NationStates

This is now up to vote!

Condemn Great Nepal

The Security Council,

RECOGNIZING Great Nepal as an oppressive dictatorship.

NOTING that Great Nepal grants little to no political rights to its population, along with subjecting citizens to cruel punishment.

INSULTED by the fact the the United Kingdom of Great Nepal made a mockery of the World Assembly and its resolutions by actively and fully participating in the slave trade while it was still a member of the World Assembly.

HORRIFIED that Great Nepal has committed, and admitted to abusing the population in ways such as:
a. Executing children in schools of all grade levels for being suspected of "bullying."
b. Killing all children before the age of four suspected to be homosexual, even though it would be near impossible to know at that young age, and only allowing children to live if they pay currency to the government.
c. Using child slaves for labor purposes.

FURTHER REALIZING that Great Nepal has shown itself to be a threat to other nations through actions such as:
a. Actively searching for cheap nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
b. Threatening to use and has actively used these cheap nuclear weapons on both WA and non-WA nations alike.
c. Creating and purchasing viruses and biological weapons.
d. Using newly founded nations as testing sites for nuclear weapons.

HEREBY Condemns Great Nepal




So how is it? I did my research by going through Great Nepal's posts. Would anyone here support it?

Oh, and if anyone has anything to add, please say so!

Anyone... critique or anything?

Maybe at least a poll vote?

Righto, let's have a go.

Condemn Great Nepal

The Security Council,

RECOGNIZING the United Kingdom of Great Nepal as a fascist dictatorship.

NOTING that Great Nepal grants little to no political rights to its population of citizens.

INSULTED at the fact the the United Kingdom of Great Nepal made a mockery of the World Assembly and its resolutions by actively and fully participating in slave trade while still a member of the World Assembly.

UNNERVED that Great Nepal has actively donated to Nazi and Fascist organizations, including political parties solely operating in other nations.

HORRIFIED that Great Nepal has committed, and admitted to abusing the population in ways proven such as:
a. Executing children in schools of all grade levels for being suspected of "bullying."
b. Killing all children before the age of four suspected to be homosexual, even though it would be near impossible to know at that young age, and only allowing children to live if they pay currency to the government.

FURTHER REALIZING that Great Nepal has shown itself to be a threat to the world by actions such as:
a. Actively searching for cheap nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
b. Gloating about having nuclear weapons to World Assembly members.
c. Creating or purchasing viruses and biological weapons.

HEREBY Condemns Great Nepal

There are no glaring errors. Not too sure on the Nazi and Fascist clauses, they might have popular appeal, but such ideologies aren't always bad. That's not too big though.

Could change the first fascist to oppressive, but that's very minor.

On the FURTHER REALIZING clause, has Greater Nepal ever used such weapons in conflict?

From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?

Otherwise, a pretty damn fine basis.

From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?

Precisely. Great Nepal is no worse than so many other nations and i doubt that this can go through.

Oh my!!!!!

I have seen this post, and have hereby decided to cancel fights with Great Nepal International Airport. After seeing this thread though, I will have to check Great Nepal's posts first for prove. Full detail will come later.

This quote is from this site.

Great Nepal wrote:We want 8000 slaves to work in our wepons factorys, we dont care about there race, sex etc. But we want them to be a child, and slim. More details are in the following form.

Name of State: Great Nepal
Head of Slave or Trade department (if applicable): N/A
Sex slaves (Y or N): No
Age group of slaves: Child
Characteristics: We dont care about this (just send which is cheapest)
Body condition: Slim
Special requests: Please send slaves who are able to work long and hard.

This quote is from this site.

Great Nepal wrote:To: Orlkjestad
From: Great Nepal

We are shocked to hear your message. You say you believe in freedom but oppose people who believes in slave trade? You may not like slave trade, we have nothing to say in it but we believe in slave trade so we have our right to practice it. And there is also a question of Free market. Every nation have its own views so we urge not to interference in the personal matter of a nation, it is considered immoral. And about declaring a war, we dont think this is a good reason to declare a war.

-Dictator Of Great Nepal.

So far, I have only found evidence for slavery. But as a nation, my people find it shocking that another country can blatantly get slaves. And the slaves in the slave market are children who won't have an education thanks to this event.
Technically, I half agree with Great Nepal in the other post. But the other half is that slave nations sometimes just take them away. Those are real slaves. They are forced directly.

More eveidence will come soon.

South Norwega wrote:There are no glaring errors. Not too sure on the Nazi and Fascist clauses, they might have popular appeal, but such ideologies aren't always bad. That's not too big though.

Could change the first fascist to oppressive, but that's very minor.

On the FURTHER REALIZING clause, has Greater Nepal ever used such weapons in conflict?

From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?

Otherwise, a pretty damn fine basis.

Vargas listened and nodded in agreement with the ambassadors statements. He did, however, want to make a statement of his own regarding one of the proposed clauses. He coughed to clear his throat and stood up, adjusting the microphone as he did.

"Hindopia wishes express our approval of this condemnation. Any nation that routinely executes children on the basis that they may be homosexual deserves not only be condemned but be expelled from this organisation. However, we cannot expel a nation on that basis so we must condemn only. We are not entirely happy with the "FURTHER REALIZING" clause as it seems to be a weak statement. There is no reason to condemn Great Nepal on the basis of it "searching for cheap nuclear weapons" or "gloating about having nuclear weapons". Also, the clause declaring the WA to be "UNNERVED" about the nation donating to Nazi and fascist organisations worries us. Hindopia is very proud of our extensive civil and political freedoms and a pillar of those is free speech. The Hindopian Government considers political donations an integral part of free speech. We would not like to see a resolution that condemns such actions. If the honored delegation for Denecaep would consider addressing these issues it would be very much appreciated.

----
Ambassador Harrowsing, for Hindopia

Harrowsing resumed his chair and tried to look busy shuffling papers and what-not.

South Norwega wrote:

Righto, let's have a go.

Condemn Great Nepal

The Security Council,

RECOGNIZING the United Kingdom of Great Nepal as a fascist dictatorship.

NOTING that Great Nepal grants little to no political rights to its population of citizens.

INSULTED at the fact the the United Kingdom of Great Nepal made a mockery of the World Assembly and its resolutions by actively and fully participating in slave trade while still a member of the World Assembly.

UNNERVED that Great Nepal has actively donated to Nazi and Fascist organizations, including political parties solely operating in other nations.

HORRIFIED that Great Nepal has committed, and admitted to abusing the population in ways proven such as:
a. Executing children in schools of all grade levels for being suspected of "bullying."
b. Killing all children before the age of four suspected to be homosexual, even though it would be near impossible to know at that young age, and only allowing children to live if they pay currency to the government.

FURTHER REALIZING that Great Nepal has shown itself to be a threat to the world by actions such as:
a. Actively searching for cheap nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
b. Gloating about having nuclear weapons to World Assembly members.
c. Creating or purchasing viruses and biological weapons.

HEREBY Condemns Great Nepal

There are no glaring errors. Not too sure on the Nazi and Fascist clauses, they might have popular appeal, but such ideologies aren't always bad. That's not too big though.

Could change the first fascist to oppressive, but that's very minor.

On the FURTHER REALIZING clause, has Greater Nepal ever used such weapons in conflict?

From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?

Otherwise, a pretty damn fine basis.

FURTHER REALIZING:
d. Has purposely threatened to use and has actively used nuclear weapons on both WA and non-WA nations alike.

Might need rephrasing, but the above is in essence true.

South Norwega wrote:Righto, let's have a go.

Condemn Great Nepal

The Security Council,

RECOGNIZING the United Kingdom of Great Nepal as a fascist dictatorship.

NOTING that Great Nepal grants little to no political rights to its population of citizens.

INSULTED at the fact the the United Kingdom of Great Nepal made a mockery of the World Assembly and its resolutions by actively and fully participating in slave trade while still a member of the World Assembly.

UNNERVED that Great Nepal has actively donated to Nazi and Fascist organizations, including political parties solely operating in other nations.

HORRIFIED that Great Nepal has committed, and admitted to abusing the population in ways proven such as:
a. Executing children in schools of all grade levels for being suspected of "bullying."
b. Killing all children before the age of four suspected to be homosexual, even though it would be near impossible to know at that young age, and only allowing children to live if they pay currency to the government.

FURTHER REALIZING that Great Nepal has shown itself to be a threat to the world by actions such as:
a. Actively searching for cheap nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
b. Gloating about having nuclear weapons to World Assembly members.
c. Creating or purchasing viruses and biological weapons.

HEREBY Condemns Great Nepal

There are no glaring errors. Not too sure on the Nazi and Fascist clauses, they might have popular appeal, but such ideologies aren't always bad. That's not too big though.

Could change the first fascist to oppressive, but that's very minor.

On the FURTHER REALIZING clause, has Greater Nepal ever used such weapons in conflict?

From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?

Otherwise, a pretty damn fine basis.

The thing that makes Great Nepal stand out, and was the action that prompted this was the "INSULTED" clause.

Of the Quendi wrote:

From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?

Precisely. Great Nepal is no worse than so many other nations and i doubt that this can go through.

See "INSULTED" clause.

Well, I'm actually quite impressed with the improvements. Good job!

I'm sure there are "tweaks" in order, however I'm not really available to dig deep and discover them at the moment... I'll take a look at it when I have time.

So do you, honored ambassadors, think it is ready to be submitted?

LOL, it's about time Great Nepal got a condemnation.

This is horrible! We must condemn him!!!!

Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuke testing areas. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old. (Yes, I was VERY stupid when I first joined..

Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuclear wastelands. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old.

WTF is wrong with this guy!?

I agree wholeheartedly with this proposal. If it reaches the floor, I will definitely vote for it.

Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuke testing areas. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old. (Yes, I was VERY stupid when I first joined..

Wow, I wasn't even aware of stuff like that. Jerk...

Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuke testing areas. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old. (Yes, I was VERY stupid when I first joined..

Hmmm..can I get links? I wish to see this. I've heard of threatening full warfare against them, but never anyone actually nuking them. That's madness. insanity.

Picklepoo wrote:

Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuclear wastelands. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old.

WTF is wrong with this guy!?

I'm his friend in some RPs but when you talk about the nation of Great Nepal when not RPing, I hate his guts and he is VERY insane.
P.S. When he nuked me and Des-Bal and Reich1 did too, I was dumb enough to godmode.

Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuke testing areas. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old. (Yes, I was VERY stupid when I first joined..

Yeah GN likes to nuke everything, in fact one time, I joined in a war against him and he sent 30 nukes, I just used my Ignore Lasers to shoot them down.

Link 1 (The posts in the beginning looked okay, in the middle everything got heated, and in the end it was better):
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=36977

Linky 2:
(Yes, I bullied along but I didn't nuke him as bad as GN did! And I always godmoded when I was new, trust me.)
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=39703&start=0