Lol Wayne. They've answered 55 issues (more than you have) and been in WA since 2015 (which is as far back as the Texas records go)
Advertisement
by Apatosaurus » Sun Jan 02, 2022 8:54 pm
by WayNeacTia » Sun Jan 02, 2022 8:54 pm
Refuge Isle wrote:Wayneactia wrote:Wow…. A puppet that hasn’t answered any issues and has a grand sum of eight whole forum posts (including this one) is all that is needed for native support huh?
I understand that you've dispensed delusions of Trovons, China, and whatever else being false flag ops by defenders. But suggesting that a delegate of five and a half years is a defender plant is breaking into a new level of alternate reality timelines.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Morover » Sun Jan 02, 2022 8:56 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Refuge Isle wrote:
I understand that you've dispensed delusions of Trovons, China, and whatever else being false flag ops by defenders. But suggesting that a delegate of five and a half years is a defender plant is breaking into a new level of alternate reality timelines.
I never stated they were a defender plant. They have had exactly the same level of activity in the region as Vandoosa has had over the last few years. So what makes their claim any more valid than Vandoosa’s claim?
by Apatosaurus » Sun Jan 02, 2022 8:57 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Refuge Isle wrote:
I understand that you've dispensed delusions of Trovons, China, and whatever else being false flag ops by defenders. But suggesting that a delegate of five and a half years is a defender plant is breaking into a new level of alternate reality timelines.
I never stated they were a defender plant. They have had exactly the same level of activity in the region as Vandoosa has had over the last few years. So what makes their claim any more valid than Vandoosa’s claim?
by WayNeacTia » Sun Jan 02, 2022 8:57 pm
Apatosaurus wrote:Wayneactia wrote:Wow…. A puppet that hasn’t answered any issues and has a grand sum of eight whole forum posts (including this one) is all that is needed for native support huh?
Lol Wayne. They've answered 55 issues (more than you have) and been in WA since 2015 (which is as far back as the Texas records go)
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Emodea » Sun Jan 02, 2022 8:58 pm
Garchyland wrote:I am in full support of this resolution and thank the community for proposing this with such haste.
by Wascoitan » Sun Jan 02, 2022 9:06 pm
Apatosaurus wrote:Wayneactia wrote:I never stated they were a defender plant. They have had exactly the same level of activity in the region as Vandoosa has had over the last few years. So what makes their claim any more valid than Vandoosa’s claim?
would have lost all native-hood by betraying the region to region crashers.
by Frenchy II » Sun Jan 02, 2022 9:16 pm
Wayneactia wrote:
That doesn’t mean fuck all and if you would stop running your mouth for a few minutes you would know this. Lots of people keep their WA on a puppet.
by Refuge Isle » Sun Jan 02, 2022 9:19 pm
Wayneactia wrote:
That doesn’t mean fuck all and if you would stop running your mouth for a few minutes you would know this. Lots of people keep their WA on a puppet.
by Apatosaurus » Sun Jan 02, 2022 9:21 pm
Wayneactia wrote:and if you would stop running your mouth for a few minutes you would know this. Lots of people keep their WA on a puppet.
by WayNeacTia » Sun Jan 02, 2022 9:34 pm
Frenchy II wrote:Wayneactia wrote:That doesn’t mean fuck all and if you would stop running your mouth for a few minutes you would know this. Lots of people keep their WA on a puppet.
Now tell me this. A Liberal Haven, a not so prominent target in the modern meta, generally forgotten among raiders, will be held by a SINGLE DEFENDER PLANT, in a time where the R/D meta has drastically changed. Please, remove your cranium from your rectal cavity and stop rattling off more conspiracy theories than Alex Jones.
Apatosaurus wrote:Wayneactia wrote:and if you would stop running your mouth for a few minutes you would know this. Lots of people keep their WA on a puppet.
What would anyone have to gain from said infiltration of A Liberal Haven? If they were a raider plant, they wouldn't be actively supporting this liberation in the thread and probably even helping the raiders here.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Apatosaurus » Sun Jan 02, 2022 9:36 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Frenchy II wrote:Now tell me this. A Liberal Haven, a not so prominent target in the modern meta, generally forgotten among raiders, will be held by a SINGLE DEFENDER PLANT, in a time where the R/D meta has drastically changed. Please, remove your cranium from your rectal cavity and stop rattling off more conspiracy theories than Alex Jones.
I have never once said Garchyland is a puppet of a defender. I simply asked why their claims on the region take precedence over Vandy's when they have had about the same level of activity in the region over the last few years. Perhaps you should learn to read what was actually typed instead of those hidden magical sentences you seem to like to hallucinate.
by Morover » Sun Jan 02, 2022 9:37 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Frenchy II wrote:Now tell me this. A Liberal Haven, a not so prominent target in the modern meta, generally forgotten among raiders, will be held by a SINGLE DEFENDER PLANT, in a time where the R/D meta has drastically changed. Please, remove your cranium from your rectal cavity and stop rattling off more conspiracy theories than Alex Jones.
I have never once said Garchyland is a puppet of a defender. I simply asked why their claims on the region take precedence over Vandy's when they have had about the same level of activity in the region over the last few years. Perhaps you should learn to read what was actually typed instead of those hidden magical sentences you seem to like to hallucinate.
by WayNeacTia » Sun Jan 02, 2022 9:38 pm
Apatosaurus wrote:Wayneactia wrote:I have never once said Garchyland is a puppet of a defender. I simply asked why their claims on the region take precedence over Vandy's when they have had about the same level of activity in the region over the last few years. Perhaps you should learn to read what was actually typed instead of those hidden magical sentences you seem to like to hallucinate.
If "about the same level of activity" means a total of almost twelve years as Delegate compared to a sleepy sleeper sitting in a region and doing nothing, then yes, definitely equal levels of activity.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Altmoras » Sun Jan 02, 2022 9:42 pm
by Vando0sa » Sun Jan 02, 2022 9:51 pm
Grea Kriopia wrote:Reventus Koth wrote:As the former delegate, and one of only two nations I expect are not a sleeper (read: not native) based on their WA status, I'd like to hear what they have to say. Until then, the author and their defender supporters have no more of a leg to stand on than the man with intense munchies himself.
Already covered pretty quickly and simply on discord, the proposal is pending native consent as stated for the nth time at the top of the draftWascoitan wrote:I mean, by that definition of a native then literally nobody in ALH is a "native" cause based off the activity on the RMB at least (maybe there's some offsite stuff with more to it but I doubt it) absolutely nobody has been contributing to the future of this region and engaging. considering the last message made before the raid was 101 days ago and it was the delegate questioning the future of the region because of the lack of activity. then before that there were a few embassy posts then a puppet of courelli posting SLU's statement on ainlands founder coup (which happened over a year ago now). where exactly are these natives that are supposedly supposed to be contributing to the future of the region and engaging? though all this going into the specifics of this particular region is ultimately unnecessary when all I need to do is point out that this definition of native would exclude non-WA issue answerers (possibly WA ones as well depending on how narrow you make the definition of "contribute to the future of the region") to show how you might not want to try to run with this definition, unless you want to say that the majority of nations in all/most regions aren't actually natives of course
You're blurring intent with action (aka activity) here for a convenient spin into a rabbithole about activity levels. Lenly didn't say only contribution or lack thereof defines who has a say in a region, it's also about intent to do harm to said region. If there's any question about Vandoosa's intent with the sleeper nation in the region, then well lol: https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=28901700
by Apatosaurus » Sun Jan 02, 2022 10:23 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Apatosaurus wrote:If "about the same level of activity" means a total of almost twelve years as Delegate compared to a sleepy sleeper sitting in a region and doing nothing, then yes, definitely equal levels of activity.
:clap: By all means my man, keep going. The stage is yours......
by WayNeacTia » Sun Jan 02, 2022 10:33 pm
Apatosaurus wrote:Wayneactia wrote:How exactly have they crashed the region? Spurring activity in a dead region is crashing it now? Who knew…..
Seizing the delegacy without native consent, banning long-time natives, defacing the WFE and flag with advertisements for your org, changing the password to something secret only the raiders know and closing all the embassies is spurring activity now? More like crashing a region for your own amusement. You also haven't considered that this "activity" will end as soon as raiders leave the region since they're all satisfied and feel good that they've destroyed the native community. And again, I'm surprised a former UDL member is supporting the region crashers here. I suppose people's alignments change when they're trying to evade bans.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Apatosaurus » Sun Jan 02, 2022 10:39 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Chester? Chester, the die hard, moralist defender? The one exactly like you?
Wayneactia wrote:The Chester that founded the North American Union, and had an embassy with A Liberal Haven?
Wayneactia wrote:but you sure seem to be the one making the biggest issue out of the region being raided here.
by Goobergunchia » Sun Jan 02, 2022 10:48 pm
Emodea wrote:Cognizant of the region’s continuous struggle for survival since its founder, Polaris and Vega, ceased to exist in 2011, making it a prime target for various invader forces over the course of the last decade,
by WayNeacTia » Sun Jan 02, 2022 10:48 pm
Apatosaurus wrote:Wayneactia wrote:The Chester that founded the North American Union, and had an embassy with A Liberal Haven?
Which you were in?
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Garchyland » Sun Jan 02, 2022 11:58 pm
Goobergunchia wrote:Emodea wrote:Cognizant of the region’s continuous struggle for survival since its founder, Polaris and Vega, ceased to exist in 2011, making it a prime target for various invader forces over the course of the last decade,
I'll be voting for this, but A Liberal Haven has been generally founderless for longer than 2011 -- the Founder coming back briefly in that year aside. This is a region I defended in my ADN days. See here.
by Vando0sa » Mon Jan 03, 2022 12:21 am
Garchyland wrote:
The founder came back for 30 days - it was an attempted revive, but the password is not recoverable. I have lived in ALH since its creation, under a few nations - my most recent (if 2007 is recent) is this one.
The truth is, we are not an active region. We do not try to relish in the glory of longevity, but most of my recent activity on this website has been limited. I am amazed to see what it has become in the almost 18 years I have been playing, when I created my first nation in a computer lab at my school. I have grown alongside this website, seeing the April Fools pranks introduced, the United Nations becoming the WA, and my 55 issues answered were the original handful of issues the website had :-) I would like to see activity brought back to ALH, but I have not had the time to do it on my own, and the native community is much like me - not very active, but very dedicated to supporting this website. Anyone who thinks that what is happening now is “spurring activity” should realize this is not what our region is about in any way. Perhaps we’ve been too welcoming in the past and ended up welcoming in our sleeper with open arms.
by Maineiacs » Mon Jan 03, 2022 1:42 am
by Tinhampton » Mon Jan 03, 2022 2:20 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement