NATION

PASSWORD

Silly and/or Illegal GA Proposals. zOMG!

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21281
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:59 am

Damanucus wrote:
Reduce Toxic Waste

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: All Businesses


Proposed by: Nazi Germany III

Description: The General Assembly,

HORRIFIED at the consequences of leaving toxic waste go unchecked, and that companies are known to dispose of it by dumping it in public infrastructure (e.g. oceans, rivers, sewers, streets),

DEFINES, for the purpose of this resolution, "toxic waste" as an item or item(s) that can cause [any] damage to the enviroment in any way that might significantly affect the ecosystem (ANY ecosystem, be that city life, or nature, etc), which includes but is not limited to: spent nuclear rods, hazardous materials such as leftover coolant fluid, oil, etc,

TERRIFIED of the risk to health, property and the environment that this toxic waste can bring about,

DETERMINED to stop this appalling abuse of our infrastructure, and the damage it causes to the environment* and our people.

*here defined as the predominantly occurring conditions of the land within a nation, including such things as weather patterns, chemical/radiation levels, and flora/fauna. Not taking into account changes caused by human intervention in the past 10 years.

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the risks harmful toxic waste poses to humanity and the environment,

PROVIDES the following list of specifications that countries must meet:

--Must crack down on all corporations, people, and government branches, within reasonable limitations of cost, for this purpose no less than 1% of the national budget, for polluting the environment with toxic waste,

--Must force all corporations, people, and government branches to immediately halt their pollution of the environment, save where it can be determined by the government that the immediate halt of the polluting activity or industry would cause more damage to the people than the pollution itself does,

--Must [the government] aid research into safely storing the current and future waves of toxic waste, in whatever facility or container adequately contains such waste, by providing funding and contractors,

--Must [the government] aid efforts to clean up the environment at it's present, by switching to more effective means of transportation (e.g. gas to electric), cleaning up environmentally damaging spills of toxic substances immediately, and devise new, safer systems to keep hazardous material in-check.

HEREBY DECLARES that all countries institute this document immediately upon acceptance from the General Assembly, for the greater good of their environment and their population, and that goals be set for a standard of environmental and human cleanliness.


Didn't we deal with this once before? (If it's improved, say so, please, so I can scratch it.)

Has its own thread...
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:23 am

Bears Armed wrote:
Damanucus wrote:
Didn't we deal with this once before? (If it's improved, say so, please, so I can scratch it.)

Has its own thread...

I finally miss one.

User avatar
Astro-Malsitari WA Seat
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 371
Founded: Sep 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Astro-Malsitari WA Seat » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:32 pm

Promoting Character Education

A resolution to promote funding and the development of education and the arts.


Category: Education and Creativity


Area of Effect: Educational


Proposed by: X3Euphoria

Description: BELIEVING children in school should be well-mannered and successful in the future;

CONCERNED that there are many rude and undisciplined adults;

DEFINES "Character Education" as a form of teaching that develops children into responsible and principled adults, and allows the different forms of ''Character Education";

BELIEVES that Character Education will prevent more crimes from happening;

ENCOURAGES schools in WA nations to teach Character Education.



Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 76 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 2 days 21 hours


Illegal, optionality.
Representing the interests of Malsitar and Astrolinium in the World Assembly
| The Sublime Island Kingdom of Astrolinium | Ambassador to the WA: Dr. Giovanni Romero, PhD | Chief Justice and Vice Magister of The South |
| The Unified Federal Republics of Malsitar | Ambassador to the WA: Dr. Chandler Whitt, LLD | Citizen of Spiritus |
And of course, Giovanni's illegitimate child and everyone's favorite pervy teen, Melvin Ruiz Walsh-Romero!

User avatar
Moronist Decisions
Minister
 
Posts: 2131
Founded: Jul 05, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Moronist Decisions » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:32 pm

"Encourages" or "Urges" is probably okay for a mild resolution. That said, still pretty pointless.
Note: Unless specifically specified, my comments shall be taken as those purely of Moronist Decisions and do not represent the views of the Republic/Region of Europeia.

Member of Europeia
Ideological Bulwark #255
IntSane: International Sanity for All

Author of GAR#194, GAR#198 and GAR#203.

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Grays Harbor » Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:36 pm

Repeal "Medical Provisions in Blockade"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal
Resolution: GA#186
Proposed by: Nawala

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #186: Medical Provisions in Blockade (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Understanding that civilians are harmed when a blockade of their countries happens they must be protected but sending medical supplies will lessen impact on a blockade and will have the embargoed country to survive by hiring smugglers to smuggle in other supplies like weapons under the guise of being medical transports. Also this resolution will help international pariahs and rogue nations survive and attempt for an outside power to bring democracy, liberate the people, or taking down the regime and/or dictators. I decree that this resolution should be repealed

Does that last bit constitute branding? Seems a bit bloggy as well.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:35 pm

Grays Harbor wrote:
Repeal "Medical Provisions in Blockade"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal
Resolution: GA#186
Proposed by: Nawala

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #186: Medical Provisions in Blockade (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Understanding that civilians are harmed when a blockade of their countries happens they must be protected but sending medical supplies will lessen impact on a blockade and will have the embargoed country to survive by hiring smugglers to smuggle in other supplies like weapons under the guise of being medical transports. Also this resolution will help international pariahs and rogue nations survive and attempt for an outside power to bring democracy, liberate the people, or taking down the regime and/or dictators. I decree that this resolution should be repealed

Does that last bit constitute branding? Seems a bit bloggy as well.

It is bloggy.

(I know it was a single-line response, but I'm trying to keep my emotions in check at the moment, for obvious reasons...)

User avatar
Moronist Decisions
Minister
 
Posts: 2131
Founded: Jul 05, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Moronist Decisions » Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:41 am

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: the_united_kingdoms_of_zackalantis_1331959267
Repeal "Double Jeopardy Prohibition"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal


Resolution: GA#187


Proposed by: The united kingdoms of zackalantis

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #187: Double Jeopardy Prohibition (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: We the nations of the world assembly do strive to make the world we live i a better place for ourselves and other nations but in order to do this we must reduce crime and take a bigger picture of the scenario which shows us that criminals cannot have a change of mind therfore i repeal the DOUBLE JEOPARDY PROHIBITION (GAR #187)

1.Criminals fall into crime due to certain problems which they face (mostly financial) and after serving their time they will do find no fear to repeat the crime.therfore i think that one must be subject to punishment any number of times for infragmentation of the law of the land

2.after committing crime more than once and facing trial the punishment ougt to be tougher to prevent them from breaking the law again.

3.after one has commited crime more than once the third time he does he /she must face life in prision.

this i ensure you that it will bring down the crime rate in the world making it a safer a nd more secure place to be in which is the ultimate goal of the world assemby member nations.

Approvals: 1 (Kingdom of Fredonia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 74 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 3 hours


Written in the first person - thus illegal. Also appears to add new operative clauses to a repeal.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: communist_quinntopia_1331984597
Lower Income Tax Act

A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.


Category: Social Justice


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Communist Quinntopia

Description: Appalled at the high tax rate of some countries, and the social divide it creates, I belive we should take action and lower the income tax in order to make the wealth of all classes in society more equal.

Some of the benefits include:

Happier citizens (More political freedoms and higher civil rights)
More spare cash for the people to spend, therefore funding the government
An increase in the economy, in both the public and private sectors.



I feel that this resolution may help World Assembly nations in the short and long term.


Category failure, and bloggy.
Note: Unless specifically specified, my comments shall be taken as those purely of Moronist Decisions and do not represent the views of the Republic/Region of Europeia.

Member of Europeia
Ideological Bulwark #255
IntSane: International Sanity for All

Author of GAR#194, GAR#198 and GAR#203.

User avatar
The Sword
Diplomat
 
Posts: 949
Founded: Oct 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sword » Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:58 am

Moronist Decisions wrote:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: the_united_kingdoms_of_zackalantis_1331959267
Repeal "Double Jeopardy Prohibition"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal


Resolution: GA#187


Proposed by: The united kingdoms of zackalantis

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #187: Double Jeopardy Prohibition (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: We the nations of the world assembly do strive to make the world we live i a better place for ourselves and other nations but in order to do this we must reduce crime and take a bigger picture of the scenario which shows us that criminals cannot have a change of mind therfore i repeal the DOUBLE JEOPARDY PROHIBITION (GAR #187)

1.Criminals fall into crime due to certain problems which they face (mostly financial) and after serving their time they will do find no fear to repeat the crime.therfore i think that one must be subject to punishment any number of times for infragmentation of the law of the land

2.after committing crime more than once and facing trial the punishment ougt to be tougher to prevent them from breaking the law again.

3.after one has commited crime more than once the third time he does he /she must face life in prision.

this i ensure you that it will bring down the crime rate in the world making it a safer a nd more secure place to be in which is the ultimate goal of the world assemby member nations.

Approvals: 1 (Kingdom of Fredonia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 74 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 3 hours


Written in the first person - thus illegal. Also appears to add new operative clauses to a repeal.


Also, bad spelling and grammar ("i" is meant to be capitalised, etc.)
0 - Inner Colonies invaded, Emergency protocol in effect, martial law declared.
1 - Total War
2 - War Readiness/Normal War
3 - increased surveillance watch
4 - Noticed, watched
5 - Peace
We are an empire spanning 40,000 solar systems, we have a population of 80 billion and our colonies are heavily defended, but we will not godmod and it is possible for our defenses - and colonies - to fall.

The plural is Swordian. I'm either PMT or FT, take your pick.

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21281
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:04 am

Recreational Drugs Crackdown
A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.

Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: Communist Quinntopia

Description: 1. Why we should outlaw recreational drugs

Recreational drugs are always a nuisance and a source of medical problems. If a country doesn't outlaw recreational drugs it doesn't know how to deal with a huge sector of crime. A nation with high levels of recreational drug users is more susceptible to an increased crime rate.

2.A GLOBAL BAN on recreational drugs would:

Decrease crime rates
Improve the health of citizens (e.g. increased life expectancy)
Take workload of the police, allowing them to focus on more serious crimes
Allow the population to increase quicker, boosting the economy and keeping the nation going.


A global ban on all recreational drugs should seriously be considered, to make sure the only drugs in a country are medicinal drugs.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 75 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 9 hours

Blogposal, and no operative clause.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Zaklen
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 443
Founded: Jun 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zaklen » Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:11 am

Bears Armed wrote:
Recreational Drugs Crackdown
A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.

Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: Communist Quinntopia

Description: 1. Why we should outlaw recreational drugs

Recreational drugs are always a nuisance and a source of medical problems. If a country doesn't outlaw recreational drugs it doesn't know how to deal with a huge sector of crime. A nation with high levels of recreational drug users is more susceptible to an increased crime rate.

2.A GLOBAL BAN on recreational drugs would:

Decrease crime rates
Improve the health of citizens (e.g. increased life expectancy)
Take workload of the police, allowing them to focus on more serious crimes
Allow the population to increase quicker, boosting the economy and keeping the nation going.


A global ban on all recreational drugs should seriously be considered, to make sure the only drugs in a country are medicinal drugs.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 75 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 9 hours

Blogposal, and no operative clause.


Also, a lot of it doesn't make sense. How would have drugs LEGAL increase crime rates. If it's legal, it's not a crime.
Last edited by Flibbleites on Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Fixed tag misalignment
- Peter Zyvex
Supreme Ruler of Zaklen
______________________________
Religion brings out both the best and the worst in humanity. Obviously, I strive to be an example of it bringing out the best.

User avatar
Flibbleites
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6569
Founded: Jan 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Flibbleites » Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:14 pm

Prevention of Torture

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Confederate German State

Description: i propose not to repal but edit the Prevention of Torture
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights World Assembly Resolution #9

i believe the torture should be conducted to terrorists and most wanted criminals. that if no torture was given no vital information would be released and more international crime would happen.

Illegal, Amendment.

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:04 am

Flibbleites wrote:
Prevention of Torture

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Confederate German State

Description: i propose not to repal but edit the Prevention of Torture
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights World Assembly Resolution #9

i believe the torture should be conducted to terrorists and most wanted criminals. that if no torture was given no vital information would be released and more international crime would happen.

Illegal, Amendment.

And slightly bloggy, with branding.

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:08 am

Forming a World Media Group

A resolution to promote funding and the development of education and the arts.


Category: Education and Creativity


Area of Effect: Free Press


Proposed by: 373

Description: The General Assembly,

ACKNOWLEDGING that many nations do not have the funds or means to provide coverage of world current events to their citizens, and

REALIZING that those nations that do may unjustly present a biased or modified version of the news in order to favor their governments, and

RECOGNIZING that knowledge of world events empower a citizen to make appropriate decisions and form just opinions,


HEREBY RESOLVES to establish a World Media Group, operated by unbiased journalists from World Assembly Member Nations across the world, which will:

A) Publish an international newspaper to cover all world events, which all Member Nations shall be obligated to distribute weekly; and

B) Maintain an international television and radio network, which will broadcast world news events as well as regional and national news events, which all Member Nations shall be obligated to grant airwaves to; and

C) Establish a World Media Group accreditation program to regulate the definition of "unbiased". Accredited journalists will be the only journalists to submit stories to the World Medial Group. These journalists must, in addition to being assessed for potential prejudice, periodically submit stories to be reviewed for bias.


Not Here, Not This Way.

User avatar
Merfurian
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 449
Founded: Jan 25, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Merfurian » Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:30 pm

Damanucus wrote:
Forming a World Media Group

A resolution to promote funding and the development of education and the arts.


Category: Education and Creativity


Area of Effect: Free Press


Proposed by: 373

Description: The General Assembly,

ACKNOWLEDGING that many nations do not have the funds or means to provide coverage of world current events to their citizens, and

REALIZING that those nations that do may unjustly present a biased or modified version of the news in order to favor their governments, and

RECOGNIZING that knowledge of world events empower a citizen to make appropriate decisions and form just opinions,


HEREBY RESOLVES to establish a World Media Group, operated by unbiased journalists from World Assembly Member Nations across the world, which will:

A) Publish an international newspaper to cover all world events, which all Member Nations shall be obligated to distribute weekly; and

B) Maintain an international television and radio network, which will broadcast world news events as well as regional and national news events, which all Member Nations shall be obligated to grant airwaves to; and

C) Establish a World Media Group accreditation program to regulate the definition of "unbiased". Accredited journalists will be the only journalists to submit stories to the World Medial Group. These journalists must, in addition to being assessed for potential prejudice, periodically submit stories to be reviewed for bias.


Not Here, Not This Way.


Couldn't you say that about lots of current WA Resolutions? The Not Here, Not This Way argument sounds a bit nat-sov to me...
Issued from the Desk of the Very Honourable and Most Loyal Doctor Jonas K. Lazareedes LLD PC FJSCU FPC, FPAC(CI)ACCA Presidential Counsel
Former Justice of the Supreme Court of the Union, Former President of Appeals Chamber I of an Autonomous Court of Appeal, Most Loyal Counsellor and Advisor to the President of the Federal Republic (Member of the Federal Privy Council) Ambassador to the World Assembly
NOTE: I am gay, and I have asperger syndrome. My social skills are rubbish.

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:35 pm

Merfurian wrote:
Damanucus wrote:
Not Here, Not This Way.


Couldn't you say that about lots of current WA Resolutions? The Not Here, Not This Way argument sounds a bit nat-sov to me...


I pull out the "Not Here, Not This Way" debate when the idea behind the resolution can be better put in a roleplay. International issues, I will support. Fluff like this...not so much. (Same goes for the currently-in-repeal "A Model World Assembly", but I digress slightly.)

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Mon Mar 19, 2012 6:44 pm

Repeal "Nuclear Arms Possession Act"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal


Resolution: GA#10


Proposed by: Kingdom of Fredonia

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #10: Nuclear Arms Possession Act (Category: International Security; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The fact that such a law has existed within the world assembly for so long is an atrocity. I propose we repeal it and make way for new reforms.

Recognising that the WA is outnumbered 3 to 1, I do not see this as a threat. Most of us are within regions were many non WA nations exist and they are considered our allies rather than hostiles.

Understands that the act allows each individual nation to set its own policies on nuclear arms, but feels we should have one clear policy.

Realising that by allowing the possession of nuclear weapons to continue will only make matters worse. If we don't repeal this act, nuclear arms will rise and put us into greater, possibly apocalyptic danger.

Please support me by scrapping this law and help to create a safer future.

Bloggy, first-person branding, and..."do not see this as a threat?" :palm:
Oh, and there is the contradiction that seems to exist in its wording.
Last edited by Damanucus on Mon Mar 19, 2012 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Moronist Decisions
Minister
 
Posts: 2131
Founded: Jul 05, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Moronist Decisions » Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:10 pm

Merfurian wrote:
Damanucus wrote:
Not Here, Not This Way.


Couldn't you say that about lots of current WA Resolutions? The Not Here, Not This Way argument sounds a bit nat-sov to me...


Oh, illegal, creates a committee only.
Note: Unless specifically specified, my comments shall be taken as those purely of Moronist Decisions and do not represent the views of the Republic/Region of Europeia.

Member of Europeia
Ideological Bulwark #255
IntSane: International Sanity for All

Author of GAR#194, GAR#198 and GAR#203.

User avatar
Laeriland
Diplomat
 
Posts: 713
Founded: Mar 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Laeriland » Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:16 am

Up on democracy

A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.


Category: Furtherment of Democracy


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: The united kingdoms of zackalantis

Description: Democracy is the backbone of a nation and by this resolution it will be strengthened.

1.people of member nations and the people only should be allowed to participate and choose their ruler in free and fair elections after a period of every five years with no delay unless of civil or political unrest or natural calamity.

2.the people of the member nations themselves through the means of media and advertising can ask their ruler what they want them to do

3.the people of member nations must must be allowed to cancel/dissolve or nullify their governments powers but only after a period of one month discussion between opposition parties.

4.the governments of member nations must allow their citizens to suggest which vice-president/prime minister etc. according to their needs

5.member nations must make it compulsory for students above the age of 14 to learn about their democratic powers and the working of their government.

keeping in mind their personal freedoms

6. the member nations must allow their citizens to do what they may for their security and self-defense as long as it is not unethical (offensive to minorities or different races).

this resolution will increase the democratic powers of the member nations

Smells like a idealogical ban, doesn't it?

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:16 pm

Laeriland wrote:
Up on democracy

A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.


Category: Furtherment of Democracy


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: The united kingdoms of zackalantis

Description: Democracy is the backbone of a nation and by this resolution it will be strengthened.

1.people of member nations and the people only should be allowed to participate and choose their ruler in free and fair elections after a period of every five years with no delay unless of civil or political unrest or natural calamity.

2.the people of the member nations themselves through the means of media and advertising can ask their ruler what they want them to do

3.the people of member nations must must be allowed to cancel/dissolve or nullify their governments powers but only after a period of one month discussion between opposition parties.

4.the governments of member nations must allow their citizens to suggest which vice-president/prime minister etc. according to their needs

5.member nations must make it compulsory for students above the age of 14 to learn about their democratic powers and the working of their government.

keeping in mind their personal freedoms

6. the member nations must allow their citizens to do what they may for their security and self-defense as long as it is not unethical (offensive to minorities or different races).

this resolution will increase the democratic powers of the member nations

Smells like a idealogical ban, doesn't it?


Good call. Congrats on your first post.

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:26 am

Humane Execution

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Scawendaen

Description: Recognizing that many member states frequently employ the death penalty as a criminal punishment for a wide variety of crimes

Acknowledging that a plethora of member states use inhumane methods to enforce the death penalty

Striving to achieve a point where every method used to enforce the death penalty is quick and painless

Believing that any method that inflicts long-lasting pain and/or tortures its victims should be outlawed and deemed illegal by all member nations

Noticing that the ONLY the following 3 methods should be used to terminate a convict’s life:
• Lethal Injection/ Euthanasia
• Gassing
• Long-Drop Hanging


I know there is a Humane Execution Act thread, but this isn't the text of the subject. Add to that its timing (repeal hasn't gone through yet; he should realistically wait), plus what seems to be a bit of what I think may be micromanagement (namely in the restriction of types of execution allowed).

User avatar
Alqania
Minister
 
Posts: 2548
Founded: Aug 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alqania » Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:42 am

Damanucus wrote:
Humane Execution

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Scawendaen

Description: Recognizing that many member states frequently employ the death penalty as a criminal punishment for a wide variety of crimes

Acknowledging that a plethora of member states use inhumane methods to enforce the death penalty

Striving to achieve a point where every method used to enforce the death penalty is quick and painless

Believing that any method that inflicts long-lasting pain and/or tortures its victims should be outlawed and deemed illegal by all member nations

Noticing that the ONLY the following 3 methods should be used to terminate a convict’s life:
• Lethal Injection/ Euthanasia
• Gassing
• Long-Drop Hanging


I know there is a Humane Execution Act thread, but this isn't the text of the subject. Add to that its timing (repeal hasn't gone through yet; he should realistically wait), plus what seems to be a bit of what I think may be micromanagement (namely in the restriction of types of execution allowed).


I don't see how any of that criticism makes this a silly or illegal proposal though. :eyebrow:
Queendom of Alqania
Amor vincit omnia et nos cedamus amori
Former Speaker of the Gay Regional Parliament
Represented in the WA by Ambassador Lord Raekevikinfo
and Deputy Ambassador Princess Christineinfo
Author of GA#178
Member of UNOG and the Stonewall Alliance

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:00 am

Alqania wrote:
Damanucus wrote:
I know there is a Humane Execution Act thread, but this isn't the text of the subject. Add to that its timing (repeal hasn't gone through yet; he should realistically wait), plus what seems to be a bit of what I think may be micromanagement (namely in the restriction of types of execution allowed).


I don't see how any of that criticism makes this a silly or illegal proposal though. :eyebrow:

Maybe you're right there.
But I read it again and noticed that it really didn't have any real active clauses, which I think is especially bad for a Strong proposal.

User avatar
Alqania
Minister
 
Posts: 2548
Founded: Aug 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alqania » Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:05 am

Damanucus wrote:
Alqania wrote:
I don't see how any of that criticism makes this a silly or illegal proposal though. :eyebrow:

Maybe you're right there.
But I read it again and noticed that it really didn't have any real active clauses, which I think is especially bad for a Strong proposal.


Could be. On a second look, I think it's in the Wrong Category (Political Stability), because it doesn't restrict the political freedoms of people, and while it could be said to restrict the political freedom of nations (i.e. national sovereignty), so could virtually all resolutions.
Queendom of Alqania
Amor vincit omnia et nos cedamus amori
Former Speaker of the Gay Regional Parliament
Represented in the WA by Ambassador Lord Raekevikinfo
and Deputy Ambassador Princess Christineinfo
Author of GA#178
Member of UNOG and the Stonewall Alliance

User avatar
Damanucus
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1699
Founded: Dec 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Damanucus » Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:15 am

Alqania wrote:
Damanucus wrote:Maybe you're right there.
But I read it again and noticed that it really didn't have any real active clauses, which I think is especially bad for a Strong proposal.


Could be. On a second look, I think it's in the Wrong Category (Political Stability), because it doesn't restrict the political freedoms of people, and while it could be said to restrict the political freedom of nations (i.e. national sovereignty), so could virtually all resolutions.


I almost said ideological limitation, but I knew that was pushing it/not right at all.
(Plus, Alqania, and I'll be honest here, I was expecting you to make the same comment as before, at which point I would've started questioning if I was getting a little too (read: unnecessarily) critical of proposals.)
Last edited by Damanucus on Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:18 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Quadrimmina
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Quadrimmina » Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:12 am

...you guys...there are like 17 proposals.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Kerrigan, Ambassador to the World Assembly from the Republic of Quadrimmina.
National Profile | Ambassadorial Profile | Quadrimmina Gazette-Post | Protect, Free, Restore: UDL

Authored:
GA#111 (Medical Research Ethics Act)
SC#28 (Commend Sionis Prioratus)
GA#197 (Banning Extrajudicial Transfer)

Co-authored:
GA#110 (Identity Theft Prevention Act)
GA#171 (Freedom in Medical Research)
GA#196 (Freedom of Information Act)

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads