[DEFEATED] Condemn Quebecshire

by **New Southwest Rhodesia** » Fri May 07, 2021 10:21 pm

"Opposed, simply for the poor writing. This is a serious body and should be focusing on serious matters. If the writer of such legislation wishes to be taken seriously, they should write it as such. If the legislation was written in a professional manner, our vote would have most likely been in support of such condemnation."

by **Drew Durrnil** » Fri May 07, 2021 10:35 pm

After seeing McM vote against this proposal, the vote is going to be a close one. Beepee is likely to vote against, same for Wischland, Chimes, and other delegates who have their votes democratically decided upon, and IA is unlikely to vote at all.
22:38 PST Edit: Wischland has voted against, as expected.

by **Warzone Codger** » Fri May 07, 2021 11:28 pm

Is it true that democracies have no humour?

Discuss.

by **Aelyria** » Sat May 08, 2021 12:22 am

The humor has, if anything, doubled from the previous occasion that this grandiloquent member submitted a proposal for our consideration.

Of course, the doubling of a negative quantity simply makes it that much more negative....

by **Refuge Isle** » Sat May 08, 2021 1:45 am

Warzone Codger wrote:Is it true that democracies have no humour?

Discuss.

It takes more than a garbage fire to make a resolution.

Ironically for how much people want to push "joke" proposals, the most amusing one I can think of in recent memory was also the most thoroughly stomped. As far as I can tell, the only joke to be had in the current vote is that Vara spend a dollar to waste four days of the Security Council's time again, for the second time this year. The actual content is uninspired and juvenile, so I suppose the answer to your question is "Check back when an adequate resolution can test it."

by **Honeydewistania** » Sat May 08, 2021 2:13 am

Warzone Codger wrote:Is it true that democracies have no humour?

Discuss.

The ones with no sense of humour are in fact the ones voting for this resolution

by **Vikanias** » Sat May 08, 2021 2:37 am

by **So Pep** » Sat May 08, 2021 4:33 am

Never have I actually seen a proposal go from for to against so quickly lol

by **Greater Cesnica** » Sat May 08, 2021 4:35 am

McCooley just shakes his head, sighing.

by **Unibot III** » Sat May 08, 2021 5:41 am

Quebec? AYE.

by **Island Girl Herby** » Sat May 08, 2021 5:59 am

Voted against because of the sloppy broken region tag. Yeah I’m petty like that.

by **Perikuresu** » Sat May 08, 2021 6:02 am

inb4 the Security Council is useless

by **Tinhampton** » Sat May 08, 2021 6:17 am

Island Girl Herby wrote:Voted against because of the sloppy broken region tag. Yeah I’m petty like that.

The borkedness was intentional on Vara/AMIPL's part

by **Varanius** » Sat May 08, 2021 10:01 am

Refuge Isle wrote:
Warzone Codger wrote:Is it true that democracies have no humour?

Discuss.

It takes more than a garbage fire to make a resolution.

Ironically for how much people want to push "joke" proposals, the most amusing one I can think of in recent memory was also the most thoroughly stomped. As far as I can tell, the only joke to be had in the current vote is that Vara spend a dollar to waste four days of the Security Council's time again, for the second time this year. The actual content is uninspired and juvenile, so I suppose the answer to your question is "Check back when an adequate resolution can test it."

It was more like 60 cents

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Sat May 08, 2021 10:05 am

Varanius wrote:
Refuge Isle wrote:It takes more than a garbage fire to make a resolution.

Ironically for how much people want to push "joke" proposals, the most amusing one I can think of in recent memory was also the most thoroughly stomped. As far as I can tell, the only joke to be had in the current vote is that Vara spend a dollar to waste four days of the Security Council's time again, for the second time this year. The actual content is uninspired and juvenile, so I suppose the answer to your question is "Check back when an adequate resolution can test it."

It was more like 60 cents

Right, that’s next week’s pocket money docked. Now go and apologize for writing an awful attempt at a joke or it will be no supper for you laddie,

by **Croanique** » Sat May 08, 2021 10:05 am

I do have to give this resolution credit for being a hilarious read.

by **Spudguy** » Sat May 08, 2021 12:42 pm

This Resolution is a massive waste of time. The formatting is broken, the contents are nonsense, and I have no clue who approved this.

by **United Socialist Territories** » Sat May 08, 2021 1:18 pm

Drew Durrnil wrote:Let me add that four out of five Pacifican delegates (Beepee from TSP, Zukchiva from TEP, East Durthang from TP, and Dilber from TWP), two out of four sinker delegates (North East Somerset from Balder and Valerievna from Osiris), and numerous influential delegates have approved this proposal so far. They must have latched on to the fact that this proposal is a joke.

Will you put me in your next video

by **Tinhampton** » Sat May 08, 2021 1:22 pm

United Socialist Territories wrote:
Drew Durrnil wrote:Let me add that four out of five Pacifican delegates (Beepee from TSP, Zukchiva from TEP, East Durthang from TP, and Dilber from TWP), two out of four sinker delegates (North East Somerset from Balder and Valerievna from Osiris), and numerous influential delegates have approved this proposal so far. They must have latched on to the fact that this proposal is a joke.

Will you put me in your next video

Not as far as I know - Drew Durnil's nation was "Deruuu" (now CTEd), not "Drew Durrnil."

by **United Socialist Territories** » Sat May 08, 2021 1:22 pm

Tinhampton wrote:
United Socialist Territories wrote:Will you put me in your next video

Not as far as I know - Drew Durnil's nation was "Deruuu" (now CTEd), not "Drew Durrnil."

it was a joke

by **United Socialist Territories** » Sat May 08, 2021 1:24 pm

Spudguy wrote:This Resolution is a massive waste of time. The formatting is broken, the contents are nonsense, and I have no clue who approved this.

I think its a joke

by **Great Algerstonia** » Sat May 08, 2021 7:10 pm

Tinhampton wrote:Varanius sent out the following campaign telegram to tag:delegates at 18:35:33 BST on Thursday:
Greetings, Delegate %NATION%,

I am writing to you to request that you approve my proposal, Condemn Quebecshire. Quebecshire is a nation which has repeatedly deceived and tricked various nations and regions throughout the world, including his own region. Not only are they the acting founder of [region]the League of Conservative Nations[/regions] (a region they rule without a hint of democratic elections), but they also use this region to trick nations with a more conservative bent into joining the region, only to be dogpiled for their politics by the founder.

Quebecshire has also gone out of their way to attack many valued international figures for reasons they refuse to specify, exemplifying cruelty without reason. These acts should not go without punishment. This Condemnation would not only serve as a warning to those Quebecshire would normally be happy to trick and fool, but also serve as a warning of his general malevolence. Protecting the newer nations Quebecshire continues to take advantage of should be a priority of the World Assembly and is exactly why you should approve this proposal.

https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1620257828

Sincerely,
Varanius
The "region" tag is deliberately broken.

Capitalism moment

If we had communism this wouldnt have happened

by **Nosam Republic** » Sat May 08, 2021 7:47 pm

Can someone tell me why these joke condemnations keep going up for vote?

by **En Hassik** » Sat May 08, 2021 7:52 pm

Nosam Republic wrote:Can someone tell me why these joke condemnations keep going up for vote?

Because some do not even read the resolution and just auto vote for. This is why we get useless and terrible resolutions passed ugh

by **Kunimu** » Sat May 08, 2021 11:19 pm

Highly professional and serious proposal.

This has my immediate support.

[DEFEATED] Condemn Quebecshire

Who is online