Anne of Cleves in TNP wrote:“It is well-written, but I am very concerned on the ‘Understanding’ and ‘Disappointment’ clauses. Those clauses essentially put the ‘primary functions of schools’ as being just as important, if not more important than LGBTQ+ rights, which I highly doubt would be supported by a majority of the universe. Due to this potentially-controversial nature, I am doubting the objectivity of those clauses. Can you please clarify those clauses?”
-Ms. Charlotte Schafer, WA Ambassador for the Clevesian Empire
Firstly, the Understanding and Disappointed clauses do not refer to any clause regarding ‘LGBTQ+ rights’. Do they support and help LGBTQ people? Yes, but they’re not fundamental rights. Anyways, the thing is, most students who are minors would already be enrolled in schools which they spend most of their day in, and would already have access to these. Forcing supplementary institutions to expend resources on functions already provided by mainstream schools will ruin them financially.
-Benji