Advertisement
by Feyrisshire » Mon Mar 22, 2021 3:06 am
Froggy News | "People's Struggle Against Fake News and Disinformation" Campaign reach extreme heights: High Princess Ryeisse Schyi Yuri orders Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Tiktok users to be sent to labor camp and issues a bounty for the head of Elon Musk (Archive) | Update on pet food ban in Feyrisshire | Ban of "Bocchi the Rock" triggers debate on "socialist art" | Toilet paper banned in Feyrisshire
by Texkentuck » Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:17 pm
by Tsaivao » Wed Mar 24, 2021 9:02 am
Feyrisshire wrote:I see no reason and no need for a replacement resolution, the repeal is as good as is. All nations have an interest in guarding against the threat of cyberattacks and virtually all functioning governments already do so, and so the issue is not within the concern of the WA and does not need to be covered by WA legislation.
OPERATION TEN-GO: Tsaivao Authority confirms wormhole drives based on alien designs are functional | Gen. Tsaosin: "Operational integrity is the key to our success against the xenic threat. In a week, we will have already infiltrated into their world." | All leaders of Tsaivao send personal farewells to Ten-Go special forces unit Tsaikantan-8
by Bananaistan » Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:00 pm
by Luna Amore » Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:07 pm
Bananaistan wrote:OOC: Per the public challenge thread, GenSec has deemed this proposal illegal. It will be discarded at the end of voting.
by Feyrisshire » Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:10 pm
Tsaivao wrote:Due to the very nature of the Internet (or interdimensional equivalent) allowing for increased interaction with foreign entities, a WA resolution should be necessary to at the very least enforce the illegality of cyberattacks, in addition to making security a responsibility of all member states.
Tsaivao wrote:Imagine if you were a resident of country A, who purchases a product online from country B, but that data is mishandled in country B due to negligence, and your personal information is exposed to criminals back in country A. One would be entirely helpless because of a lack of rigid regulation or bearing of responsibility should country B lack the same legislation of country A.
Tsaivao wrote:...since the vast majority of cyberattacks are caused by inexperience or negigence opening the door for quick and easy exploitation (I can provide sources if needed, but OOC Im on mobile and this post is already long).
Tsaivao wrote:And, as you may know, many state governments have just as much incentive to deregulate or obfuscate policy or responsibilty on cyberattacks, either because they do not have the resources to pursue investigations of cyberattacks, or because they refuse to hold the actors responsible for one reason or another.
Tsaivao wrote:"State-sponsored hacking is also something that I believe future legislation could curb."
Froggy News | "People's Struggle Against Fake News and Disinformation" Campaign reach extreme heights: High Princess Ryeisse Schyi Yuri orders Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Tiktok users to be sent to labor camp and issues a bounty for the head of Elon Musk (Archive) | Update on pet food ban in Feyrisshire | Ban of "Bocchi the Rock" triggers debate on "socialist art" | Toilet paper banned in Feyrisshire
by Honeydewistania » Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:26 pm
Bananaistan wrote:OOC: Per the public challenge thread, GenSec has deemed this proposal illegal. It will be discarded at the end of voting.
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Tinhampton » Wed Mar 24, 2021 9:00 pm
by New Visayan Islands » Wed Mar 24, 2021 9:08 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement