Jutsa wrote:"Correct, but rampant inaccessibility is supposed to be the whole point of this legislation's acting toward reducing, and, in fact, a non-insignificant part of existing legislation.
Furthermore, I still fail to see how having the state pay for and provide travel to conflicting nations, regardless of other circumstances,
such as disease, the potential for armed conflict, non-WA status thus having potentially lower safety standards, etc, would be a good idea in practice."
"The qualifications for protected travel are identical to those in GAR #456. These are further qualified by the phrase 'unless permitted by resolution', and by clause 8's automatic deference to antecedent law. A brief search through the World Assembly law code," Ogenbond flips open a pocketbook entitled "Passed General Assembly Resolutions: #1-475" and finds the bookmarked pages, "reveals that such resolutions as #53 Epidemic Response Act are of particular importance in the matter of public health and safety. Your concerns are unwarranted. Please do your research."