Advertisement
by Pre-Christian Persecuted People » Fri Aug 06, 2021 12:42 am
by Arpasia » Fri Aug 06, 2021 12:45 am
East Asia and the Pacific Islands wrote:It's not very good, the points are too few for a condemnation and it's incredibly poorly written, and seems like a badge hunt. And I'm not even in the WAOberoni wrote:There is a rule that you can't commend/condemn site admins and mods.
No, mods like Jakker and luna amore have condemnations
Le temps de Philippeaux: OrbOb satellite captures S.S Jiangxiao moored on pirate-controlled Nasrah coast. | Black Coast government fully transitions into military dictatorship virtually overnight. | 5.7 magnitude earthquake rocks western Norteagua and Cortina. | Arpasian ambassador to Sufistan disappears after going inside People's Council building.Since those people have anime girls and whatnot on their flags, I decide to use him in my flag, and also, this is not Henry on my flag, it's Konrad and a marine.
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Fri Aug 06, 2021 12:46 am
Arpasia wrote:This Proposal Sucks!
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Cappedore » Fri Aug 06, 2021 2:58 am
President Austin Merrill | Vice President Cleveland Durand | Chancellor Maya Murray
by WayNeacTia » Fri Aug 06, 2021 5:22 am
Cappedore wrote:Wayneactia wrote:Where?
You come here and you start throwing around unwarranted insults towards the author in question. There's no use playing dumb with me.
At the end of the day, you were hardly criticising the guy. You were being unnecessarily antagonistic from the very beginning. I understand that some people are blunt when it comes to things like these, but a line is drawn between blunt criticism and just downright insults. I will gladly go back and pick out which messages have been completely antagonistic towards the author who is frankly just putting an effort towards an online game, the smut he received was NOT necessary, whether you agree or disagree with this proposal. There are standards and most members should know that by now.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Cappedore » Fri Aug 06, 2021 5:35 am
Wayneactia wrote:Cappedore wrote:You come here and you start throwing around unwarranted insults towards the author in question. There's no use playing dumb with me.
At the end of the day, you were hardly criticising the guy. You were being unnecessarily antagonistic from the very beginning. I understand that some people are blunt when it comes to things like these, but a line is drawn between blunt criticism and just downright insults. I will gladly go back and pick out which messages have been completely antagonistic towards the author who is frankly just putting an effort towards an online game, the smut he received was NOT necessary, whether you agree or disagree with this proposal. There are standards and most members should know that by now.
Be my guest. It isn't going to change anything, nor is it going to magically swing the vote so this passes.
President Austin Merrill | Vice President Cleveland Durand | Chancellor Maya Murray
by Sedgistan » Fri Aug 06, 2021 8:17 am
Sedgistan wrote:There's been too much nastiness from both sides at points in this debate. Dial it back or refrain from posting.
by The Free Humans » Fri Aug 06, 2021 8:23 am
by Team Lennox » Fri Aug 06, 2021 3:58 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Cappedore wrote:You come here and you start throwing around unwarranted insults towards the author in question. There's no use playing dumb with me.
At the end of the day, you were hardly criticising the guy. You were being unnecessarily antagonistic from the very beginning. I understand that some people are blunt when it comes to things like these, but a line is drawn between blunt criticism and just downright insults. I will gladly go back and pick out which messages have been completely antagonistic towards the author who is frankly just putting an effort towards an online game, the smut he received was NOT necessary, whether you agree or disagree with this proposal. There are standards and most members should know that by now.
Be my guest. It isn't going to change anything, nor is it going to magically swing the vote so this passes.
by Kingdom Of Englands » Fri Aug 06, 2021 4:49 pm
by Fachumonn » Sat Aug 07, 2021 8:53 am
Greater Cesnica wrote:I will vote 'For' this resolution on my WA just out of spite for the bullshit that TUMS has endured in this thread.
by Tinhampton » Sun Aug 08, 2021 9:03 pm
by Gorundu » Sun Aug 08, 2021 11:11 pm
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Aug 09, 2021 3:43 am
Gorundu wrote:I encourage some people in this thread to read and reflect on this proverb: "If you don't have something nice to say, don't say it at all."
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Cappedore » Mon Aug 09, 2021 4:48 am
President Austin Merrill | Vice President Cleveland Durand | Chancellor Maya Murray
by Sedgistan » Mon Aug 09, 2021 6:47 am
Cappedore wrote:My sincerest apologies to TUMS who faced a horrific amount of toxicity - even from the older nations - in this thread. This whole thing could’ve been done without all the unwarranted bullshit.
Gorundu wrote:I encourage some people in this thread to read and reflect on this proverb: "If you don't have something nice to say, don't say it at all."
by Wallenburg » Mon Aug 09, 2021 7:15 pm
Gorundu wrote:I encourage some people in this thread to read and reflect on this proverb: "If you don't have something nice to say, don't say it at all."
by The Unified Missourtama States » Mon Aug 09, 2021 7:58 pm
Wallenburg wrote:This was a really bad resolution and it seems that the votes came down with that opinion.
by Refuge Isle » Mon Aug 09, 2021 10:16 pm
by Bears Armed » Tue Aug 10, 2021 4:45 am
Refuge Isle wrote:The Unified Missourtama States wrote:Never was resolved as it failed at vote, it was and is a proposal.
This is not typically the interpretation. The voting page introduces these as "Resolution At Vote". A proposal is the stage of approval solicitation. When a proposal hits the voting floor, it is a resolution at that point.
This was a resolution that was failed.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement