Advertisement
by Lenlyvit » Thu Nov 10, 2022 3:26 am
by PhilTech » Thu Nov 10, 2022 4:36 am
by Platoon of Peace » Thu Nov 10, 2022 6:47 am
-Northumbria wrote:Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Condemn Creeperopolis was passed 13,700 votes to 2,417.
Congratulations to Creeper and well done Quebec.
Another defeat for -Northumbria.
What do you mean? I wasn't at vote, and of course the electorate is going to look at it and go "Wow so evil! We need to condemn this person!". If you want to talk about symbolic defeats, this is more a defeat for standards in the Security Council; in case the Gameplayers supporting this didn't realise, this is the RP equivalent of condemning someone for tag-raiding half a dozen times.
by -Northumbria » Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:08 am
Platoon of Peace wrote:Congrats on a well deserved condemn!-Northumbria wrote:What do you mean? I wasn't at vote, and of course the electorate is going to look at it and go "Wow so evil! We need to condemn this person!". If you want to talk about symbolic defeats, this is more a defeat for standards in the Security Council; in case the Gameplayers supporting this didn't realise, this is the RP equivalent of condemning someone for tag-raiding half a dozen times.
a. no it isn't some defeat for the standards. This was a well-written draft on a person who deserved it. RMB rp is just as good as forum rp
b. why were you so incredibly opposed? I don't get it, really. It seems your only complaint is that they do this stuff on RMB.
by Platoon of Peace » Thu Nov 10, 2022 9:04 am
-Northumbria wrote:Platoon of Peace wrote:Congrats on a well deserved condemn!
a. no it isn't some defeat for the standards. This was a well-written draft on a person who deserved it. RMB rp is just as good as forum rp
b. why were you so incredibly opposed? I don't get it, really. It seems your only complaint is that they do this stuff on RMB.
Obviously you did not read my posts. If you wish to engage with me please first read what I have written.
by Racoda » Thu Nov 10, 2022 11:03 am
Platoon of Peace wrote:-Northumbria wrote:Obviously you did not read my posts. If you wish to engage with me please first read what I have written.
Bro, if you wanna be a condescending prick, at least be a successful condescending prick. I'm well aware that you feel that he's not worthy of the badge. But I didn't really find a clear reason as to why. If you'd like to dispose your wealth of knowledge which I'm clearly not worthy of, please do so.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement