NationStates

Link: https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1681837104

The Security Council,

Aghast that the region of The Communist Bloc has engaged in the flippant ravaging of native communities since the establishment of their modern military,

Clarifying that among The Communist Bloc’s victims are often regions with vibrant and storied communities such as The Mystical Council, which was displaced by an occupation in 2022,

Affirming that many of these small communities The Communist Bloc marauds consists of peaceful nations that have attempted to maintain a stable, undisturbed existence,

Alarmed by The Communist Bloc’s pattern of deceiving nations in an effort to enlist them into supporting the People’s Revolutionary Air Force (PRAF) in their brutal occupations, claiming justification under a thin veneer of progressive causes to disguise their ulterior and destructive motives,

Concerned that, should The Communist Bloc be allowed to complete this structural transition, their government will be strengthened, and emboldened in their efforts to wreak havoc upon innocent communities,

Optimistic that the passage of this resolution will serve as a hindrance to The Communist Bloc’s efforts to harm peaceful, inoffensive communities across the multiverse, or otherwise undermine their attempts at stability and growth,

Hereby injuncts The Communist Bloc.

Co-author: PhDre

Support.

I was wondering who was gonna get to it first.

Full support

Full support from me as well.

This does not surprise me at all.

Two people have posted here since I wrote that

Quebecshire wrote:Full support

Kazaman wrote:Full support from me as well.

Zabloing wrote:Support.

least astroturfed security council thread

This reminds me of something from a time past...

As I remarked to Gleg off-site, I do find it funny that I was talking about this exact thing last night to Q. Regardless, full support from me.

Bound to happen.

if anyone wants more proof that defenderdom doesn't actually care about the wishes of natives and merely wants to force regions that don't agree with them to fall in line, look no further

Wascoitan wrote:if anyone wants more proof that defenderdom doesn't actually care about the wishes of natives and merely wants to force regions that don't agree with them to fall in line, look no further

It is perfectly rational to oppose having new nations be founded in overtly ideologically extreme regions.

Wascoitan wrote:if anyone wants more proof that defenderdom doesn't actually care about the wishes of natives and merely wants to force regions that don't agree with them to fall in line, look no further

Gleg and PhDre aren't defenders, for one. For two, maybe TCB should do less griefing.

There's plenty to criticize us for, find better things.

Fort Concord wrote:

Wascoitan wrote:if anyone wants more proof that defenderdom doesn't actually care about the wishes of natives and merely wants to force regions that don't agree with them to fall in line, look no further

Gleg and PhDre aren't defenders, for one. For two, maybe TCB should do less griefing.

There's plenty to criticize us for, find better things.

Quebecshire wrote:Full support

noted non-defender *checks notes* Quebecshire?

Opposed, as the Delegate of a region that TCB once helped invade but is now a strong ally to.

Devious wrote:

Fort Concord wrote:Gleg and PhDre aren't defenders, for one. For two, maybe TCB should do less griefing.

There's plenty to criticize us for, find better things.

Quebecshire wrote:Full support

noted non-defender *checks notes* Quebecshire?

Big if true.

TCB is pretty evil and vile. Indie or not we truly deserve this for sure. Good work guys.

This is very obviously a politically motivated attack that does not accurately present the region and its actions. TCB is cool.

Speedrunning badge running, three, two, one.

Hey, while we are at this and all, can we get Confederation of Corrupt Dictators too?

Ah, what a Security Council tradition. New mechanics have been introduced to the SC, and one of the first things the WASC defender-aligned clique does is to abuse those mechanics to punish regions they don't like and who don't align with them.

"Regional sovereignty is super important and paramount, except if we don't like the region, in which case we will happily throw regional sovereignty into the Mariana Trench for all eternity"

Also with the double edged sword of preventing people from being founded in an explicitly communist region. Nice bonus If it passes.

I am happy to support this, draft looks good and gives good reasoning to support

A necessary and proper step to take.

Thank you WritingLegend and PhDre for addressing this pertinent issue.

I'm not someone that usually speaks out on the forums especially about WA proposals but I feel like I should on this one as I'm not sure to even understand why this is a proposition in the first place.
Is this just a case of "They do some raiding so they kinda deserve it"?
If that's all there is to it I guess it's my fault for expecting things to be amicable as the update drops out and thinking that everyone should have the right to enjoy the new features, especially if they are a long time founderless region with a strong standing, I guess.

I'm against this as a matter of principle, I don't want a situation where the smallest thing can get your region to get an injuction, this is the first proposition like this, and I feel like it passing would set a bad example for the WA as a whole.
I want to believe in an equality of opportunity and I'm not sure what stops any region from getting injucted and basically being denied access to the new feature for any small reasons, if the largest UCR gets hit by it because of that. Not a precedent I'm willing to have around, especially being member of a currently founderless region, that I would not like to see being injuct just because some people felt like it wether we actually want to do anything with it or not.

I do appreciate defenders spending their effort defending region around the site nonetheless I would rather Injuct keep at ones with good intent. I certainly don't want to see this devolve in a "You can do whatever you want as long as we are fine with it" situation, now or in the future, it would not be healthy for the site at all.

Dimitri Angelopoulov enters his office, sits down at his desk, flips through the proposals that have piled up, stops at this one, and reads it thrice.

"Jesus, Mary and Joseph, and the wee donkey..."

He gets up, forcefully bangs his head against the wall a couple dozen times, decides he's already had enough for the day, and heads home.

OOC: No but srsly wtah