NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Repeal "Commend the Western Isles"

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Comfed
Minister
 
Posts: 2258
Founded: Apr 09, 2020
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Comfed » Thu Jan 07, 2021 7:50 am

Aruia wrote:
Shanzie wrote:I'm truthfully confused as to the energy behind the repeal. Twi didn't ask for the commendation nor did we fight the repeal. Most of us voted for it lol.

it will help some nations who play the WA game sleep better at night :roll:

“The WA game” is just as valid as your RP. It is condescending statements like this one that are making many people oppose your commendation in the first place.

User avatar
Nova Vandalia
Envoy
 
Posts: 323
Founded: Jan 19, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Nova Vandalia » Thu Jan 07, 2021 8:14 am

Comfed wrote:
Aruia wrote:it will help some nations who play the WA game sleep better at night :roll:

“The WA game” is just as valid as your RP. It is condescending statements like this one that are making many people oppose your commendation in the first place.


While I agree with your statement that "The WA game" is just a valid as their RP game, I do want to point out it wasn't their RP game that interjected itself into the WA aspect of NS, but vice versa. One that carelessly injected them into the limelight, rewarded them, returned them to the limelight, opened them and the author up to criticism, and then ripped the award away and is upset that they're defensive towards us. This isn't something as they pointed they asked for but something we collectively did to them. I mean their aree in my opinion is some valid reasoning in why we needed to repeal it, but we should of see regardless of the valid reasoning, that TWI's feelings towards us is equally valid considering that circumstances.

Again I always find it a little odd, that the organization who's sole purpose is to judge the other communities of NS and decide who is worthy of merit or not, is very rarely open to judgements of our own merit from those communities.

I think Aruia's comment has a ring of truth to it, even if I don't agree with the tone. We did it to make our community feel better, without regard for how their community should or would feel. I mean the argument many will offer against this is to blame the original author, but that is saying our community shares no responsibility for the passage and failure of any proposal, which I feel would undercut the purpose of this forum and community.

I've been in there shoes, and sympathize heavily with them, simply saying it isn't personal isn't always enough to bandage the wounds we make. That being said I also understand that my stance isn't common in the SC, so it won't account for much.

Either way this has passed so my condolences to TWI, and my congrats to Bormiar.
If my tone is coming off as a little harsh, please call me out on it, I rarely mean to come off that way.

Be Ruthless to Systems, Be Kind to People.

User avatar
Pluvie
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 151
Founded: Apr 14, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Pluvie » Thu Jan 07, 2021 8:54 am

Nova Vandalia wrote:
Comfed wrote:“The WA game” is just as valid as your RP. It is condescending statements like this one that are making many people oppose your commendation in the first place.


While I agree with your statement that "The WA game" is just a valid as their RP game, I do want to point out it wasn't their RP game that interjected itself into the WA aspect of NS, but vice versa. One that carelessly injected them into the limelight, rewarded them, returned them to the limelight, opened them and the author up to criticism, and then ripped the award away and is upset that they're defensive towards us. This isn't something as they pointed they asked for but something we collectively did to them. I mean their aree in my opinion is some valid reasoning in why we needed to repeal it, but we should of see regardless of the valid reasoning, that TWI's feelings towards us is equally valid considering that circumstances.

Again I always find it a little odd, that the organization who's sole purpose is to judge the other communities of NS and decide who is worthy of merit or not, is very rarely open to judgements of our own merit from those communities.

I think Aruia's comment has a ring of truth to it, even if I don't agree with the tone. We did it to make our community feel better, without regard for how their community should or would feel. I mean the argument many will offer against this is to blame the original author, but that is saying our community shares no responsibility for the passage and failure of any proposal, which I feel would undercut the purpose of this forum and community.

I've been in there shoes, and sympathize heavily with them, simply saying it isn't personal isn't always enough to bandage the wounds we make. That being said I also understand that my stance isn't common in the SC, so it won't account for much.

Either way this has passed so my condolences to TWI, and my congrats to Bormiar.

I'm just gonna interject here to say that first of all, I was still against this resolution. I helped make a lotta edits to tone down the language and I was still against in the end. However, I don't think a repeal was a bad idea. In fact I think a repeal needed to happen. There were enough people not happy with the passing of the resolution that a repeal was going to be in order at some point. Whether I think that repeal should've been instant? Maybe not. Should the repeal have been as personal as it was? Definitely not. But repeals, generally speaking, aren't meant to like strip an award from a player or a region, people in the SC don't just have a constant evil voice telling them to strip people of their resolutions. Imo, the reason this one was repealed was simply that most everyone didn't feel that it was truly a WA resolution that was good enough to stay around.

I'll also note that from all of Borms comments, this wasn't in any way a repeal meant to say that TWI didn't deserve a commend, in fact he quite notably wrote that if anyone wanted to draft a replace, that they were welcome to do so. This resolution came down more to quality of writing than anything involving the region itself. Perhaps it was careless to pass the original commend TWI, I don't disagree with that, but there's nothing wrong with repealing a resolution that is poorly written
You're Beautiful!! Have a great day
Writer, editor, and generally curious cat
Let me know if you ever need help with writing or editing and I’m always willing to lend a helpful hand!
Feel free to telegram or dm me on discord!
Have a heckin day ^-^

User avatar
Bhang Bhang Duc
Senator
 
Posts: 4721
Founded: Dec 17, 2003
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bhang Bhang Duc » Thu Jan 07, 2021 9:50 am

Reading the most recent comments I start to wonder if any of you actually bothered to peruse the proposal.

It focuses solely on the appallingly bad job the author made of the commendation. For a nation or a region to be commended it should stand out from the crowd. It is the author’s task to show the WA in general that the nominee is worthy of the award. In this case the author of the commendation failed miserably to do this and the repeal was a step by step refutation of the points in the commendation.
Former Delegate of The West Pacific. Guardian (under many Delegates) of The West Pacific. TWP's Former Minister for World Assembly Affairs and former Security Council Advisor.

The West Pacific's Official Welshman, Astronomer and Old Fart
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.

RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.

Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..

User avatar
Nova Vandalia
Envoy
 
Posts: 323
Founded: Jan 19, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Nova Vandalia » Thu Jan 07, 2021 9:51 am

Pluvie wrote:
Nova Vandalia wrote:
While I agree with your statement that "The WA game" is just a valid as their RP game, I do want to point out it wasn't their RP game that interjected itself into the WA aspect of NS, but vice versa. One that carelessly injected them into the limelight, rewarded them, returned them to the limelight, opened them and the author up to criticism, and then ripped the award away and is upset that they're defensive towards us. This isn't something as they pointed they asked for but something we collectively did to them. I mean their aree in my opinion is some valid reasoning in why we needed to repeal it, but we should of see regardless of the valid reasoning, that TWI's feelings towards us is equally valid considering that circumstances.

Again I always find it a little odd, that the organization who's sole purpose is to judge the other communities of NS and decide who is worthy of merit or not, is very rarely open to judgements of our own merit from those communities.

I think Aruia's comment has a ring of truth to it, even if I don't agree with the tone. We did it to make our community feel better, without regard for how their community should or would feel. I mean the argument many will offer against this is to blame the original author, but that is saying our community shares no responsibility for the passage and failure of any proposal, which I feel would undercut the purpose of this forum and community.

I've been in there shoes, and sympathize heavily with them, simply saying it isn't personal isn't always enough to bandage the wounds we make. That being said I also understand that my stance isn't common in the SC, so it won't account for much.

Either way this has passed so my condolences to TWI, and my congrats to Bormiar.


I'm just gonna interject here to say that first of all, I was still against this resolution. I helped make a lotta edits to tone down the language and I was still against in the end. However, I don't think a repeal was a bad idea. In fact I think a repeal needed to happen. There were enough people not happy with the passing of the resolution that a repeal was going to be in order at some point. Whether I think that repeal should've been instant? Maybe not. Should the repeal have been as personal as it was? Definitely not. But repeals, generally speaking, aren't meant to like strip an award from a player or a region, people in the SC don't just have a constant evil voice telling them to strip people of their resolutions. Imo, the reason this one was repealed was simply that most everyone didn't feel that it was truly a WA resolution that was good enough to stay around.

I'll also note that from all of Borms comments, this wasn't in any way a repeal meant to say that TWI didn't deserve a commend, in fact he quite notably wrote that if anyone wanted to draft a replace, that they were welcome to do so. This resolution came down more to quality of writing than anything involving the region itself. Perhaps it was careless to pass the original commend TWI, I don't disagree with that, but there's nothing wrong with repealing a resolution that is poorly written


You are completely mischaracterizing my statements, it maybe that lack of emotional context or wording on my part, but I at no point called us out for having an "Evil voice" as you put it. Those are your words and I would appreciate if you didn't put them in my mouth. At worst I called us careless, in handling TWI's commend, repeal and attitude towards the SC, which I stand by. We act like the Commends don't matter to a community, and yet we guard their "worth"? Which is it? If it has worth then chastising a region for being upset with us when we give and then repeal, whether deserved or otherwise is a little careless, or is our constant defending of them unnecessary in which case is it is equally careless. I'm not saying it's intentional, but it is something we need to look at.

All I ask if for a little understanding of the plight of,and how we approach it for, regions and individuals who we do this too. We act with a self given impunity toward our effects in those community, and an impunity which I am simply asking may need examination.

I'm not saying repeals are bad, I'm not saying this repeal is bad. As a matter of fact I don't think aside from ones that effect my friends and region I have ever voted against a repeal. I'm saying that us calling TWI's feeling's invalid and unwarranted is unjust, because they didn't bloody ask for any of this, We did and even if it wasn't out intent to cause those feelings, we have. We can be a little nicer as a group and if asking for a more respectful approach to the regions we inject ourselves into is "bad", if asking us to examine how we treated TWI and their community is wrong. What does that say?
Last edited by Nova Vandalia on Thu Jan 07, 2021 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
If my tone is coming off as a little harsh, please call me out on it, I rarely mean to come off that way.

Be Ruthless to Systems, Be Kind to People.

User avatar
Pluvie
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 151
Founded: Apr 14, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Pluvie » Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:08 am

Nova Vandalia wrote:
Pluvie wrote:
I'm just gonna interject here to say that first of all, I was still against this resolution. I helped make a lotta edits to tone down the language and I was still against in the end. However, I don't think a repeal was a bad idea. In fact I think a repeal needed to happen. There were enough people not happy with the passing of the resolution that a repeal was going to be in order at some point. Whether I think that repeal should've been instant? Maybe not. Should the repeal have been as personal as it was? Definitely not. But repeals, generally speaking, aren't meant to like strip an award from a player or a region, people in the SC don't just have a constant evil voice telling them to strip people of their resolutions. Imo, the reason this one was repealed was simply that most everyone didn't feel that it was truly a WA resolution that was good enough to stay around.

I'll also note that from all of Borms comments, this wasn't in any way a repeal meant to say that TWI didn't deserve a commend, in fact he quite notably wrote that if anyone wanted to draft a replace, that they were welcome to do so. This resolution came down more to quality of writing than anything involving the region itself. Perhaps it was careless to pass the original commend TWI, I don't disagree with that, but there's nothing wrong with repealing a resolution that is poorly written


You are completely mischaracterizing my statements, it maybe that lack of emotional context or wording on my part, but I at no point called us out for having an "Evil voice" as you put it. Those are your words and I would appreciate if you didn't put them in my mouth. At worst I called us careless, in handling TWI's commend, repeal and attitude towards the SC, which I stand by. We act like the Commends don't matter to a community, and yet we guard their "worth"? Which is it? If it has worth then chastising a region for being upset with us when we give and then repeal, whether deserved or otherwise is a little careless, or is our constant defending of them unnecessary in which case is it is equally careless. I'm not saying it's intentional, but it is something we need to look at.

All I ask if for a little understanding of the plight of,and how we approach it for, regions and individuals who we do this too. We act with a self given impunity toward our effects in those community, and an impunity which I am simply asking may need examination.

I'm not saying repeals are bad, I'm not saying this repeal is bad. As a matter of fact I don't think aside from ones that effect my friends and region I have ever voted against a repeal. I'm saying that us calling TWI's feeling's invalid and unwarranted is unjust, because they didn't bloody ask for any of this, We did and even if it wasn't out intent to cause those feelings, we have. We can be a little nicer as a group and if asking for a more respectful approach to the regions we inject ourselves into is "bad", if asking us to examine how we treated TWI and their community is wrong. What does that say?

Ah, my apologies ^-^ I misread some of your comments there. I'll usher myself out ;)
You're Beautiful!! Have a great day
Writer, editor, and generally curious cat
Let me know if you ever need help with writing or editing and I’m always willing to lend a helpful hand!
Feel free to telegram or dm me on discord!
Have a heckin day ^-^

User avatar
Havalland
Envoy
 
Posts: 273
Founded: May 27, 2019
Father Knows Best State

Postby Havalland » Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:47 am

Alright boys time for me to write the condemnation of the TWI proposal!
DEAM VULT HERETICS!

User avatar
Corindia
Minister
 
Posts: 2669
Founded: May 29, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Corindia » Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:52 am

Havalland wrote:Alright boys time for me to write the condemnation of the TWI proposal!

I'll get the repeal of that ready, if we're quick we can have both passed within the month

Of the People, For the People

User avatar
Aruia
Envoy
 
Posts: 265
Founded: Apr 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aruia » Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:32 am

Nova Vandalia wrote:
Comfed wrote:“The WA game” is just as valid as your RP. It is condescending statements like this one that are making many people oppose your commendation in the first place.

While I agree with your statement that "The WA game" is just a valid as their RP game, I do want to point out it wasn't their RP game that interjected itself into the WA aspect of NS, but vice versa. One that carelessly injected them into the limelight, rewarded them, returned them to the limelight, opened them and the author up to criticism, and then ripped the award away and is upset that they're defensive towards us. This isn't something as they pointed they asked for but something we collectively did to them. I mean their aree in my opinion is some valid reasoning in why we needed to repeal it, but we should of see regardless of the valid reasoning, that TWI's feelings towards us is equally valid considering that circumstances.

Again I always find it a little odd, that the organization who's sole purpose is to judge the other communities of NS and decide who is worthy of merit or not, is very rarely open to judgements of our own merit from those communities.

I think Aruia's comment has a ring of truth to it, even if I don't agree with the tone. We did it to make our community feel better, without regard for how their community should or would feel. I mean the argument many will offer against this is to blame the original author, but that is saying our community shares no responsibility for the passage and failure of any proposal, which I feel would undercut the purpose of this forum and community.

I've been in there shoes, and sympathize heavily with them, simply saying it isn't personal isn't always enough to bandage the wounds we make. That being said I also understand that my stance isn't common in the SC, so it won't account for much.

Either way this has passed so my condolences to TWI, and my congrats to Bormiar.


i should clear that i never denied its validity and i made several posts ago reasoning for voting in favor.
one of them was that it takes away from the motivation of those who play the WA game.
But many as Vandalia point outs act on a one-sided principal. But that is their choice.
Visit Aruias factbook meet the nation of the hoopoes

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads