NationStates

Grays Harbor wrote:The it makes even less sense.

Flibbleites wrote:

Grays Harbor wrote:The it makes even less sense.

Heck, it's not even the author's currency.

GroBdeutsches Reich's terror

A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.


Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: VermontState

Description: We deplore GroBdeutsches Reich's stance on freedom.

We oppose GroBdeutsches Reich's whimsical banning of nations.

We condemn GroBdeutsches Reich's regional terrorism.

Flibbleites wrote:

GroBdeutsches Reich's terror

A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.


Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: VermontState

Description: We deplore GroBdeutsches Reich's stance on freedom.

We oppose GroBdeutsches Reich's whimsical banning of nations.

We condemn GroBdeutsches Reich's regional terrorism.

Illegal, Branding and it was submitted 4 times.

Moronist Decisions wrote:

Flibbleites wrote:Illegal, Branding and it was submitted 4 times.

I thought it was more wrong council/category (should be SC/condemnations). It was not their nation's name.

Right to Peaceful Protest
A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.


Category: Furtherment of Democracy
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Danistann

Description: Noting that there are thousands of nations out there that are organized or function in a way that the people who are governed feel that their government is inefficient, overbearing, cruel, corrupt, evil, etc.

Noting that governments often go through Democratic reforms usually when large groups of citizens of that country organize and peacefully protest against the government and/or its policies.

Further noting that citizens have used protesting not only for furthering Democracy, but for strengthening Human rights, fighting abusive laws, fighting for the welfare of the common citizen, etc.

Alarmed that in many countries that governments have forbid people from having the right to peacefully protest in order for that government to strengthen its grip on the country and its people.

Further alarmed that when people do try to peacefully protest that psychotic governments resort to many tactics to disperse the crowd including but not limited to:
- Tear gas
- Riot police
- Opening fire on the protesters
- Using unnecessary force to diffuse the protests
- Mobilizing the military to disperse crowds, often resorting to the military opening fire on protesters.
- Mobilizing the air force and navy branches of the military to open fire on protesters to disperse them

Hereby does the following
1) Defines a peaceful protest as an organized group of unarmed people or peoples in one or many locations who have gathered in a public area or public areas to protest the functioning of a member nation government

2) Requires member nation governments to allow the protest(s) to continue unless there is undeniable or strong evidence that the crowd is armed and/or is threatening to cause damage to public/private property.

3) Creates the D.I.A. (Democracy In Action) to operate within the World Assembly to monitor peaceful protests in member nations and observe that no human rights regarding the right to protest are being violated, whether they be those of the protesters or those of non-protesting citizens

4) Requires the D.I.A. to identify which member nation governments are violating the people's right to protest and raise awareness about the oppressive activities of the member nation to the entire World Assembly

5) Gives the D.I.A. the power to REQUEST that the World Assembly freeze the assests of member nation governments that have resorted to heavy violence to fight mass protests and to an extension prevent the extension of Democracy.

6) Defines "heavy violence" as repeated events where a member nation government has used extreme, unnecessary, and/or lethal force against peaceful protesters in order to disperse the protesters and maintain a grip over the citizens of that member nation.

7) Defines "mass protests" as protests within member nations where numerous protests are occuring in multiple locations all for the same goal of either implementing Democracy or trying to reform member nation governments to become more democratic.

Legalize LSD
A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Legalize
Proposed by: Bulbophyllum pachyglos

Description: The World Assembly,
L.S.D refers to Lysergic acid diethylamide, a psychedelic drug illegal

ACKNOWLEDGING LSD causes distortions in thinking and feeling and its chemical structure causes hallucinations and delusions and changes.

ACKNOWLEDGING that usual doses of LSD in humans are approx. 1-2 micrograms per kg, to produce a mental and emotional experience, even though most trips contain 15-90 micrograms of acid; thus making it one of the most potent pharmacological agents known to mankind.


ACKNOWLEDGING that LSD does not cause any chronic physiological or neurological damage.

ACKNOWLEDGING that only one person has ever died of LSD overdose. However, this man died of because of his own ignorance.

ACKNOWLEDGING that LSD is less addictive than many legal drugs.

ACKNOWLEDGING that LSD has medical uses, where as alcohol and tobacco, do not.


ACKNOWLEDGING that LSD can be used to cure migraines and cluster headaches, it has a 45% success rate in curing alcoholism versus therapy's 12%, and therapists have had success in giving it to mental patients and taking it themselves to better understand schizophrenia.

A)Legalize LSD for medical uses.

1)Legalize psychiatric studies with LSD.
2)Legalize medical uses of LSD to treat migraines and cluster headaches.
3)Legalize therapeutical use of LSD.
4)Promote development and search of LSD for medical use.


B)Legalize LSD for recreational uses.

1)Permit the possesion of LSD.
2)Permit the consumption of LSD only in
3)Permit the production on LSD.

PROHIBITS nations from discriminating consumers of LSD.

Moronist Decisions wrote:

Flibbleites wrote:Illegal, Branding and it was submitted 4 times.

I thought it was more wrong council/category (should be SC/condemnations). It was not their nation's name.

Grays Harbor wrote:

Legalize LSD
A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Legalize
Proposed by: Bulbophyllum pachyglos

Description: The World Assembly,
L.S.D refers to Lysergic acid diethylamide, a psychedelic drug illegal

ACKNOWLEDGING LSD causes distortions in thinking and feeling and its chemical structure causes hallucinations and delusions and changes.

ACKNOWLEDGING that usual doses of LSD in humans are approx. 1-2 micrograms per kg, to produce a mental and emotional experience, even though most trips contain 15-90 micrograms of acid; thus making it one of the most potent pharmacological agents known to mankind.


ACKNOWLEDGING that LSD does not cause any chronic physiological or neurological damage.

ACKNOWLEDGING that only one person has ever died of LSD overdose. However, this man died of because of his own ignorance.

ACKNOWLEDGING that LSD is less addictive than many legal drugs.

ACKNOWLEDGING that LSD has medical uses, where as alcohol and tobacco, do not.


ACKNOWLEDGING that LSD can be used to cure migraines and cluster headaches, it has a 45% success rate in curing alcoholism versus therapy's 12%, and therapists have had success in giving it to mental patients and taking it themselves to better understand schizophrenia.

A)Legalize LSD for medical uses.

1)Legalize psychiatric studies with LSD.
2)Legalize medical uses of LSD to treat migraines and cluster headaches.
3)Legalize therapeutical use of LSD.
4)Promote development and search of LSD for medical use.


B)Legalize LSD for recreational uses.

1)Permit the possesion of LSD.
2)Permit the consumption of LSD only in
3)Permit the production on LSD.

PROHIBITS nations from discriminating consumers of LSD.

Well, at least its not just another "make weed legal, man" proposal.

Grays Harbor wrote:

Right to Peaceful Protest
A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.


Category: Furtherment of Democracy
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Danistann

Description: Noting that there are thousands of nations out there that are organized or function in a way that the people who are governed feel that their government is inefficient, overbearing, cruel, corrupt, evil, etc.

Noting that governments often go through Democratic reforms usually when large groups of citizens of that country organize and peacefully protest against the government and/or its policies.

Further noting that citizens have used protesting not only for furthering Democracy, but for strengthening Human rights, fighting abusive laws, fighting for the welfare of the common citizen, etc.

Alarmed that in many countries that governments have forbid people from having the right to peacefully protest in order for that government to strengthen its grip on the country and its people.

Further alarmed that when people do try to peacefully protest that psychotic governments resort to many tactics to disperse the crowd including but not limited to:
- Tear gas
- Riot police
- Opening fire on the protesters
- Using unnecessary force to diffuse the protests
- Mobilizing the military to disperse crowds, often resorting to the military opening fire on protesters.
- Mobilizing the air force and navy branches of the military to open fire on protesters to disperse them

Hereby does the following
1) Defines a peaceful protest as an organized group of unarmed people or peoples in one or many locations who have gathered in a public area or public areas to protest the functioning of a member nation government

2) Requires member nation governments to allow the protest(s) to continue unless there is undeniable or strong evidence that the crowd is armed and/or is threatening to cause damage to public/private property.

3) Creates the D.I.A. (Democracy In Action) to operate within the World Assembly to monitor peaceful protests in member nations and observe that no human rights regarding the right to protest are being violated, whether they be those of the protesters or those of non-protesting citizens

4) Requires the D.I.A. to identify which member nation governments are violating the people's right to protest and raise awareness about the oppressive activities of the member nation to the entire World Assembly

5) Gives the D.I.A. the power to REQUEST that the World Assembly freeze the assests of member nation governments that have resorted to heavy violence to fight mass protests and to an extension prevent the extension of Democracy.

6) Defines "heavy violence" as repeated events where a member nation government has used extreme, unnecessary, and/or lethal force against peaceful protesters in order to disperse the protesters and maintain a grip over the citizens of that member nation.

7) Defines "mass protests" as protests within member nations where numerous protests are occuring in multiple locations all for the same goal of either implementing Democracy or trying to reform member nation governments to become more democratic.

I am really starting to hate these "If its in the RL headlines we MUST have an NSWA resolution for it!!" It is also quite likely this is already covered under several other resolutions such as Freedom of Expression and the CoCR, I believe.

Flibbleites wrote:

Moronist Decisions wrote:
I thought it was more wrong council/category (should be SC/condemnations). It was not their nation's name.

It's still the name of a nation and since it's not being used as a co-author it's Branding.

Bears Armed wrote:

Flibbleites wrote:It's still the name of a nation and since it's not being used as a co-author it's Branding.

So if I were to create a nation simply called 'The'... ?

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: ghanara_1300116258
Repeal "Biological Weapons Conference"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal


Resolution: GA#65


Proposed by: Ghanara

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #65: Biological Weapons Conference (Category: Global Disarmament; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: While the World Assembly applauds the intent of Resolution #65, "Biological Weapons Conference," it notes the following flaws:

1. Due to the fact that “Biological Weapons Conference” has such a broad definition of “biological weapon,” (That definition being,
“1)Any form of an infectious or biological agent of any kind that is intended to cause death, permanent illness, or injury.
2)This includes but is not limited to biologically-derived toxins and poisons, living microorganisms [bacteria, protozoa, viruses, and fungi], and toxins [chemicals that are produced by microorganisms, plants, or animals].
3)Any synthetic agent that mimics agents listed in the above two sections.”)
many non-massively destructive weapons have been illegalized. For example, non-lethal tranquilizer darts (which implement either toxins or synthetic agents that mimic the effects thereof) may no longer legally be used against humans. In many cases, non-lethal toxins can be a better solution than conventional (lethal) weapons.

2. The illegalization of such a broad range of weapons harms economy and industry, on both a local and international scale. The production of biological weapons would have provided jobs for hundreds of thousands of citizens across the world, as well as stimulation of the economy by putting more products on the market.

3. “Biological Weapons Conference” puts WA member nations at a military disadvantage when dealing with non-member nations. A WA member nation must be allowed to have the same military capabilities as its potential enemies.

4. “Biological Weapons Conference” is counterproductive to the end it seeks to achieve. While this legislation does prohibit the use of highly damaging biological weapons, there are much more devastating weapons currently in existence—weapons that are not banned. Therefore, it makes sense to assume that with the ban of less destructive weapons, more destructive weapons will be used instead.

For the previous reasons listed, the World Assembly hereby repeals “Biological Weapons Conference.”

Approvals: 1 (Frenequesta)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 63 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 2 days 22 hours

Doomiedoomiedoom wrote:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: ghanara_1300116258
Repeal "Biological Weapons Conference"

A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal


Resolution: GA#65


Proposed by: Ghanara

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #65: Biological Weapons Conference (Category: Global Disarmament; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: While the World Assembly applauds the intent of Resolution #65, "Biological Weapons Conference," it notes the following flaws:

1. Due to the fact that “Biological Weapons Conference” has such a broad definition of “biological weapon,” (That definition being,
“1)Any form of an infectious or biological agent of any kind that is intended to cause death, permanent illness, or injury.
2)This includes but is not limited to biologically-derived toxins and poisons, living microorganisms [bacteria, protozoa, viruses, and fungi], and toxins [chemicals that are produced by microorganisms, plants, or animals].
3)Any synthetic agent that mimics agents listed in the above two sections.”)
many non-massively destructive weapons have been illegalized. For example, non-lethal tranquilizer darts (which implement either toxins or synthetic agents that mimic the effects thereof) may no longer legally be used against humans. In many cases, non-lethal toxins can be a better solution than conventional (lethal) weapons.

2. The illegalization of such a broad range of weapons harms economy and industry, on both a local and international scale. The production of biological weapons would have provided jobs for hundreds of thousands of citizens across the world, as well as stimulation of the economy by putting more products on the market.

3. “Biological Weapons Conference” puts WA member nations at a military disadvantage when dealing with non-member nations. A WA member nation must be allowed to have the same military capabilities as its potential enemies.

4. “Biological Weapons Conference” is counterproductive to the end it seeks to achieve. While this legislation does prohibit the use of highly damaging biological weapons, there are much more devastating weapons currently in existence—weapons that are not banned. Therefore, it makes sense to assume that with the ban of less destructive weapons, more destructive weapons will be used instead.

For the previous reasons listed, the World Assembly hereby repeals “Biological Weapons Conference.”

Approvals: 1 (Frenequesta)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 63 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 2 days 22 hours

And it appears again.....

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: danistann_1300081896
Counterfeit Medications Act

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Danistann

Description: Noting that each day across thousands of member nations that billions of prescription medications are bought and consumed by billions of people.

Acknowledging that the WA has enacted laws concerning consumer product safety, ethics in medication manufacturing, and laws to fight drug trafficking.

Concerned though that every year criminals manufacture counterfeit prescriptions to sell these phony drugs to pharmacies across many member nations.

Alarmed that these phony drugs impersonate other drugs but provide no effect or relief to the symptoms that people are suffering from and have taken the drug to alleviate.

Further alarmed that when people unknowingly trust these counterfeit drugs they are still going untreated and may be endangering their health.

Further alarmed that these phony drugs can actually cause further health complications which could severely jeopardize a person's health and be potentially lethal.

Noting that since prescription drugs must be granted to people by doctors, prescription medications do not count as consumer products since they are not available to all consumers, and thus are not regulated under any consumer protection laws.

Also noting that since prescription drugs are given by doctors to people for medical use, prescription medications are not considered drugs such as LSD or Marijuana, and thus are not regulated under anti drug laws and drug trafficking laws.

Also noting that these phony drugs cost drug and pharmaceutical companies millions of dollars every year because of illegal counterfeiting of prescription drugs.

Hereby does the following:
1) Defines a counterfeit drug as an drug made to mimic or copy the appearence of an existing drug but serves no medical purpose or function.

2) Defines a prescription drug and prescription medication as any drug, pill, tablet, etc that has been manufactured by drug companies for specific medical uses that may only be given to consumers by doctors.

This act also creates the P.M.P.A. (Prescription Medication Protection Agency) to

1) Examine the inventories of pharmacies both in stores and online to inspect the inventory of prescription drugs to locate any that have been counterfeited.

2) Seize and destroy any counterfeit medications that are found in pharmacies.

3) Work with Pharmacies to identify where these companies or organizations have purchased their inventory and also to work with pharmacies to inform any unsuspecting consumers who may have bought and used counterfeit prescription medications.

4) Inform and work with member nation police agencies to find people who knowingly manufacture, bought, and/or sold counterfeit medications to people or pharmacies.

5) Create a database of people who have been convicted or suspected of manufacturing or selling counterfeit drugs to people and/or pharmacies that is to be made available to all member nation governments to coordinate a universal effort to fight against prescription drug manufacturing and trafficking.

This Act authorizes the P.M.P.A. to inspect all shipments of prescription drugs being transported in bulk between any 2 member nations and seize any prescription medications that are found to be counterfeited.

Approvals: 5 (IIIIIDaoistsIIIII, Worldia555, Deckersburg, Jasarite, Indian Gangs)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 59 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 2 days 19 hours

2) Seize and destroy any counterfeit medications that are found in pharmacies.

Moronist Decisions wrote:

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Danistann

Description: Noting that each day across thousands of member nations that billions of prescription medications are bought and consumed by billions of people.

Acknowledging that the WA has enacted laws concerning consumer product safety, ethics in medication manufacturing, and laws to fight drug trafficking.

Concerned though that every year criminals manufacture counterfeit prescriptions to sell these phony drugs to pharmacies across many member nations.

Alarmed that these phony drugs impersonate other drugs but provide no effect or relief to the symptoms that people are suffering from and have taken the drug to alleviate.

Further alarmed that when people unknowingly trust these counterfeit drugs they are still going untreated and may be endangering their health.

Further alarmed that these phony drugs can actually cause further health complications which could severely jeopardize a person's health and be potentially lethal.

Noting that since prescription drugs must be granted to people by doctors, prescription medications do not count as consumer products since they are not available to all consumers, and thus are not regulated under any consumer protection laws.

Also noting that since prescription drugs are given by doctors to people for medical use, prescription medications are not considered drugs such as LSD or Marijuana, and thus are not regulated under anti drug laws and drug trafficking laws.

Also noting that these phony drugs cost drug and pharmaceutical companies millions of dollars every year because of illegal counterfeiting of prescription drugs.

Hereby does the following:
1) Defines a counterfeit drug as an drug made to mimic or copy the appearence of an existing drug but serves no medical purpose or function.

2) Defines a prescription drug and prescription medication as any drug, pill, tablet, etc that has been manufactured by drug companies for specific medical uses that may only be given to consumers by doctors.

This act also creates the P.M.P.A. (Prescription Medication Protection Agency) to

1) Examine the inventories of pharmacies both in stores and online to inspect the inventory of prescription drugs to locate any that have been counterfeited.

2) Seize and destroy any counterfeit medications that are found in pharmacies.

3) Work with Pharmacies to identify where these companies or organizations have purchased their inventory and also to work with pharmacies to inform any unsuspecting consumers who may have bought and used counterfeit prescription medications.

4) Inform and work with member nation police agencies to find people who knowingly manufacture, bought, and/or sold counterfeit medications to people or pharmacies.

5) Create a database of people who have been convicted or suspected of manufacturing or selling counterfeit drugs to people and/or pharmacies that is to be made available to all member nation governments to coordinate a universal effort to fight against prescription drug manufacturing and trafficking.

This Act authorizes the P.M.P.A. to inspect all shipments of prescription drugs being transported in bulk between any 2 member nations and seize any prescription medications that are found to be counterfeited.

Approvals: 5 (IIIIIDaoistsIIIII, Worldia555, Deckersburg, Jasarite, Indian Gangs)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 59 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 2 days 19 hours

Wouldn't

2) Seize and destroy any counterfeit medications that are found in pharmacies.

contradict the ban on a WA Police Force?

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: gullo_1300144134
World Assembly Forces

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Gullo

Description: AFFIRMING that there should be peace as well as certain unalienable rights for individuals and those rights should be protected.

DECLARES that a general military which consists of land, naval, and air force should be created as a World Assembly military in order to defend the rights of the people and to ensure stability. However, these forces can only be used by a procedural vote by the World Assembly to ensure that they are being used properly.

Therefore, if this bill were to be passed, a military for use by the World Assembly shall be established and can be used to defend basic human rights, with the permission of the World Assembly.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 64 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 4 hours

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: israeli-gimmel_1300142060
Allowance of Embassies

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Israeli-Gimmel

Description: Allowance of Embassies

Article I - DEFINE that embassies are a building or group of buildings of a foreign country within your country in which trade, commerce, and diplomatic negotiations take place

Article II - STATE that any country may establish an embassy within your country, whether friend or foe.

Article III - BAN the refusal of allowing a country to establish an embassy.

Artcile IV - STATE that embassies are used for the following purposes:
Conducting international trade
Conducting diplomatic negotiations
Persecuting foreign criminals, and
Signing treaties of any sort.

Article V - STATE that embassies may house emergency reserve soldiers/police from that country.

Article VI - STATE that these emergency reserves cannot be used to declare war on the country that the embassy is in.

Article VII - STATE that if any country within the World Assembly breaks the rules of Embassies stated in this resolution shall be be on trial and persecuted appropiately.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 64 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 4 hours

Repeal "Patient's Rights Act"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation


Category: Repeal
Resolution: GA#29
Proposed by: Tinis

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #29: Patient's Rights Act (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: CITING International debate with regards to informed consent of individuals with regards to medical practices,

ACKNOWLEDGING The good provided by General Assembly Resolution # 29, "Patient's Rights Act", for the citizens of the World Assembly, but

CITING The inability to directly amend World Assembly Resolutions to provide clarity of language, and most importantly,

ADDRESSING the need for section 8 of G.A.R. #29 to be corrected so that the term 'may' is either made clear or replaced with a better term to determine the question of does language demands that a legal guardian act as the "patient" or if there is wiggle room for a government to prevent such a default for purposes of consent,

GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION #29 is REPEALED.

FURTHERMORE, the author of this repeal goes on record supporting a replacement to G.A.R. #29 that makes clear the ambiguity cited.

Moronist Decisions wrote:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL
ID: israeli-gimmel_1300142060
Allowance of Embassies

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Israeli-Gimmel

Description: Allowance of Embassies

Article I - DEFINE that embassies are a building or group of buildings of a foreign country within your country in which trade, commerce, and diplomatic negotiations take place

Article II - STATE that any country may establish an embassy within your country, whether friend or foe.

Article III - BAN the refusal of allowing a country to establish an embassy.

Artcile IV - STATE that embassies are used for the following purposes:
Conducting international trade
Conducting diplomatic negotiations
Persecuting foreign criminals, and
Signing treaties of any sort.

Article V - STATE that embassies may house emergency reserve soldiers/police from that country.

Article VI - STATE that these emergency reserves cannot be used to declare war on the country that the embassy is in.

Article VII - STATE that if any country within the World Assembly breaks the rules of Embassies stated in this resolution shall be be on trial and persecuted appropiately.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 64 more approvals)

Voting Ends: in 3 days 4 hours

How are we supposed to persecute countries who violate this without metagaming?

(added) also, how is this free trade?

Legalize Peeing In The Public

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Frostaland

Description: ACKNOWLEDGES that many nations of WA have either legalized or unlegalized public peeing.
DECLARES to clean this mess up.
NOTES:
§1 That many nations have small amounts of or even no public toilets.
§2 That things that people pee with should be not seen by anyone else without permission
§3 That some people really need to pee now.
OBLIGES all WA nations to legalize peeing in the public or build more public toilets

Kryozerkia wrote:

Legalize Peeing In The Public

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Frostaland

Description: ACKNOWLEDGES that many nations of WA have either legalized or unlegalized public peeing.
DECLARES to clean this mess up.
NOTES:
§1 That many nations have small amounts of or even no public toilets.
§2 That things that people pee with should be not seen by anyone else without permission
§3 That some people really need to pee now.
OBLIGES all WA nations to legalize peeing in the public or build more public toilets

Bloody stupid would be a compliment.

Bears Armed wrote:

Kryozerkia wrote:Bloody stupid would be a compliment.

Looking at this, especially clause 3, I really have to wonder whether its author recently had trouble finding a public toilet when they needed one...

Bears Armed wrote:

Kryozerkia wrote:Bloody stupid would be a compliment.

Looking at this, especially clause 3, I really have to wonder whether its author recently had trouble finding a public toilet when they needed one...