BlackLight Covenant wrote:"A'ight, so how's this an internatio-...interversa-...interdimen-...intersomethin' issue? I'm all for the Assembly stickin' its nose in the business of member states, considerin' how that's its main function 'n all that, but this just seems like micromanagement taken to the extreme. Besides, the WA has no damn business interferin' in whether member-states want to make some substance legal or not for as far as I'm concerned; we can support something related to...I dunno, bannin' the summary execution of drug addicts or somethin', although that probably already exists considerin' the sheer volume of the Assembly's book of intersomethin' law , but this one's just goin' too far. I s'ppose there's somethin' about bein' poorly written as well, but I doubt I've the right to judge that one."
Agreed. While the intention towards personal freedom is honorable, the World Assembly has no place managing how member states' regulate substance use. Today its marijuana; tomorrow, who knows? The High King and his council firmly objects to this proposal, in the name of anti-micromanagement.