Ones that back up your statement that "this is a useless and unnecessary peice of legislation"? I think not...
Advertisement
by The New California Republic » Fri May 22, 2020 9:12 am
by Deathfall » Fri May 22, 2020 9:50 am
by Groot » Sat May 23, 2020 7:08 am
Kenmoria wrote:It must have dropped 5 approvals just before the deadline closed.
telegram wrote:The Ancient Baptist Republic of New Waldensia
1 day 14 hours ago
I'll gift you an Epic card if you remove your approval on Access to Abortion (page=UN_view_proposal/id=imperium_anglorum_1589840511)
by Kenmoria » Sat May 23, 2020 9:47 am
Groot wrote:OOC:Kenmoria wrote:It must have dropped 5 approvals just before the deadline closed.
Yes, and this might be one reason why:telegram wrote:The Ancient Baptist Republic of New Waldensia
1 day 14 hours ago
I'll gift you an Epic card if you remove your approval on Access to Abortion (page=UN_view_proposal/id=imperium_anglorum_1589840511)
by The New California Republic » Sat May 23, 2020 9:50 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:Ooc: why on earth do you think there was no response to the bribery going on?
by The New California Republic » Sun May 24, 2020 4:35 pm
Codd wrote:In my nation, abortion is regarded as an act of murder punishable by life imprisonment. I will not be approving it for the que.
by Godular » Sun May 24, 2020 4:39 pm
by Wallenburg » Sun May 24, 2020 4:54 pm
Codd wrote:In my nation, abortion is regarded as an act of murder punishable by life imprisonment. I will not be approving it for the que.
by Slaughter None » Thu May 28, 2020 8:45 am
Deathfall wrote:EDIT: Let me clarify: nobody cares that this proposal is a "joke".
by Separatist Peoples » Thu May 28, 2020 9:06 am
by Morover » Thu May 28, 2020 1:51 pm
Gogtopia wrote:Can't see myself voting for this one... Abortion is a very broad topic and it seems like you are violating the "No ban on ideology" rule here.
by The New California Republic » Thu May 28, 2020 2:46 pm
Gogtopia wrote:Can't see myself voting for this one... Abortion is a very broad topic and it seems like you are violating the "No ban on ideology" rule here.
by The New California Republic » Thu May 28, 2020 3:36 pm
La xinga wrote:Gogtopia wrote:Can't see myself voting for this one... Abortion is a very broad topic and it seems like you are violating the "No ban on ideology" rule here.The New California Republic wrote:...no...? Where are you getting that from?
If Judaism is considered an ideology, possibly it's violating that?
by La Xinga » Thu May 28, 2020 3:39 pm
Wallenburg wrote:Codd wrote:In my nation, abortion is regarded as an act of murder punishable by life imprisonment. I will not be approving it for the que.
If so, you are in violation of GAR #128 and #286, and therefore subject to fines and embargoes under the Administrative Compliance Act and prosecution in the courts of the World Assembly Judiciary Committee.
by Separatist Peoples » Thu May 28, 2020 5:14 pm
La xinga wrote:...but again it's not banning an ideology.Wallenburg wrote:If so, you are in violation of GAR #128 and #286, and therefore subject to fines and embargoes under the Administrative Compliance Act and prosecution in the courts of the World Assembly Judiciary Committee.
OOC: Shoot it, I'm also then.The New California Republic wrote:
OOC: I by mistake make something wrong with the quote, srry.
IC: It better not. In all, my nation's leader says this resolution is murder.
OOC: Where is this meeting held at? Ransium? Grays harbor?
by Atheris » Thu May 28, 2020 5:15 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Thu May 28, 2020 5:15 pm
Gogtopia wrote:Can't see myself voting for this one... Abortion is a very broad topic and it seems like you are violating the "No ban on ideology" rule here.
by Wallenburg » Thu May 28, 2020 6:19 pm
by Honeydewistania » Thu May 28, 2020 6:22 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:La xinga wrote:OOC: Shoot it, I'm also then.
OOC: I by mistake make something wrong with the quote, srry.
IC: It better not. In all, my nation's leader says this resolution is murder.
OOC: Where is this meeting held at? Ransium? Grays harbor?
OOC: The WAHQ is in international territory.
Also, if you don't comply, nobody in this forum is going to pay any attention. Noncompliance is broadly considered godmodding and gets you ignored. After all, if we all play by the rules, why on earth would we accommodate somebody not playing by the rules?
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Godular » Thu May 28, 2020 6:33 pm
Honeydewistania wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:OOC: The WAHQ is in international territory.
Also, if you don't comply, nobody in this forum is going to pay any attention. Noncompliance is broadly considered godmodding and gets you ignored. After all, if we all play by the rules, why on earth would we accommodate somebody not playing by the rules?
"Can we build abortionplexes outside the WAHQ? So that WA ambassadors can go and have an abortion right after a meeting, without international customs and stuff like that."
by Champagne Socialist Sharifistan » Fri May 29, 2020 2:48 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:La xinga wrote:OOC: Shoot it, I'm also then.
OOC: I by mistake make something wrong with the quote, srry.
IC: It better not. In all, my nation's leader says this resolution is murder.
OOC: Where is this meeting held at? Ransium? Grays harbor?
OOC: The WAHQ is in international territory.
Also, if you don't comply, nobody in this forum is going to pay any attention. Noncompliance is broadly considered godmodding and gets you ignored. After all, if we all play by the rules, why on earth would we accommodate somebody not playing by the rules?
by Champagne Socialist Sharifistan » Fri May 29, 2020 2:54 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement