Professor Albus Dumbledore wrote:It's better then any proposal you could write.
I rather suspect that BBD would be a far superior author on any draft of a proposal they may care to write than you've demonstrated.
Advertisement
by Lord Dominator » Wed Mar 16, 2022 9:32 pm
Professor Albus Dumbledore wrote:It's better then any proposal you could write.
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Thu Mar 17, 2022 12:47 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Professor Albus Dumbledore » Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:19 am
by Fachumonn » Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:47 am
by Madjack » Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:24 am
by Dawn Denac » Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:48 am
by Numero Capitan » Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:57 am
by Dawn Denac » Thu Mar 17, 2022 12:09 pm
by Guess and Check » Thu Mar 17, 2022 12:33 pm
by Reberydinigzadaland » Thu Mar 17, 2022 1:55 pm
by Fachumonn » Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:02 pm
Reberydinigzadaland wrote:The fact that this proposal is getting so many votes against it means that the people who vote against it are supporting raiders or don't know how to read please I suggest you vote For on this proposal to crack down on raiders
by Reberydinigzadaland » Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:08 pm
Fachumonn wrote:Reberydinigzadaland wrote:The fact that this proposal is getting so many votes against it means that the people who vote against it are supporting raiders or don't know how to read please I suggest you vote For on this proposal to crack down on raiders
What you're not realizing is that the proposal in question here was written by long time-raider for The Black Hawks, and is basically just looking for a self-recognition here. So, in fact, it's YOU who is the one who isn't reading.
by Fachumonn » Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:09 pm
Reberydinigzadaland wrote:Fachumonn wrote:
What you're not realizing is that the proposal in question here was written by long time-raider for The Black Hawks, and is basically just looking for a self-recognition here. So, in fact, it's YOU who is the one who isn't reading.
You can't just take someones backgrounds into account when voting on this you must prioritize the actual proposal over the person who is making it and your telling me to read when that's not even on the proposal so you might wanna read
by Reberydinigzadaland » Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:14 pm
Fachumonn wrote:Reberydinigzadaland wrote:You can't just take someones backgrounds into account when voting on this you must prioritize the actual proposal over the person who is making it and your telling me to read when that's not even on the proposal so you might wanna read
Listen, I don't wanna argue, but for raiders, condemning is basically a commend for them. It does nothing but fuel their egos.
by Fachumonn » Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:17 pm
Reberydinigzadaland wrote:Fachumonn wrote:Listen, I don't wanna argue, but for raiders, condemning is basically a commend for them. It does nothing but fuel their egos.
Then maybe they should go to a therapist because that sounds like a them problem because if the UN hated me I wouldn't take that as a good thing
by Reberydinigzadaland » Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:22 pm
Fachumonn wrote:Reberydinigzadaland wrote:Then maybe they should go to a therapist because that sounds like a them problem because if the UN hated me I wouldn't take that as a good thing
I think you are misunderstood. Condemnation is a recognition of a nation or region for playing the villain well. Raiders want to be recognized for playing the villain well. This is as close as a self-condemnation can get in a declaration.
by Platoon of Peace » Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:29 pm
Fachumonn wrote:Reberydinigzadaland wrote:Then maybe they should go to a therapist because that sounds like a them problem because if the UN hated me I wouldn't take that as a good thing
I think you are misunderstood. Condemnation is a recognition of a nation or region for playing the villain well. Raiders want to be recognized for playing the villain well. This is as close as a self-condemnation can get in a declaration.
by Fachumonn » Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:32 pm
Reberydinigzadaland wrote:Fachumonn wrote:I think you are misunderstood. Condemnation is a recognition of a nation or region for playing the villain well. Raiders want to be recognized for playing the villain well. This is as close as a self-condemnation can get in a declaration.
When a nation gets condemned that could be a sign to ban them from your region
by WayNeacTia » Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:55 pm
Reberydinigzadaland wrote:Fachumonn wrote:Listen, I don't wanna argue, but for raiders, condemning is basically a commend for them. It does nothing but fuel their egos.
Then maybe they should go to a therapist because that sounds like a them problem because if the UN hated me I wouldn't take that as a good thing
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Penguin Dictators » Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:17 am
Platoon of Peace wrote:Fachumonn wrote:I think you are misunderstood. Condemnation is a recognition of a nation or region for playing the villain well. Raiders want to be recognized for playing the villain well. This is as close as a self-condemnation can get in a declaration.
This is a great description. "playing the character well". I don't know why but I love this description.
by Orifna » Fri Mar 18, 2022 1:28 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement