Masucciania wrote:To the Honorable Delegate from Quadrimmina:
To answer your question: no. It is not our, our being the World Assembly's, solemn duty to uphold basic rights and principles; it the duty of state governments to perform that function. The international community should be concerned with matters which are actually international in nation.
As per the "NatSov/IntFed" dynamic, I did not bring that up in response to your statement; I was merely commenting on another delegate's excellent analysis of the two dominant types of WA members.
The Confederacy of Masucciania respectfully yields the floor,
Of course, the World Assembly's purpose is to deal with international matters. But the precedent of matters and GA history shows that our assembly is very much in the business of protecting individual rights if such rights are not guaranteed or upheld by the member state in general. It is a time-honored debate, the debate between those resisting WA right-granting and those proposing it.
Meanwhile, Sionis Prioratus was without a doubt for the WA upholding member nation rights. Whether you agree with that or not, they did a lot to help people, and helped make this assembly and the world a better place. What more do you need to know to understand that they deserve this commendation.