by Quadnairia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:39 am
by Hellestia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:01 pm
by Holy Roman Confederate » Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:18 pm
by Charlotte Ryberg » Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:36 pm
by Grays Harbor » Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:51 pm
by Meekinos » Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:26 pm
by Wolffbaden » Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:58 pm
by Bears Armed » Wed Aug 25, 2010 4:14 am
by Quadrimmina » Wed Aug 25, 2010 4:40 am
by Bears Armed » Wed Aug 25, 2010 5:38 am
Quadrimmina wrote:The Republic of Quadrimmina expresses concerns that not allowing WA nations to develop and test nuclear weapons will lead to a disparity between the quality of nuclear technology in WA nations and non-WA nations. This would render WA nations unable to defend themselves. We will not allow this. AGAINST.
by Quadnairia » Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:26 am
by New La Habana » Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:28 am
Quadnairia wrote:Nuclear Weapon Test Ban
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Significant
The World Assembly
NOTING the danger presented by nuclear fallout
CONCERNED about the testing and use of nuclear weapons
HEREBY RESOLVES that all nations shall prohibit, prevent, and not carry out nuclear explosions, test or otherwise, at any place within their jurisdiction or control in the atmosphere, outer space, underwater, or in any other environment if an explosion would send radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion;
FURTHER RESOLVES that all nations refrain from causing, encouraging, or participating in any nuclear explosion, test or otherwise, in any environment described above.
-------------------------
This is my first proposed resolution. Any questions, comments, concerns, ideas, etc., would be great.
by Grays Harbor » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:32 pm
Quadnairia wrote:2. This isn't a complete ban on testing. Nations would be allowed to continue testing as long as fallout wouldn't spread to places outside of the testing nation. Underground testing would not be banned.
by Quadnairia » Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:41 am
New La Habana wrote:
It needs a bit more.....substance.......
by Philimbesi » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:02 am
HEREBY RESOLVES that all nations shall prohibit, prevent, and not carry out nuclear explosions, test or otherwise, at any place within their jurisdiction or control in the atmosphere, outer space, underwater, or in any other environment if an explosion would send radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion;
by New La Habana » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:16 am
Philimbesi wrote:HEREBY RESOLVES that all nations shall prohibit, prevent, and not carry out nuclear explosions, test or otherwise, at any place within their jurisdiction or control in the atmosphere, outer space, underwater, or in any other environment if an explosion would send radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion;
Bans the use of nuclear weapons and such we can not support this.
Nigel S Youlkin
USP Ambassador to the WA.
by Flibbleites » Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:12 am
New La Habana wrote:Philimbesi wrote:HEREBY RESOLVES that all nations shall prohibit, prevent, and not carry out nuclear explosions, test or otherwise, at any place within their jurisdiction or control in the atmosphere, outer space, underwater, or in any other environment if an explosion would send radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion;
Bans the use of nuclear weapons and such we can not support this.
Nigel S Youlkin
USP Ambassador to the WA.
OOC: I think that the general idea is that it only bans nuclear tests, it is the wording of it that makes it seem like it bans all use of nuclear weapons, which isn't the intention as far as I'm aware.....
by Quadrimmina » Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:34 am
Bears Armed wrote:Quadrimmina wrote:The Republic of Quadrimmina expresses concerns that not allowing WA nations to develop and test nuclear weapons will lead to a disparity between the quality of nuclear technology in WA nations and non-WA nations. This would render WA nations unable to defend themselves. We will not allow this. AGAINST.
You don't have any allies outside of the WA to whom you could contract-out the testing?
by Guttenberg Republics » Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:41 am
by New Atlanticia » Thu Aug 26, 2010 12:11 pm
Guttenberg Republics wrote:you must understand that if a mosquete on its age was the nuclear missile of ours. being or not, people will always make something worse!
by Serrland » Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:34 pm
NOTICING the fact that many non member nations are hostile towards WA members,
REALIZING that the WA members need to be able to defend themselves if attacked,
1. DECLARES that WA members are allowed to possess nuclear weapons to defend themselves from hostile nations,
by Quadrimmina » Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:51 pm
Serrland wrote:We feel that this resolution, while not in direct contradiction of the NAPA, is in contradiction to the spirit of the NAPA.NOTICING the fact that many non member nations are hostile towards WA members,
REALIZING that the WA members need to be able to defend themselves if attacked,
1. DECLARES that WA members are allowed to possess nuclear weapons to defend themselves from hostile nations,
The NAPA clauses quoted above touts the right to self-defense as a reason for allowing for the legality of WA nuclear arsenals. Should this proposed resolution go into effect the spirit of the NAPA will be severely undermined - how is a WA nation to possess nuclear weapons in a defensive capacity if they are unable to properly test them? That removes a great deal of the deterrent factor: a non-WA nation would undoubtedly be less worried about an untested nuclear arsenal than one that has been successfully tested.
Flibbleites wrote:New La Habana wrote:Philimbesi wrote:HEREBY RESOLVES that all nations shall prohibit, prevent, and not carry out nuclear explosions, test or otherwise, at any place within their jurisdiction or control in the atmosphere, outer space, underwater, or in any other environment if an explosion would send radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion;
Bans the use of nuclear weapons and such we can not support this.
Nigel S Youlkin
USP Ambassador to the WA.
OOC: I think that the general idea is that it only bans nuclear tests, it is the wording of it that makes it seem like it bans all use of nuclear weapons, which isn't the intention as far as I'm aware.....
We've got a saying around here, "The law means what the law says." And this proposal would most definitely ban the use of nuclear weapons not just because of the "or otherwise" bit, but also because using a nuclear weapon would certainly "end radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion." As a result The Rogue Nation of Flibbleites can not suppport this proposal.
Bob Flibble
WA Representative
by New Atlanticia » Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:49 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement