by Denecaep » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:12 pm
by South Norwega » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:29 am
Condemn Great Nepal
The Security Council,
RECOGNIZING the United Kingdom of Great Nepal as a fascist dictatorship.
NOTING that Great Nepal grants little to no political rights to its population of citizens.
INSULTED at the fact the the United Kingdom of Great Nepal made a mockery of the World Assembly and its resolutions by actively and fully participating in slave trade while still a member of the World Assembly.
UNNERVED that Great Nepal has actively donated to Nazi and Fascist organizations, including political parties solely operating in other nations.
HORRIFIED that Great Nepal has committed, and admitted to abusing the population in ways proven such as:
a. Executing children in schools of all grade levels for being suspected of "bullying."
b. Killing all children before the age of four suspected to be homosexual, even though it would be near impossible to know at that young age, and only allowing children to live if they pay currency to the government.
FURTHER REALIZING that Great Nepal has shown itself to be a threat to the world by actions such as:
a. Actively searching for cheap nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
b. Gloating about having nuclear weapons to World Assembly members.
c. Creating or purchasing viruses and biological weapons.
HEREBY Condemns Great Nepal
by Of the Quendi » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:34 am
From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?
by Sungai Pusat » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:42 am
by Sungai Pusat » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:57 am
Great Nepal wrote:We want 8000 slaves to work in our wepons factorys, we dont care about there race, sex etc. But we want them to be a child, and slim. More details are in the following form.
Name of State: Great Nepal
Head of Slave or Trade department (if applicable): N/A
Sex slaves (Y or N): No
Age group of slaves: Child
Characteristics: We dont care about this (just send which is cheapest)
Body condition: Slim
Special requests: Please send slaves who are able to work long and hard.
Great Nepal wrote:To: Orlkjestad
From: Great Nepal
We are shocked to hear your message. You say you believe in freedom but oppose people who believes in slave trade? You may not like slave trade, we have nothing to say in it but we believe in slave trade so we have our right to practice it. And there is also a question of Free market. Every nation have its own views so we urge not to interference in the personal matter of a nation, it is considered immoral. And about declaring a war, we dont think this is a good reason to declare a war.
-Dictator Of Great Nepal.
by Hindopia » Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:07 am
South Norwega wrote:There are no glaring errors. Not too sure on the Nazi and Fascist clauses, they might have popular appeal, but such ideologies aren't always bad. That's not too big though.
Could change the first fascist to oppressive, but that's very minor.
On the FURTHER REALIZING clause, has Greater Nepal ever used such weapons in conflict?
From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?
Otherwise, a pretty damn fine basis.
by Eastfield Lodge » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:47 pm
South Norwega wrote:Righto, let's have a go.Condemn Great Nepal
The Security Council,
RECOGNIZING the United Kingdom of Great Nepal as a fascist dictatorship.
NOTING that Great Nepal grants little to no political rights to its population of citizens.
INSULTED at the fact the the United Kingdom of Great Nepal made a mockery of the World Assembly and its resolutions by actively and fully participating in slave trade while still a member of the World Assembly.
UNNERVED that Great Nepal has actively donated to Nazi and Fascist organizations, including political parties solely operating in other nations.
HORRIFIED that Great Nepal has committed, and admitted to abusing the population in ways proven such as:
a. Executing children in schools of all grade levels for being suspected of "bullying."
b. Killing all children before the age of four suspected to be homosexual, even though it would be near impossible to know at that young age, and only allowing children to live if they pay currency to the government.
FURTHER REALIZING that Great Nepal has shown itself to be a threat to the world by actions such as:
a. Actively searching for cheap nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
b. Gloating about having nuclear weapons to World Assembly members.
c. Creating or purchasing viruses and biological weapons.
HEREBY Condemns Great Nepal
There are no glaring errors. Not too sure on the Nazi and Fascist clauses, they might have popular appeal, but such ideologies aren't always bad. That's not too big though.
Could change the first fascist to oppressive, but that's very minor.
On the FURTHER REALIZING clause, has Greater Nepal ever used such weapons in conflict?
From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?
Otherwise, a pretty damn fine basis.
by Denecaep » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:52 pm
South Norwega wrote:Righto, let's have a go.Condemn Great Nepal
The Security Council,
RECOGNIZING the United Kingdom of Great Nepal as a fascist dictatorship.
NOTING that Great Nepal grants little to no political rights to its population of citizens.
INSULTED at the fact the the United Kingdom of Great Nepal made a mockery of the World Assembly and its resolutions by actively and fully participating in slave trade while still a member of the World Assembly.
UNNERVED that Great Nepal has actively donated to Nazi and Fascist organizations, including political parties solely operating in other nations.
HORRIFIED that Great Nepal has committed, and admitted to abusing the population in ways proven such as:
a. Executing children in schools of all grade levels for being suspected of "bullying."
b. Killing all children before the age of four suspected to be homosexual, even though it would be near impossible to know at that young age, and only allowing children to live if they pay currency to the government.
FURTHER REALIZING that Great Nepal has shown itself to be a threat to the world by actions such as:
a. Actively searching for cheap nuclear weapons for offensive purposes.
b. Gloating about having nuclear weapons to World Assembly members.
c. Creating or purchasing viruses and biological weapons.
HEREBY Condemns Great Nepal
There are no glaring errors. Not too sure on the Nazi and Fascist clauses, they might have popular appeal, but such ideologies aren't always bad. That's not too big though.
Could change the first fascist to oppressive, but that's very minor.
On the FURTHER REALIZING clause, has Greater Nepal ever used such weapons in conflict?
From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?
Otherwise, a pretty damn fine basis.
by Denecaep » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:55 pm
Of the Quendi wrote:From just looking at this resolution I'd think this to be a standard totalitarian thing. What makes Greater Nepal stand out from the crowd?
Precisely. Great Nepal is no worse than so many other nations and i doubt that this can go through.
by A mean old man » Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:49 pm
by The Rich Port » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:42 pm
by Picklepoo » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:42 pm
by Frenca » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:43 pm
by Picklepoo » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:45 pm
Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuclear wastelands. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old.
by Pythria » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:48 pm
Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuke testing areas. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old. (Yes, I was VERY stupid when I first joined..
by New Amerik » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:48 pm
Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuke testing areas. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old. (Yes, I was VERY stupid when I first joined..
by Frenca » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:49 pm
by East Fancainia » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:50 pm
Frenca wrote:Add that Great Nepal uses new nations that haven't read the stickies as nuke testing areas. He seriously did that to:
New Hun Empire
Nazi Prussian Reich
and me, when I was only 4 days old. (Yes, I was VERY stupid when I first joined..
by Frenca » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:52 pm
by Frenca » Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:56 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement