Adriatican wrote:Kenmoria wrote:“This is not the case. Because the proposal does not allow or permit bloodsports to any extent in member nations, there would be no issue if a member state were to completely ban bloodsports in their entirety, or impose any restrictions up to this point. The lack of any clause in the text that would prohibit such restrictions implicitly allows them.”
"We thank the Honorable Delegate for their clarification. Additionally, we would express concern behind the seemingly narrow definition of "sentient" beings covered underneath the protections of this Resolution.
Adriatican is a nation of supremely advanced technology, and legally recognizes the personhood of artificial intelligences.
Though we may effectively amend this legislation to assure its protections apply to such intelligences within our jurisdictions, we would like to respectfully express our concerns that the Resolution cannot, in our opinion, be reasonably interpreted to provide its protections to Adriaris classified as A.I's, should they leave a jurisdiction where our broadening of the Resolution is not legally enforceable.
As such, we query how this may be remedied, if at all, through either additional W.A legislation, or some other means."
“I believe it is GA #354, AI Coexistence Protocol, that would help in this scenario. This resolution prohibits discrimination on the basis of a person being an artificial intelligence.”