[PASSED] Commend Sierra Lyricalia

by **Honeydewistania** » Tue Nov 03, 2020 8:28 am

Comfed wrote:Excellent as always, Cretox! I’ll try to have more feedback when I have time.

What about moi >:(

by **Cretox State** » Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:05 am

Honeydewistania wrote:
Comfed wrote:Excellent as always, Cretox! I’ll try to have more feedback when I have time.

What about moi

Hey, don't sell Honeydewistania short! They're the main reason this draft is where it is!

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:30 am

You might want to check the legality of adding “Repeal: Promotion of Recycling” - it’s work done as a member of the Secretariat and therefore could be illegal under R1.

by **Cretox State** » Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:53 am

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:You might want to check the legality of adding “Repeal: Promotion of Recycling” - it’s work done as a member of the Secretariat and therefore could be illegal under R1.

While I don't have the exact ruling on hand, I believe that R1 only applies to actions taken as a site volunteer within the scope of their official responsibilities. Passing or coauthoring resolutions is not within the scope of the Secretariat's official responsibilities as a site volunteer, and unlike issue editors, members of the Secretariat don't have access to anything that gives them an inherent unfair advantage above regular players when it comes to writing and passing resolutions. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:18 am

Cretox State wrote:
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:You might want to check the legality of adding “Repeal: Promotion of Recycling” - it’s work done as a member of the Secretariat and therefore could be illegal under R1.

While I don't have the exact ruling on hand, I believe that R1 only applies to actions taken as a site volunteer within the scope of their official responsibilities. Passing or coauthoring resolutions is not within the scope of the Secretariat's official responsibilities as a site volunteer, and unlike issue editors, members of the Secretariat don't have access to anything that gives them an inherent unfair advantage above regular players when it comes to writing and passing resolutions. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

No, you’re not incorrect, I am. Found the relevant ruling, last paragraph of the linked post.

viewtopic.php?p=32300959#p32300959

As you were.

by **Comfed** » Tue Nov 03, 2020 3:36 pm

Cretox State wrote:
Honeydewistania wrote:What about moi

Hey, don't sell Honeydewistania short! They're the main reason this draft is where it is!

Oh, yes, and Honeydewistana.

by **Cretox State** » Thu Nov 05, 2020 10:11 am

Given the fairly straightforward and uncontroversial nature of this proposal, I’ll likely be submitting soon if there are no outstanding issues.

by **Ransium** » Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:25 am

I see no way to view the references to LL and dossiers as anything but a rule 1 violation. It’s clear you are trying to reference them editing issues since LL did not write any issues.

by **Cretox State** » Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:19 am

Ransium wrote:I see no way to view the references to LL and dossiers as anything but a rule 1 violation. It’s clear you are trying to reference them editing issues since LL did not write any issues.

That was not my intention as all. “Dossiers” refers to issues. This section:

a plethora of other dossiers which Sierra Lyricalia has directly assisted in the writing of both through their own name and under the name of the tandem state of Logophilia Lyricalia

Is a reference to GI activity. It’s the only mention of LL in the proposal.

If it’s definitely a violation, I’ll just pull and resubmit.

by **Wrapper** » Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:01 pm

Mods have declared this illegal, R1. My best guess is it's for this reason:

Ransium wrote:I see no way to view the references to LL and dossiers as anything but a rule 1 violation. It’s clear you are trying to reference them editing issues since LL did not write any issues.

Take out paragraph 4 of the "Recognizing" clause, and it **should** be legal IMO.

by **Cretox State** » Sun Nov 08, 2020 10:23 am

I've removed what I assume to be the offending clause and resubmitted.

by **Tinfect** » Tue Nov 10, 2020 10:43 pm

I don't vote on SC proposals on principle, but SL is wholly worthy of a commendation and I fully endorse this effort; felt I had to make that known.

by **Island Girl Herby** » Wed Nov 11, 2020 5:14 am

Woo hoo, finally a commendation I can get behind! Voting for. And mailing a few thousand ballots too ehhhhhhh what, did I just strike a nerve there?

by **Ransium** » Wed Nov 11, 2020 6:03 am

Full support, SL was long overdue for a commend.

by **Comfed** » Wed Nov 11, 2020 7:22 am

Ransium wrote:Full support, SL was long overdue for a commend.

Pretty much this. Full support.

by **Lord Dominator** » Sat Nov 14, 2020 10:14 pm

Commend Sierra Lyricalia was passed 12,532 votes to 1,451.

by **Cretox State** » Sat Nov 14, 2020 10:33 pm

Lord Dominator wrote:
Commend Sierra Lyricalia was passed 12,532 votes to 1,451.

Ooh-rah.

by **Honeydewistania** » Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:59 pm

Cretox State wrote:
Lord Dominator wrote:
Commend Sierra Lyricalia was passed 12,532 votes to 1,451.

Ooh-rah.

Another one to add to the ego wall

[PASSED] Commend Sierra Lyricalia

Who is online