Advertisement
by A mean old man » Mon May 24, 2010 5:29 pm
by Denecaep » Mon May 24, 2010 5:33 pm
Unibot wrote:Denecaep wrote:
A not well known ambassador walked over to the Unibot ambassador. "Hello, sir. I am fairly new to this. Though we've been voting in the World Assembly for years, we just now are becoming more active. I've been of absence lately. Could you please tell me what exactly the agreement is for members of the Third Wall Bloc?"
Eduard spoke one famous idiom, "If Pigs could fl.." before exploding in time and in space.
OOC: Take a look at the link in my sig, or the updated duplicate of that thread being run on the West Pacific (you will have to join TWP forums for it to view properly)
by Flibbleites » Mon May 24, 2010 5:49 pm
Denecaep wrote:Unibot wrote:Denecaep wrote:
A not well known ambassador walked over to the Unibot ambassador. "Hello, sir. I am fairly new to this. Though we've been voting in the World Assembly for years, we just now are becoming more active. I've been of absence lately. Could you please tell me what exactly the agreement is for members of the Third Wall Bloc?"
Eduard spoke one famous idiom, "If Pigs could fl.." before exploding in time and in space.
OOC: Take a look at the link in my sig, or the updated duplicate of that thread being run on the West Pacific (you will have to join TWP forums for it to view properly)
"So then, sir, let me ask you another question. Since you are voting against resolutions that comply to rule IV, and any resolutions that don't comply will be removed by mods, does that mean you are basically voting against every current resolution that comes to vote? Thank you."
by Kalibarr » Mon May 24, 2010 5:54 pm
Flibbleites wrote:Denecaep wrote:Unibot wrote:Denecaep wrote:
A not well known ambassador walked over to the Unibot ambassador. "Hello, sir. I am fairly new to this. Though we've been voting in the World Assembly for years, we just now are becoming more active. I've been of absence lately. Could you please tell me what exactly the agreement is for members of the Third Wall Bloc?"
Eduard spoke one famous idiom, "If Pigs could fl.." before exploding in time and in space.
OOC: Take a look at the link in my sig, or the updated duplicate of that thread being run on the West Pacific (you will have to join TWP forums for it to view properly)
"So then, sir, let me ask you another question. Since you are voting against resolutions that comply to rule IV, and any resolutions that don't comply will be removed by mods, does that mean you are basically voting against every current resolution that comes to vote? Thank you."
From what I've seen, that would be a fairly accurate assessment of their plan.
by Denecaep » Mon May 24, 2010 6:17 pm
Kalibarr wrote:Flibbleites wrote:Denecaep wrote:Unibot wrote:Denecaep wrote:
A not well known ambassador walked over to the Unibot ambassador. "Hello, sir. I am fairly new to this. Though we've been voting in the World Assembly for years, we just now are becoming more active. I've been of absence lately. Could you please tell me what exactly the agreement is for members of the Third Wall Bloc?"
Eduard spoke one famous idiom, "If Pigs could fl.." before exploding in time and in space.
OOC: Take a look at the link in my sig, or the updated duplicate of that thread being run on the West Pacific (you will have to join TWP forums for it to view properly)
"So then, sir, let me ask you another question. Since you are voting against resolutions that comply to rule IV, and any resolutions that don't comply will be removed by mods, does that mean you are basically voting against every current resolution that comes to vote? Thank you."
From what I've seen, that would be a fairly accurate assessment of their plan.
I believe we have said as much...
by Naivetry » Mon May 24, 2010 6:25 pm
Topid wrote:And the whole re-sort thing would mean that only the people that looked at the WA page over the next 12 hours would know...
*cough* Change *cough* it back! *cough*
by A mean old man » Mon May 24, 2010 6:50 pm
by Unibot » Mon May 24, 2010 7:08 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Todd McCloud » Mon May 24, 2010 7:14 pm
A mean old man wrote:This is the last commendation of me that will reach quorum.
by A mean old man » Mon May 24, 2010 7:52 pm
Todd McCloud wrote:Everyone has their dark hours on here. People can and do recover. You will. And this really isn't about you anyway - unfortunately, you're more or less caught in the crossfire of this rule 4 debacle. This too shall pass.
And this another reason why we need this rule 4 stuff resolved very quickly.
by Krioval » Mon May 24, 2010 9:17 pm
by Todd McCloud » Mon May 24, 2010 9:26 pm
Krioval wrote:
AMOM, I may not agree with you on everything. In fact, I may disagree with you on many things. But I do think that you don't deserve to be used by certain individuals to pursue a political agenda. And those individuals owe you an apology.
by Maryginia » Mon May 24, 2010 9:36 pm
by Ardchoille » Tue May 25, 2010 12:53 am
Naivetry wrote:<snip>You can hand out warnings, and I understand that I may be earning my first right now. But you can't force people to vote on or discuss only the text and the subject of this Commendation when voting is the only way you've left us to express our disagreement.
by Freyr Land » Tue May 25, 2010 1:56 am
by Doitzel » Tue May 25, 2010 2:09 am
by Enn » Tue May 25, 2010 3:36 am
by Darkesia » Tue May 25, 2010 4:11 am
by GRiMMNeSS » Tue May 25, 2010 4:19 am
by JURISDICTIONS » Tue May 25, 2010 6:12 am
Takaram wrote:Irony. Rule 4 prevents a repeal based on Rule 4 violations, meaning that Rule 4 does not comply with Rule 4. It should be struck down.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement