proposal, in queue and vote. Which i thought was the required process.

Sedgistan wrote:

Ethel mermania wrote:THat was the overview thread, where it was explained what the writers point was. I did not see this go in as a proposal, in queue and vote. Which i thought was the required process.

I can assure you that it did go through the usual process of submission & approval by delegates.

Sedgistan wrote:

Ethel mermania wrote:THat was the overview thread, where it was explained what the writers point was. I did not see this go in as a proposal, in queue and vote. Which i thought was the required process.

I can assure you that it did go through the usual process of submission & approval by delegates.

Ethel mermania wrote:would you be so kind to show us where?

Ethel mermania wrote:

Sedgistan wrote:I can assure you that it did go through the usual process of submission & approval by delegates.

would you be so kind to show us where?

Warzone Codger wrote:We abstain.

We get the your goal. We don't like the repeal reasons.

This thread(s) has been quite tame actually, it seemed as if everyone was sick of arguing others, since we know everyone's points. Laos Refugees excepting, but it's expected as they are the one keep getting focused.

Mahaj WA Seat wrote:

Warzone Codger wrote:We abstain.

We get the your goal. We don't like the repeal reasons.

This thread(s) has been quite tame actually, it seemed as if everyone was sick of arguing others, since we know everyone's points. Laos Refugees excepting, but it's expected as they are the one keep getting focused.

we've only debated it hundreds of times.

Ethel mermania wrote:

Sedgistan wrote:It did. The drafting thread was here: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=81277

EDIT: In fact, it appears you even posted in that thread...

THat was the overview thread, where it was explained what the writers point was. . .

A mean old man wrote:. . .

I will be making separate threads for each proposal during their times in the queue/at vote (hopefully). This thread will serve as the drafting thread for both of them. If you'd like to see something changed, you'd best speak up now.

. . .

Brakiachi wrote:Gentlemen and Ladies;


Just how much longer do we intend to hold debate on these same issues over and over?

Brakiachi wrote:Gentlemen and Ladies;


Just how much longer do we intend to hold debate on these same issues over and over?

Defendingg wrote:If this passes, = more repeals gogogogo

if this fails, = more repeals gogogogo

Austin Setzer wrote:HONESTLY JUST GET THE MODS TO DELETE THAT REGION! NO ONE EXCEPT RIGHT WING NAZIS ARE GONNA GO THERE!

Austin Setzer wrote:HONESTLY JUST GET THE MODS TO DELETE THAT REGION! NO ONE EXCEPT RIGHT WING NAZIS ARE GONNA GO THERE!

Echolilia wrote:

Defendingg wrote:If this passes, = more repeals gogogogo

if this fails, = more repeals gogogogo

Fixed that for you.

At least that's what I foresee, with all due respect to AMOM.

A mean old man wrote:

Brakiachi wrote:Gentlemen and Ladies;


Just how much longer do we intend to hold debate on these same issues over and over?

No longer, which is why I've taken these bold measures.

By voting against this repeal, you're simply supporting further discussion of these issues.