NATION

PASSWORD

Defeated: Nuclear Weapon Test Ban

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.
User avatar
Quadnairia
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Defeated: Nuclear Weapon Test Ban

Postby Quadnairia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:39 am

Nuclear Weapon Test Ban
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Significant

The World Assembly

NOTING the danger presented by nuclear fallout

CONCERNED about the testing and use of nuclear weapons

HEREBY RESOLVES that all nations shall prohibit, prevent, and not carry out nuclear explosions, test or otherwise, at any place within their jurisdiction or control in the atmosphere, outer space, underwater, or in any other environment if an explosion would send radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion;

FURTHER RESOLVES that all nations refrain from causing, encouraging, or participating in any nuclear explosion, test or otherwise, in any environment described above.
-------------------------
This is my first proposed resolution. Any questions, comments, concerns, ideas, etc., would be great.
Last edited by Ardchoille on Sat Sep 11, 2010 3:27 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Hellestia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 821
Founded: Aug 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hellestia » Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:01 pm

The Hellestine Republic condemns such legislation to ever be proposed in the General Assembly.
    Stock Market Statistics - 1/21/11

    HSE ▲ + 43.6 | HTI ▲ + 02.02
    HEX ▲ + 8.6 | A&W ▼ - 34.08

    Currency Exchange Rates - 1/21/11

    2.1075 ₢ = $ 1.00 | 2.4721 ₢= ¥ 1.00

User avatar
Holy Roman Confederate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 894
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Roman Confederate » Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:18 pm

This would basically limit members to the club of nuclear powers to those already with fission/fusion weapons. We cannot and will not support this measure.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=78531
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=79073&p=3753933#p3753933

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:36 pm

The Mind of Charlotte Ryberg is unable to support a complete ban on nuclear weapons. Technological advances in weaponry could stagnate even if we were never to deploy a single silo in a real war.

Yours etc,

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:51 pm

We believe it may well contradict NAPA as well, which would render it illegal.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Meekinos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 776
Founded: Sep 10, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Meekinos » Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:26 pm

Never mind that's it's idealistic twaddle.
Ambassador Gavriil Floros
Meekinos' Official WA Ambassador
Deputy Treasurer, North Pleides Merchant's Syndicate
CEO & Financial Manager of Delta Energy Ltd.
Madame Elina Nikodemos
Executive Senior Delegate
Educator
The Hellenic Republic of Meekinos
Factbook: Your Friendly Guide to Meekinos
The paranoid, isolationist, xenophobic capitalists.

User avatar
Wolffbaden
Diplomat
 
Posts: 529
Founded: Mar 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolffbaden » Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:58 pm

The Empire of Wolffbaden dismisses this proposal as an absurd idea. We have already been granted the right to defend ourselves with nuclear armaments; this seeks to eliminate it.

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21482
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Wed Aug 25, 2010 4:14 am

Grays Harbor wrote:We believe it may well contradict NAPA as well, which would render it illegal.

No, NAPA simply allows nations to own nuclear weapons, it doesn't say anything about testing -- or, for that matter, using -- them.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Quadrimmina
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Quadrimmina » Wed Aug 25, 2010 4:40 am

The Republic of Quadrimmina expresses concerns that not allowing WA nations to develop and test nuclear weapons will lead to a disparity between the quality of nuclear technology in WA nations and non-WA nations. This would render WA nations unable to defend themselves. We will not allow this. AGAINST.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Kerrigan, Ambassador to the World Assembly from the Republic of Quadrimmina.
National Profile | Ambassadorial Profile | Quadrimmina Gazette-Post | Protect, Free, Restore: UDL

Authored:
GA#111 (Medical Research Ethics Act)
SC#28 (Commend Sionis Prioratus)
GA#197 (Banning Extrajudicial Transfer)

Co-authored:
GA#110 (Identity Theft Prevention Act)
GA#171 (Freedom in Medical Research)
GA#196 (Freedom of Information Act)

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21482
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Wed Aug 25, 2010 5:38 am

Quadrimmina wrote:The Republic of Quadrimmina expresses concerns that not allowing WA nations to develop and test nuclear weapons will lead to a disparity between the quality of nuclear technology in WA nations and non-WA nations. This would render WA nations unable to defend themselves. We will not allow this. AGAINST.

You don't have any allies outside of the WA to whom you could contract-out the testing?
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Quadnairia
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Quadnairia » Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:26 am

Two points:

1. This isn't a ban on nuclear weapons. This resolution would not affect the ownership of weapons. It only limits how weapons would be used and tested.

2. This isn't a complete ban on testing. Nations would be allowed to continue testing as long as fallout wouldn't spread to places outside of the testing nation. Underground testing would not be banned.

User avatar
New La Habana
Diplomat
 
Posts: 545
Founded: Aug 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New La Habana » Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:28 am

Quadnairia wrote:Nuclear Weapon Test Ban
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Significant

The World Assembly

NOTING the danger presented by nuclear fallout

CONCERNED about the testing and use of nuclear weapons

HEREBY RESOLVES that all nations shall prohibit, prevent, and not carry out nuclear explosions, test or otherwise, at any place within their jurisdiction or control in the atmosphere, outer space, underwater, or in any other environment if an explosion would send radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion;

FURTHER RESOLVES that all nations refrain from causing, encouraging, or participating in any nuclear explosion, test or otherwise, in any environment described above.
-------------------------
This is my first proposed resolution. Any questions, comments, concerns, ideas, etc., would be great.


It needs a bit more.....substance.......
Original NationStates Player Since 2002



Division 5 Alert Level:54321
Division 10 Alert Level:54321
Division 11 Alert Level:54321

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:32 pm

Quadnairia wrote:2. This isn't a complete ban on testing. Nations would be allowed to continue testing as long as fallout wouldn't spread to places outside of the testing nation. Underground testing would not be banned.


We would love to hear your thoughts on just how we are to control continental prevailing winds and currents?
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Quadnairia
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Quadnairia » Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:41 am

New La Habana wrote:
It needs a bit more.....substance.......


Any ideas you have are welcome.

Again, to those who are worried about such things, I have to point out that underground testing WOULD NOT be banned. Fallout from underground tests doesn't travel that far.

User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Philimbesi » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:02 am

HEREBY RESOLVES that all nations shall prohibit, prevent, and not carry out nuclear explosions, test or otherwise, at any place within their jurisdiction or control in the atmosphere, outer space, underwater, or in any other environment if an explosion would send radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion;


Bans the use of nuclear weapons and such we can not support this.

Nigel S Youlkin
USP Ambassador to the WA.
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
New La Habana
Diplomat
 
Posts: 545
Founded: Aug 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New La Habana » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:16 am

Philimbesi wrote:
HEREBY RESOLVES that all nations shall prohibit, prevent, and not carry out nuclear explosions, test or otherwise, at any place within their jurisdiction or control in the atmosphere, outer space, underwater, or in any other environment if an explosion would send radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion;


Bans the use of nuclear weapons and such we can not support this.

Nigel S Youlkin
USP Ambassador to the WA.


OOC: I think that the general idea is that it only bans nuclear tests, it is the wording of it that makes it seem like it bans all use of nuclear weapons, which isn't the intention as far as I'm aware.....
Original NationStates Player Since 2002



Division 5 Alert Level:54321
Division 10 Alert Level:54321
Division 11 Alert Level:54321

User avatar
Flibbleites
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6569
Founded: Jan 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Flibbleites » Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:12 am

New La Habana wrote:
Philimbesi wrote:
HEREBY RESOLVES that all nations shall prohibit, prevent, and not carry out nuclear explosions, test or otherwise, at any place within their jurisdiction or control in the atmosphere, outer space, underwater, or in any other environment if an explosion would send radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion;


Bans the use of nuclear weapons and such we can not support this.

Nigel S Youlkin
USP Ambassador to the WA.


OOC: I think that the general idea is that it only bans nuclear tests, it is the wording of it that makes it seem like it bans all use of nuclear weapons, which isn't the intention as far as I'm aware.....

We've got a saying around here, "The law means what the law says." And this proposal would most definitely ban the use of nuclear weapons not just because of the "or otherwise" bit, but also because using a nuclear weapon would certainly "end radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion." As a result The Rogue Nation of Flibbleites can not suppport this proposal.

Bob Flibble
WA Representative

User avatar
Quadrimmina
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Quadrimmina » Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:34 am

Bears Armed wrote:
Quadrimmina wrote:The Republic of Quadrimmina expresses concerns that not allowing WA nations to develop and test nuclear weapons will lead to a disparity between the quality of nuclear technology in WA nations and non-WA nations. This would render WA nations unable to defend themselves. We will not allow this. AGAINST.

You don't have any allies outside of the WA to whom you could contract-out the testing?

We would never contract out the testing of our top secret weapons programs to other nations that may one day be our enemies in war. To do so would be to compromise the safety and security of our nation.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Kerrigan, Ambassador to the World Assembly from the Republic of Quadrimmina.
National Profile | Ambassadorial Profile | Quadrimmina Gazette-Post | Protect, Free, Restore: UDL

Authored:
GA#111 (Medical Research Ethics Act)
SC#28 (Commend Sionis Prioratus)
GA#197 (Banning Extrajudicial Transfer)

Co-authored:
GA#110 (Identity Theft Prevention Act)
GA#171 (Freedom in Medical Research)
GA#196 (Freedom of Information Act)

User avatar
Guttenberg Republics
Attaché
 
Posts: 90
Founded: Aug 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Guttenberg Republics » Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:41 am

you must understand that if a mosquete on its age was the nuclear missile of ours. being or not, people will always make something worse!
The Federation of Guttenberg Republics

Prime Minister Jossef Rosberg
______________________________________________________________________

Nuclear Arsenal:
12 KMN-21 Tactical Nukes
2 JHg'91 Uranium Bombs

User avatar
Severania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 530
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Severania » Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:58 am

The Holy Empire refuses to approve of this.

User avatar
New Atlanticia
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: Aug 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Atlanticia » Thu Aug 26, 2010 12:11 pm

Guttenberg Republics wrote:you must understand that if a mosquete on its age was the nuclear missile of ours. being or not, people will always make something worse!


The People's Republic of new Atlanticia agrees. However, the point of fact is this isn't a ban on the ownership of nuclear weapons, nor the testing of them. We see that as clear as day. Confined, and recorded testings are needed in order for the people of not just a nation, but for the World to feel safe.

Nuclear arms are good. Think of the technological advances that we have already been through in our life. If we put a stop on Nuclear Weapons tech. We would be deterring ourselves from greater technology in the future.

The proposal has the full support of New Atlanticia!

User avatar
Serrland
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11968
Founded: Sep 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Serrland » Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:34 pm

We feel that this resolution, while not in direct contradiction of the NAPA, is in contradiction to the spirit of the NAPA.

NOTICING the fact that many non member nations are hostile towards WA members,
REALIZING that the WA members need to be able to defend themselves if attacked,
1. DECLARES that WA members are allowed to possess nuclear weapons to defend themselves from hostile nations,


The NAPA clauses quoted above touts the right to self-defense as a reason for allowing for the legality of WA nuclear arsenals. Should this proposed resolution go into effect the spirit of the NAPA will be severely undermined - how is a WA nation to possess nuclear weapons in a defensive capacity if they are unable to properly test them? That removes a great deal of the deterrent factor: a non-WA nation would undoubtedly be less worried about an untested nuclear arsenal than one that has been successfully tested.
Last edited by Serrland on Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Quadrimmina
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Quadrimmina » Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:51 pm

Serrland wrote:We feel that this resolution, while not in direct contradiction of the NAPA, is in contradiction to the spirit of the NAPA.

NOTICING the fact that many non member nations are hostile towards WA members,
REALIZING that the WA members need to be able to defend themselves if attacked,
1. DECLARES that WA members are allowed to possess nuclear weapons to defend themselves from hostile nations,


The NAPA clauses quoted above touts the right to self-defense as a reason for allowing for the legality of WA nuclear arsenals. Should this proposed resolution go into effect the spirit of the NAPA will be severely undermined - how is a WA nation to possess nuclear weapons in a defensive capacity if they are unable to properly test them? That removes a great deal of the deterrent factor: a non-WA nation would undoubtedly be less worried about an untested nuclear arsenal than one that has been successfully tested.


I defer to the delegation from Flibbleites for my response.
Flibbleites wrote:
New La Habana wrote:
Philimbesi wrote:
HEREBY RESOLVES that all nations shall prohibit, prevent, and not carry out nuclear explosions, test or otherwise, at any place within their jurisdiction or control in the atmosphere, outer space, underwater, or in any other environment if an explosion would send radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion;


Bans the use of nuclear weapons and such we can not support this.

Nigel S Youlkin
USP Ambassador to the WA.


OOC: I think that the general idea is that it only bans nuclear tests, it is the wording of it that makes it seem like it bans all use of nuclear weapons, which isn't the intention as far as I'm aware.....

We've got a saying around here, "The law means what the law says." And this proposal would most definitely ban the use of nuclear weapons not just because of the "or otherwise" bit, but also because using a nuclear weapon would certainly "end radioactive fallout outside of the territorial limits of the nation carrying out the explosion." As a result The Rogue Nation of Flibbleites can not suppport this proposal.

Bob Flibble
WA Representative
Sincerely,
Alexandra Kerrigan, Ambassador to the World Assembly from the Republic of Quadrimmina.
National Profile | Ambassadorial Profile | Quadrimmina Gazette-Post | Protect, Free, Restore: UDL

Authored:
GA#111 (Medical Research Ethics Act)
SC#28 (Commend Sionis Prioratus)
GA#197 (Banning Extrajudicial Transfer)

Co-authored:
GA#110 (Identity Theft Prevention Act)
GA#171 (Freedom in Medical Research)
GA#196 (Freedom of Information Act)

User avatar
New Korongo
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6019
Founded: Aug 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Korongo » Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:17 am

Nuclear stockpiles stop world wars.

User avatar
New Atlanticia
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: Aug 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Atlanticia » Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:49 am

No, they cause mass paranoia, and spread fear. That doesn't win wars. It just creates a boiling point.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads