Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2021 5:30 am
Godular wrote:British Starsian Influence wrote:
I'm not saying that we should totally outlaw abortion in all member states, but I am saying that the levels of partisanship in this bill are alarming. For example, in one clause, it references that all qualified physicians be required to perform abortions over religious or moral objections. This is appalling! Love it or hate it, abortion should not and should never be forced upon the individual. For many conservative doctors, performing an abortion is tantamount to infanticide, and no one should be forced to perform murder against their will! Now, the old legislation does have faults, but it is a compromise, and the best we'll be able to get. There is no reason why it should be repealed or expanded upon.
It was already expanded upon several times over, and 'conservative doctors' still would not be forced into providing an abortion as the other resolutions provided methods to access abortion services under most any circumstances. I'm not really seeing what your problem is.
Nor would this resolution affect you, O non-member.
My problem with your point is that "most any" circumstance is not secure enough. If the physician in question truly believes that abortion is wrong, they cannot under any circumstances perform one, even if their job is on the line. And also, look at the last clause. "Confident that the political will of member nations and resolutions GAR #29 "Patient's Rights Act", GAR #286 "Reproductive Freedoms", GAR #499 "Access to Abortion", and GAR #523 "Patient Travel Freedoms" provide for the guarantee of reproductive freedom to all individuals under the jurisdiction of member states," If that was the case, why would we need new legislation? This bill is an attempt to overturn a better thought out and frankly better written alternative.
(By the way, I'm in the WA, just not with my main nation. I'm a defender on a mission right now).