[PASSED] Commend Bran Astor

[Varanius]

Welcome back from retirement

Could you please address the point...?

No.

[Araznan]

Very Well Written, Full Support!

[Apatosaurus]

Could you please address the point...?

No.

A convenient attitude, but not one that would necessarily attract support.

[Honeydewistania]

Welcome back from retirement

Could you please address the point...?

Ngl, you're the last person that should be talking about laundry lists in SC proposals

[Fachumonn]

Could you please address the point...?

Ngl, you're the last person that should be talking about laundry lists in SC proposals

And how does that prevent him from critiquing other laundry lists?

[The Orwell Society]

Full support! One of most well-written drafts I've read so far, excellent job. This will definitely do well if (when) it comes to vote.

[Honeydewistania]

Ngl, you're the last person that should be talking about laundry lists in SC proposals

And how does that prevent him from critiquing other laundry lists?

Makes sense. We always need the experts to weigh in

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

Very nice job Vara, well researched etc., etc. Look forward to voting in support of this as it has now made quorum.

And will go to vote at minor update today.

[Madjack]

Could you please address the point...?

No.

What if I asked you to address the point?

[Goobergunchia]

What if I asked you all to discontinue the threadjack?

[Xeknos]

Voting FOR because this appears to have ruffled a few feathers.

[Apatosaurus]

I suppose clout and popularity of authors is more important than proposal quality or even nominees.

[Fachumonn]

I suppose clout and popularity of authors is more important than proposal quality or even nominees.

I wouldn't say it was that poorly written.

[Honeydewistania]

I suppose clout and popularity of authors is more important than proposal quality or even nominees.

You should try repealing it then

[WayNeacTia]

I suppose clout and popularity of authors is more important than proposal quality or even nominees.

Attitude plays a big part as well.....

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

I suppose clout and popularity of authors is more important than proposal quality or even nominees.

I’d throw those grapes out if I were you - I think they’re sour.

[Free Algerstonia]

I suppose clout and popularity of authors is more important than proposal quality or even nominees.

I’d throw those grapes out if I were you - I think they’re sour.

haha grape

[Team Leo]

Horribly written. No support.

[The Orwell Society]

Horribly written. No support.

And how the hell does this classify as "horribly written" and deserving of "no support" in your proffessional, infinitely-wise holiness?

[Team Leo]

Horribly written. No support.

And how the hell does this classify as "horribly written" and deserving of "no support" in your proffessional, infinitely-wise holiness?

Clauses not made correctly, not enough detail, etc...

[The Orwell Society]

And how the hell does this classify as "horribly written" and deserving of "no support" in your proffessional, infinitely-wise holiness?

Clauses not made correctly, not enough detail, etc...

For one, the clauses are constructed just as any other commendation should be. For two, there is plenty of detail, and any more would pass the character limit for submission. For three, this is passing on a near ten-to-one ratio. For four, since when do you have enough SC experience to call a perfectly good resolution that the author worked hard on "horrible"?

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

Horribly written. No support.

And this from someone whose efforts in the SC are best described as “barely literate”. To be honest you wouldn’t know a well written proposal if it got up and smacked you around the head with a kipper.

[Team Leo]

Clauses not made correctly, not enough detail, etc...

For one, the clauses are constructed just as any other commendation should be. For two, there is plenty of detail, and any more would pass the character limit for submission. For three, this is passing on a near ten-to-one ratio. For four, since when do you have enough SC experience to call a perfectly good resolution that the author worked hard on "horrible"?

I have plently of experience. Just ask God for his opinion. Bran Astor has commited too much sin!

Horribly written. No support.

And this from someone whose efforts in the SC are best described as “barely literate”. To be honest you wouldn’t know a well written proposal if it got up and smacked you around the head with a kipper.

Actually, I have done a lot more. I helped almost get a proposal (not written by y'all type of people) to quorom, using my special WA powers. Also wtf is a kipper? No one uses that language no more.

[Bhang Bhang Duc]

For one, the clauses are constructed just as any other commendation should be. For two, there is plenty of detail, and any more would pass the character limit for submission. For three, this is passing on a near ten-to-one ratio. For four, since when do you have enough SC experience to call a perfectly good resolution that the author worked hard on "horrible"?

I have plently of experience. Just ask God for his opinion. Bran Astor has commited too much sin!

And this from someone whose efforts in the SC are best described as “barely literate”. To be honest you wouldn’t know a well written proposal if it got up and smacked you around the head with a kipper.

Actually, I have done a lot more. I helped almost get a proposal (not written by y'all type of people) to quorom, using my special WA powers. Also wtf is a kipper? No one uses that language no more.

Who is this God person you are talking about?

A kipper is a fat herring (caught in season) that has been split through the back, gutted, opened flat, salted or brined to reduce its water content and then cold smoked. This is a process that cures and dries the fish while imparting a smoky flavour, without exposing it to heat. How can you not know this. Also quorum is spelt .....um, not ....om.

[The Orwell Society]

For one, the clauses are constructed just as any other commendation should be. For two, there is plenty of detail, and any more would pass the character limit for submission. For three, this is passing on a near ten-to-one ratio. For four, since when do you have enough SC experience to call a perfectly good resolution that the author worked hard on "horrible"?

I have plently of experience. Just ask God for his opinion. Bran Astor has commited too much sin!

And this from someone whose efforts in the SC are best described as “barely literate”. To be honest you wouldn’t know a well written proposal if it got up and smacked you around the head with a kipper.

Actually, I have done a lot more. I helped almost get a proposal (not written by y'all type of people) to quorom, using my special WA powers. Also wtf is a kipper? No one uses that language no more.

Your "special WA powers"? Next you're gonna claim to be Max Barry, I just know it.