Advertisement
by Tarnik » Sat Feb 15, 2020 10:22 pm
by The Gilded Star » Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:10 pm
Tarnik wrote:Everyone here is clearly allowing real world bias and historic track record of actual Nazis to cloud their judgement in a game that is supposed to be separated from those things.
Please, can we stop with the LARP-ing? Raiding is nothing but a game of numbers and organization, it has no lasting effects on anyone. Playing the raiding game is just that, it is not going to damage anyone, regardless of which side is on the receiving end. As such, it is useless in the "fight against communism", just as it is useless in their fight against us. Even the bragging rights earned by a successful raid are questionable, taking raiding seriously, or even considering it to be a genuine war of ideologies is a ridiculous notion. Want to actually do some good here? Then start treating this site not as a game, but as a platform. Raiding is not a serious business, spreading real messages is. Just watch out for those low-flying forum bans.
by Kavagrad » Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:17 pm
New Jakobly wrote:What I see here is a potential for the World Assembly to become chatoic, as more and more personally motivated attacks would come about.
Many right-wingers dislike NationStates for the reason of these motivated attacks against their ideologies, and this blatant abuse of the system needs to stop.
by Draganisia » Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:35 pm
by Jakker » Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:36 pm
Draganisia wrote:Because if you truly support these sorts of "liberations" (Region Destructions) than you are truly no better than the lowest raiders like the fricken Black Hawks!
The Bruce wrote:Mostly I feel sorry for [raiders], because they put in all this effort and at the end of the day have nothing to show for it and have created nothing.
by Spode Humbled Minions » Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:37 pm
Tarnik wrote:Everyone here is clearly allowing real world bias and historic track record of actual Nazis to cloud their judgement in a game that is supposed to be separated from those things. The reactionary response of "There's a fascist kill it!" is just as bad as the fascism you're claiming to be against. This is an unwarranted attack force our viewpoint on someone simply because they are different.
I could support this resolution if it were at least better worded. Right now it sounds like a middle schooler wrote it and uses a lot of emotion in a legal document. Its goals are noble, but its method of achieving them are worse than the thing they aim to destroy.
New Jakobly wrote:Bormiar wrote:So you’re going to liberate every passworded, founderless, fascist region?
Exactly what I was thinking.Kavagrad wrote:I fail to see the problem.
That is because of your ideology's association with Antifa. You would be mad if us right-wingers tried to liberate or condemn every communist, socialist, or left-wing region for no reason, so why should you all go ahead and do this.
by Draganisia » Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:38 pm
by Jakker » Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:47 pm
Draganisia wrote:And unlike this proposal my vote has nothing to do with ideology.
Would be saying the same thing even if this was against a full on Communist region.
As long as they have been peaceful with no raiding.
The Bruce wrote:Mostly I feel sorry for [raiders], because they put in all this effort and at the end of the day have nothing to show for it and have created nothing.
by Draganisia » Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:57 pm
by Roost1513 » Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:01 am
by Gorundu » Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:10 am
Roost1513 wrote:If Liberations are a tool used to remove real-life fascists from this site, we're doing it wrong. That's a moderator and an administrator thing - they should be banned, no question about it. Liberations are not the tools to use - if it is expected to, it is morally repugnant for the site administrators to 'gamify' removing fascists through limited actions such as liberations. It's a poor justification.
That being said, if there is no action done by those who have the site power to ban these real-life fascists, I'll leave this site.
by Draganisia » Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:16 am
by Tarnik » Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:34 am
Spode Humbled Minions wrote:Hello there fellow nations!
I'm Mr. Spode of the League of Conservative Nations, and NS's leading expert on the science of offensive liberations (a.k.a. I made one dispatch about it). I'm here in the forum to urge people to vote for the resolution at vote, and liberate The Union of the Axis Powers.
https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1102773
You might notice a discrepancy here. I was originally very much opposed to offensive liberations. The reason I changed my mind on that was partly the CCD-TNP affair, and the general maturity demonstrated by this legislative body in it's actions later that year. But there are some counterarguments to the proposal coming up in this thread which I'd like to address.
Firstly,Tarnik wrote:Everyone here is clearly allowing real world bias and historic track record of actual Nazis to cloud their judgement in a game that is supposed to be separated from those things. The reactionary response of "There's a fascist kill it!" is just as bad as the fascism you're claiming to be against. This is an unwarranted attack force our viewpoint on someone simply because they are different.
I could support this resolution if it were at least better worded. Right now it sounds like a middle schooler wrote it and uses a lot of emotion in a legal document. Its goals are noble, but its method of achieving them are worse than the thing they aim to destroy.
My issue with this argument is that it is trying to equate, no, demonize, liberations attempts in comparison to fascism on NS. There is a bit of a problem here. Like, a large bit of a problem here. Since we're evidently "clearly allowing real world bias and historic track record of actual Nazis to cloud their judgement in a game that is supposed to be separated from those things", let's take a look down memory lane to what NS fascism is best known for!Wait. That was the same list as the one I had drawn up for the Nazis.
- Antisemitism
- Holocaust denial
- And endangering individuals (allegedly)
Well, there's a reason for that. These regions, these people, are actively trying to associate themselves with Nazis. Going down the rabbit hole of TUAP's embassies, guess how long it takes you to get to the same conspiracies that get promoted by IRL neonazis? The answer is two. How many clicks to get to antisemitism? Two. How many clicks does it take to get from this region to a region named "Anti Moderator Alliance", which isn't a name that has exactly 'aged well' in light of the alleged doxxing discussion facilitated by the fascists of NationStates? Two.
Don't say that it's historical Nazi-hunting blinding us unless you want what's happening right now to get brought up, because neither makes these people look any better.
ANyhOw......... Let's just slip and slide right into the next counterargument, this time coming from a colleague of mine...New Jakobly wrote:Exactly what I was thinking.
That is because of your ideology's association with Antifa. You would be mad if us right-wingers tried to liberate or condemn every communist, socialist, or left-wing region for no reason, so why should you all go ahead and do this.
We've seen with the malicious bills targeted at the LCN & FCN,S W E E T H O M E A L A B A M A
that the WA is, with the exception of some less than exceptional individuals, pretty good at distinguishing between conservatives, the right as a whole, and thefailing septic tankfascists. Which makes this bill not part of a left wing plot to crush the right, but rather, all of nationstates against fascism.
Honestly, the only part of the bill I can really find issue with is its less than impressive text. In support,
Mr. Spode
by Draganisia » Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:58 am
Spode Humbled Minions wrote:Hello there fellow nations!
I'm Mr. Spode of the League of Conservative Nations, and NS's leading expert on the science of offensive liberations (a.k.a. I made one dispatch about it). I'm here in the forum to urge people to vote for the resolution at vote, and liberate The Union of the Axis Powers.
https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1102773
You might notice a discrepancy here. I was originally very much opposed to offensive liberations. The reason I changed my mind on that was partly the CCD-TNP affair, and the general maturity demonstrated by this legislative body in it's actions later that year. But there are some counterarguments to the proposal coming up in this thread which I'd like to address.
Firstly,Tarnik wrote:Everyone here is clearly allowing real world bias and historic track record of actual Nazis to cloud their judgement in a game that is supposed to be separated from those things. The reactionary response of "There's a fascist kill it!" is just as bad as the fascism you're claiming to be against. This is an unwarranted attack force our viewpoint on someone simply because they are different.
I could support this resolution if it were at least better worded. Right now it sounds like a middle schooler wrote it and uses a lot of emotion in a legal document. Its goals are noble, but its method of achieving them are worse than the thing they aim to destroy.
My issue with this argument is that it is trying to equate, no, demonize, liberations attempts in comparison to fascism on NS. There is a bit of a problem here. Like, a large bit of a problem here. Since we're evidently "clearly allowing real world bias and historic track record of actual Nazis to cloud their judgement in a game that is supposed to be separated from those things", let's take a look down memory lane to what NS fascism is best known for!Wait. That was the same list as the one I had drawn up for the Nazis.
- Antisemitism
- Holocaust denial
- And endangering individuals (allegedly)
Well, there's a reason for that. These regions, these people, are actively trying to associate themselves with Nazis. Going down the rabbit hole of TUAP's embassies, guess how long it takes you to get to the same conspiracies that get promoted by IRL neonazis? The answer is two. How many clicks to get to antisemitism? Two. How many clicks does it take to get from this region to a region named "Anti Moderator Alliance", which isn't a name that has exactly 'aged well' in light of the alleged doxxing discussion facilitated by the fascists of NationStates? Two.
Don't say that it's historical Nazi-hunting blinding us unless you want what's happening right now to get brought up, because neither makes these people look any better.
ANyhOw......... Let's just slip and slide right into the next counterargument, this time coming from a colleague of mine...New Jakobly wrote:Exactly what I was thinking.
That is because of your ideology's association with Antifa. You would be mad if us right-wingers tried to liberate or condemn every communist, socialist, or left-wing region for no reason, so why should you all go ahead and do this.
We've seen with the malicious bills targeted at the LCN & FCN,S W E E T H O M E A L A B A M A
that the WA is, with the exception of some less than exceptional individuals, pretty good at distinguishing between conservatives, the right as a whole, and thefailing septic tankfascists. Which makes this bill not part of a left wing plot to crush the right, but rather, all of nationstates against fascism.
Honestly, the only part of the bill I can really find issue with is its less than impressive text. In support,
Mr. Spode
by Garvtopia » Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:14 am
by Draganisia » Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:53 am
Garvtopia wrote:Fascists do so love to claim that intolerance of fascism is as bad as fascism. I, on the other hand, love pointing out that they're at least admitting that fascism is bad.
Folks can go on about how wrong it is to target a region because of its ideology all they want, but when it comes down to it, people deserve respect by default and ideas do not. And when people espouse and attempt to spread ideas that demonize others for who they are rather than what they have done, they no longer deserve respect by default either. (Because of what they, as individuals, have done. See how that works? It's a subtle but important distinction.)
It is the moral imperative of all thinking beings to strike down fascism wherever we see it. No matter how small, and no matter how much of a waste of time someone tries to convince us it is. It took me maybe thirty seconds to read the proposal and vote in favor, and a few minutes to write this post. If that helped in any way to ensure that even an ineffectual, nearly-invisible source of fascist ideology goes away... I consider it time well spent.
by Cornelia Li Britannia » Sun Feb 16, 2020 2:03 am
by Xeknos » Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:02 am
Garvtopia wrote:Fascists do so love to claim that intolerance of fascism is as bad as fascism. I, on the other hand, love pointing out that they're at least admitting that fascism is bad.
Folks can go on about how wrong it is to target a region because of its ideology all they want, but when it comes down to it, people deserve respect by default and ideas do not. And when people espouse and attempt to spread ideas that demonize others for who they are rather than what they have done, they no longer deserve respect by default either. (Because of what they, as individuals, have done. See how that works? It's a subtle but important distinction.)
It is the moral imperative of all thinking beings to strike down fascism wherever we see it. No matter how small, and no matter how much of a waste of time someone tries to convince us it is. It took me maybe thirty seconds to read the proposal and vote in favor, and a few minutes to write this post. If that helped in any way to ensure that even an ineffectual, nearly-invisible source of fascist ideology goes away... I consider it time well spent.
by Bears Armed » Sun Feb 16, 2020 4:38 am
by Gorundu » Sun Feb 16, 2020 4:55 am
Bears Armed wrote:OOC
I won't support any proposals like this until the SC starts making credible attempts at doing the same to 'Far Left'-themed regions as well.
by Bears Armed » Sun Feb 16, 2020 5:24 am
Gorundu wrote:Bears Armed wrote:OOC
I won't support any proposals like this until the SC starts making credible attempts at doing the same to 'Far Left'-themed regions as well.
What's so terrible about far-left themed regions? Calling for revolution is not the same as discriminating against minorities.
by Marxist Germany » Sun Feb 16, 2020 6:15 am
by Socialist Macronesia » Sun Feb 16, 2020 7:30 am
Wayneactia wrote:Socialist Macronesia wrote:
That's kind of my point. This is blurring the lines between raiders and defenders.
Not really. The one thing fendas and raiders can agree on is that fascists need to be dealt with. They like to hide behind passworded regions thinking they are invincible. This shows them that they are not as well protected as they like to think they are.
by BlackLight Covenant » Sun Feb 16, 2020 7:32 am
BlackLight Covenant wrote:Ignoring the ideological side of things, as I'm not too interested in joining the drama related to R/D gameplay built around ideologies, have these fellas ever done anything significant? Beyond participating in some failed raid which, knowing the recent turbulence of NS over it, I somehow suspect to be related to CCD.
Never heard of em before until this proposal showed up.
by Gwrachbyd » Sun Feb 16, 2020 9:50 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement