Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2020 9:09 am
Free Republic of Hong Kong wrote:This is a bad resolution arguably same/worse as CCD self-commend attemps
how are those bad when they're literally jokes.
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Free Republic of Hong Kong wrote:This is a bad resolution arguably same/worse as CCD self-commend attemps
Free Republic of Hong Kong wrote:This is a bad resolution arguably same/worse as CCD self-commend attemps
Outer Sparta wrote:Free Republic of Hong Kong wrote:This is a bad resolution arguably same/worse as CCD self-commend attemps
Except this one, the campaigners are actually serious about it to the point of spending real money to get a campaign going for people to approve it and then subsequently getting crushed in voting.
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Mathuvan Union wrote:how are those bad when they're literally jokes.
I really don’t think you’re in any position to cast aspersions on other nations’ proposals considering the extremely ropey quality of ones drafted by yourself (well your ex-nation) and others written by your region mates.
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Finally managed to get a legal proposal after four attempts. You’d think with all those rewrites the author would have come up with something half decent. Unfortunately not. Mind you the attempt by Nopengie to condemn Lasagna was also pretty shocking in terms of quality.
Let’s face it this is just a petty dispute between two very minor regions and not worth wasting the SC’s time with.
Take your childish arguments elsewhere.
Valentine Z wrote:The Security Council resolution "Condemn ravana" was defeated 15,455 votes to 1,644.
An approximate 9.40:1 ratio.