NATION

PASSWORD

Silly and/or Illegal GA Proposals. zOMG!

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:37 pm

On Multilateral Trade Talks

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.





Category: Free Trade


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Auralia




Description: Recognizing the value of international trade to national economies and populations,

Seeking to promote multilateral trade negotiations between all World Assembly member nations,

The General Assembly,

1.
Extends the mandate of the World Assembly Trade Commission to include the hosting of yearly multilateral trade negotiations, with the ultimate goal of reducing protectionist measures between all member nations;

2.
Mandates that all member nations send at least one qualified representative to these negotiations;

3.
Further mandates that, during these negotiations, all member nations make a good faith attempt to cooperate with other nations in order to come to mutually beneficial agreements which are in the best interests of all national populations involved;

4.
Declares that any agreement arising from these negotiations is binding on all member nations which consent to that agreement.



Seems to be house of cards, trying to ammend and mandating roleplay
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Auralia » Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:45 pm

Grays Harbor wrote:snip


1. I've submitted it in the past, and the mods had no problem with it. Extending the mandate of the WATC is not a house of cards violation; I've used the exact same terminology in a passed resolution. I can't see how the resolution is mandating roleplay either.

2. This is not the proper thread to post your concerns; the proposal has its own thread.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:28 am

couldn't find it when I went through before I posted. so sorry if I offended you.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Moronist Decisions
Minister
 
Posts: 2131
Founded: Jul 05, 2008
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Moronist Decisions » Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:37 pm

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: kloudarch_1347675140

Repeal "Rights and Duties of WA States"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#2

Proposed by: Kloudarch

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #2: Rights and Duties of WA States (Category: Political Stability; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Finding that the amendment "Rights and Duties of WA States" although being a founding document of the WA, is inadequate in the face of "widespread universal conflict" involving the community of NationStates at large and a foreign and segregated body. And therefore proposes the this amendment be withdrawn to make way for a new edited legislation, that will unite the community against a foreign threat.

Approvals: 2 (1-502nd Airborne Inf, Brotherhood Steel)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 66 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 2 days 23 hours


Illegal, no actual operative clause (only "proposes" that an "amendment" be withdrawn).
Note: Unless specifically specified, my comments shall be taken as those purely of Moronist Decisions and do not represent the views of the Republic/Region of Europeia.

Member of Europeia
Ideological Bulwark #255
IntSane: International Sanity for All

Author of GAR#194, GAR#198 and GAR#203.

User avatar
Moronist Decisions
Minister
 
Posts: 2131
Founded: Jul 05, 2008
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Moronist Decisions » Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:53 pm

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: majman_1347824933

Mass Transit Proposition
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental

Industry Affected: Automobile Manufacturing

Proposed by: Majman

Description: This act forces countries to provide bus and bike lanes and have at least three other forms of mass transit across the country.

1. By doing this, the nation's air will be fresher, which will lead to longer lives. Also, this would cut down on road cost.

2.If passed, nations have to add bus lanes and have more mass transit opportunities available. This would cut down on traffic.

This act should be passed so we can have less road rage in countries. Also the act should be helping make our countries prettier.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 68 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 7 hours


Blogpostal?
Note: Unless specifically specified, my comments shall be taken as those purely of Moronist Decisions and do not represent the views of the Republic/Region of Europeia.

Member of Europeia
Ideological Bulwark #255
IntSane: International Sanity for All

Author of GAR#194, GAR#198 and GAR#203.

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:49 pm

It also highlights an appallingly simplistic ideal of what mass transit is, how it is used, and where it is viable.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Flibbleites
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6569
Founded: Jan 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Flibbleites » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:39 am

Loyalty to Region

A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.


Category: International Security
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: British Samua

Description: This proposal bans WA member nations from betrayal of a region the have recently moved to this will stop raiding as soon as you arrive in a nation you must wait 48 hours after moving to begin a raid.
Illegal, Metagaming.

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Thu Sep 27, 2012 9:10 pm

Prohibition of Abortion

KNOWING that many are for the choice of abortion. Those who believe in this of the arguement that it is a woman's choice

DISTURBED by the execution of living humans, with beating hearts. Innocent, and unable to have a say on their own life.

UNDER THIS RESOLUTION

1. All forms of abortion are here by prohibited.
a. Of these, gender, rape, and incest, are included. Mothers can choose to put the child up for adoption or accept the child as her own. The reason for this being that as adults, those who were concieved in rape or incest would rather be alive than to be aborted without a say.
2. An abortion is here by murder. All of those associated will be charged.
3. Controdicting resolutions are to be repealed at the choice of the General Assembly.

FOR the sake of the unborn children, the future leaders of the world, the General Assembly hereby enacts a permanent prohibition of abortion


I'm pretty sure this is illegal for contradicting GAR# 128
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Kryozerkia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 11096
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Kryozerkia » Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:57 am

Oneracon wrote:
Prohibition of Abortion

KNOWING that many are for the choice of abortion. Those who believe in this of the arguement that it is a woman's choice

DISTURBED by the execution of living humans, with beating hearts. Innocent, and unable to have a say on their own life.

UNDER THIS RESOLUTION

1. All forms of abortion are here by prohibited.
a. Of these, gender, rape, and incest, are included. Mothers can choose to put the child up for adoption or accept the child as her own. The reason for this being that as adults, those who were concieved in rape or incest would rather be alive than to be aborted without a say.
2. An abortion is here by murder. All of those associated will be charged.
3. Controdicting resolutions are to be repealed at the choice of the General Assembly.

FOR the sake of the unborn children, the future leaders of the world, the General Assembly hereby enacts a permanent prohibition of abortion


I'm pretty sure this is illegal for contradicting GAR# 128

Yep. Then there is category. Then there is optionality.
Problem to Report?
Game-side: Getting Help
Forum-side: Moderation
Technical issue/suggestion: Technical
A-well-a, don't you know about the bird
♦ Well, everybody knows that the bird is the word ♦
♦ A-well-a, bird, bird, b-bird's the word

Get the cheese to Sickbay

"Ok folks, show's over... Nothing to see here... Show's OH MY GOD! A horrible plane crash! Hey everybody, get a load of this flaming wreckage! Come on, crowd around, crowd around, don't be shy, crowd around!" -- Chief Wiggum

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9987
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:00 am

But think of the children!
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Major of The Black Hawks
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Tal and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: Mall is following those weird beef-only diets now.

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:10 am

Mallorea and Riva wrote:But think of the children!


I always read that in the voice of Helen Lovejoy... which is surprisingly appropriate in this case.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:23 pm

Legalize World Gambling
A resolution to legalize or outlaw gambling.
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Legalize

Proposed by: Magillaville

Description: Gambling in all shapes and forms is timeless and knows no boundaries. Attempts to make gambling illegal only allows for all kinds of crime to exist when gambling is done outside an establishment such as a regulated casino, racetrack, etc. Off shore betting and internet betting will be regulated and taxed in accordance to both the place where the bet is made and the place where the bet is taken. This gambling ordinance will help many of the impoverished countries to better their way of life while allowing other developed countries to provide the best gambling and entertainment options for its citizens.


How cute, yet another blog masquerading as a proposal.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:41 pm

Corporations Donations Act
A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.

Category: Social Justice | Strength: Significant | Proposed by: Agrase

Description: ADDRESSING all corporations in nations that are members of the World Assembly: From the date of the signing of this act into law (assuming it is passed) all corporations with an annual income of five million x* (x* being that nation's currency) for the good of civilization, the business sector, the economy, the poor, and the education systems will be required to donate a quarter of their annual revenue to homeless shelters and the bottom 20% of the population. Another quarter of the annual revenue will be donated to the youth of the bottom 20% for them to attend post-secondary education for better job placement in the donating company. The funds of these donations will not come from the salaries of employees in said companies.

So idealistic, so innocent and sweet, so utopian... and also not likely to happen.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Felix Terra
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1233
Founded: Jun 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Felix Terra » Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:43 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Corporations Donations Act
A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.

Category: Social Justice | Strength: Significant | Proposed by: Agrase

Description: ADDRESSING all corporations in nations that are members of the World Assembly: From the date of the signing of this act into law (assuming it is passed) all corporations with an annual income of five million x* (x* being that nation's currency) for the good of civilization, the business sector, the economy, the poor, and the education systems will be required to donate a quarter of their annual revenue to homeless shelters and the bottom 20% of the population. Another quarter of the annual revenue will be donated to the youth of the bottom 20% for them to attend post-secondary education for better job placement in the donating company. The funds of these donations will not come from the salaries of employees in said companies.

So idealistic, so innocent and sweet, so utopian... and also not likely to happen.

And not written right. Also, your right. Even I'M not that idealistic, and believe me, I'm pretty idealistic.

EDIT: Typo fix.
Last edited by Felix Terra on Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
why are you looking at a post from 2012 go home you're drunk

East Apikai is my main nation nowadays

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:48 pm

Felix Terra wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:
Corporations Donations Act
A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.

Category: Social Justice | Strength: Significant | Proposed by: Agrase

Description: ADDRESSING all corporations in nations that are members of the World Assembly: From the date of the signing of this act into law (assuming it is passed) all corporations with an annual income of five million x* (x* being that nation's currency) for the good of civilization, the business sector, the economy, the poor, and the education systems will be required to donate a quarter of their annual revenue to homeless shelters and the bottom 20% of the population. Another quarter of the annual revenue will be donated to the youth of the bottom 20% for them to attend post-secondary education for better job placement in the donating company. The funds of these donations will not come from the salaries of employees in said companies.

So idealistic, so innocent and sweet, so utopian... and also not likely to happen.

And not written right. Also, your you're right. Even I'M not that idealistic, and believe me, I'm pretty idealistic.

EDIT: Typo fix.

Just to be pedantic... fixed. :P
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Sanctaria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7922
Founded: Sep 12, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Sanctaria » Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:37 pm

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: leikistan_1349207435

Ban Homosexuality
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.


Category: Moral Decency

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Leikistan

Description: Nations of the World Assembly,

CONVINCED that tolerance towards homosexuality has caused the decay of member nations of the World Assembly.

RECOGNIZES the social dangers of homosexuality as such:
-Diseases such as STDs are very prominent, more so in homosexual groups than heterosexual groups.
-Domestic violence rates are much higher among homosexual couples than heterosexual couples.
-Intolerance and hatred for others of different mindsets are more prominent with homosexuals.

RECOGNIZES that the majority of citizens within the WA are of some religious organization that does not promote homosexuality, and, in most cases goes as far so to deem the practice of such as sin and a disgrace.

BELIEVES that homosexuality and homosexuals, as a minority, cause more damage and danger to society than heterosexuality and heterosexuals as a majority.

BELIEVES that the majority of the populace has been upset due to the tolerance and acceptance of a dangerous minority.

MANDATES that all nations accept the following:
-The practice of homosexuality be banned from any member nation and be made an act of crime.
-All currently practicing homosexuals, and those convicted of further offenses, be offered rehabilitation, and, if such rehabilitation is neglected, the offender be imprisoned for the amount of time appointed by the State's judge.
-All unions between those of the same sex be nullified.
-Homosexuality be defined as an act against nature and the stability of society.

URGING all member nations to recognize the importance of this resolution and to vote wisely.

I don't think I actually need to explain what's wrong with this one.
Divine Federation of Sanctaria

Ideological Bulwark #258

Dr. Bethany Greer CMD, Sanctarian Ambassador to the World Assembly
Author of:
GA#109 GA#133 GA#176 GA#201 GA#222 GA#297
GA#590 (Co)
Frisbeeteria wrote:Do people not realize that moderators can tell when someone is wanking?

Luna Amore wrote:Sanc is always watching. Ever vigilant.

Auralia wrote:Your condescending attitude is remarkably annoying.

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:04 am

Sanctaria wrote:I don't think I actually need to explain what's wrong with this one.


Blatant lies and contradiction of previous GA resolutions. Quite a mixture.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Felix Terra
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1233
Founded: Jun 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Viewer Deccency... AGAIN.

Postby Felix Terra » Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:07 am

Description: Due to the growing advancement of television and other visual transmitting technology, the World Assembly Resolution “View Decency Act” will list out regulations and rules.

ARTICLE I
1A) All WA member countries will be mandated to restrict government programming unless it is: News, Campaigns, Election Hosting, or Emergency Broadcasting
1B) WA Nation governments will be restricted to hosting programs with affiliated or endorsed programs showing: Intense Violence, Nudity, and Intense Profanity. Only programs directly benefiting the Military will be excepted.
1C) WA Nations shall not host interrogations or torture on visual transmissions or other products
1D) WA Nations shall not be allowed to sponsor programming that will not directly benefit their nation, economy, or military

ARTICLE II
2A) Emergency Broadcasting shall only be used during test drills and only used under certain circumstances
2B) Emergency Broadcasting shall only be performed for its purpose, to inform the general public and not be used for anything else

ARTICLE III
3A) All visual transmission programs or shows shall always be rated to suit viewers with ratings
3B) Ratings will suit children, teenagers, young adults, and adults in the respective order

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 68 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 2 days 22 hours


Again?
Last edited by Felix Terra on Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
why are you looking at a post from 2012 go home you're drunk

East Apikai is my main nation nowadays

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:38 pm

No-No negative ads
A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.

Category: Political Stability
Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Bazella


Description: Recognizing the importance of political Ads in a society.

The General Assembly Declares,

Due to ramifications and blasphemous lies, the use of negative ad's shall henceforth be illegal for any & all forms of elections.

From TV to newspapers. Every-time an ad is in place, they *MUST* be fully fact-checked, and if it hints a strong negative image upon the other people running, must be banned and deleted.

Requiring that one qualified delegate from each and every nation must meet once a year, to discuss the ratio's of banned ads vs used, along with the costs offset by each action.

To benefit the people of each and every nation, which hold elections of course, negative ad's must be belayed and only positive ad's be put in place.


:palm: Really? Its a mini blogposal.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Eireann Fae
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eireann Fae » Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:26 am

I blame the US political season (and elsewhere?)...

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:45 am

Eireann Fae wrote:I blame the US political season (and elsewhere?)...


Just no-one tell Steph...I think she's just finished the MegaDefenestrator 5000, and she's wanting test fodder.

Now, back to topic, again...

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Thu Oct 04, 2012 7:23 am

Damanucus wrote:
Eireann Fae wrote:I blame the US political season (and elsewhere?)...


Just no-one tell Steph...I think she's just finished the MegaDefenestrator 5000, and she's wanting test fodder.

Now, back to topic, again...

Awesome, I thought that was still in the testing stage. Let me know when the first use shall be, I'll bring the popcorn.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Auralia » Fri Oct 05, 2012 3:50 pm

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: silician_1349474770

Repeal "On Multilateral Trade Talks"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#221

Proposed by: Silician

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #221: On Multilateral Trade Talks (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This resolution is unnecessary. Resolutions 208 and 209 cover free foreign trade fairly well already. Having a meeting with over 16,000 member nations would take forever and would be very disorganized. Plus, it's not like trade negotiations between WA nations is just going to stop abruptly. As far as I'm concerned, negotiations already happen in private constantly between the different nations in trade with each other. The only reason this resolution passed is so that member nations could have an excuse for a gigantic international party. If you think my last statement sounds crazy, check out the General Assembly topic in the forums, then tell me I'm wrong. This resolution needs to be repealed to make way for more important resolutions, and I'm sure many other nations agree with me

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 68 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours


Metagaming.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Felix Terra
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1233
Founded: Jun 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Felix Terra » Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:25 pm

Auralia wrote:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: silician_1349474770

Repeal "On Multilateral Trade Talks"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#221

Proposed by: Silician

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #221: On Multilateral Trade Talks (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This resolution is unnecessary. Resolutions 208 and 209 cover free foreign trade fairly well already. Having a meeting with over 16,000 member nations would take forever and would be very disorganized. Plus, it's not like trade negotiations between WA nations is just going to stop abruptly. As far as I'm concerned, negotiations already happen in private constantly between the different nations in trade with each other. The only reason this resolution passed is so that member nations could have an excuse for a gigantic international party. If you think my last statement sounds crazy, check out the General Assembly topic in the forums, then tell me I'm wrong. This resolution needs to be repealed to make way for more important resolutions, and I'm sure many other nations agree with me

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 68 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 5 hours


Metagaming.

And house of cards.
why are you looking at a post from 2012 go home you're drunk

East Apikai is my main nation nowadays

User avatar
Mousebumples
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 8623
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Mousebumples » Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:11 pm

Felix Terra wrote:And house of cards.

House of Cards is permissible in repeals.
Leader of the Mouse-a-rific Mousetastic Moderator Mousedom of Mousebumples
Past WA Delegate for Europeia & Monkey Island
Proud Member of UNOG
I'm an "adorably marvelous NatSov" - Mallorea and Riva
GA Resolutions (sorted by category) | Why Repeal? | Reppy's Sig Workshop

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads