NATION

PASSWORD

[DEFEATED] Limitation of Inhumane Weaponry

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Joshii
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Feb 23, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Joshii » Sun Feb 23, 2020 10:49 pm

I must say, we don't need all the weapons in the world to defend ourselves from foreign attacks...

As long as there is peace in the world, these are unecessary

User avatar
BlackLight Covenant
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 138
Founded: Apr 24, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby BlackLight Covenant » Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:32 am

Joshii wrote:I must say, we don't need all the weapons in the world to defend ourselves from foreign attacks...

As long as there is peace in the world, these are unecessary


Lovik quietly chuckled behind her desk at the remark.

"Peace through force, ambassador, peace through force. It would've been a happy fun time if that statement of yours was possible, but we sure as hell ain't gonna try it out to see if it works, considerin' how our entire galaxy is filled with nations that need a buncha guns pointed at 'em in order to bugger off, and sometimes, those guns need to be 'bout as gruesome as possible. For the sake of our national security, there ain't a chance I'd vote for something like this proposal."

Blacklight is an isolationist, and notably xenophobic, interstellar corporatocracy.
Its government and society are made up of three massive conglomerates.
They maintain joint control over affairs normal governments would otherwise be concerned with.

Ellen Lovik
- Secondary Multiversal Ambassador
- 2nd Corporate Representative to the World Assembly, currently replacing Dietrich Latvala
- Mentally mildly stuck in the mindset of her time as riot control officer



Currently the most general officer of generic things, common issues, and standard matters for The Glorious Nations of Iwaku, and Observer of Intergalactic Law as The Armada of Refuge for Eientei Gensokyo!


User avatar
Tecrossh
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Feb 13, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Tecrossh » Mon Feb 24, 2020 9:45 am

BlackLight Covenant wrote:
Joshii wrote: It would've been a happy fun time if that statement of yours was possible, but we sure as hell ain't gonna try it out to see if it works


I must say this alone is what worries me. We can sit here and philosophise about how pleasant a world free of war and strife would be, and how useless weapons would become, but that future is not feasible. What can hold back the waves of tyranny or the strikes of evil more than weaponry? Tecrossh is small and weak. We depend on our weaponry to keep us safe from those who seek to do us harm.

I understand this proposal is to only ban inhumane weaponry, but its writing is loose and its articles flexible. Who is to say if an automatic rifle is humane or no? Who is to judge which weapons can be used and which cannot? If gas or bombs will protect Tecrossh than they will be used. They should be used. Agressors should be punished and detered, and sometimes bullets will not do.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13705
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Mon Feb 24, 2020 11:52 am

"Limitation of Inhumane Weaponry" was gunned down 10,575 votes to 4,657.
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading The World by Simon Sebag Montefiore

User avatar
Cisairse
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10935
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cisairse » Mon Feb 24, 2020 12:01 pm

"With a stunning 25-point loss, I am forced to wonder if this resolution would ever have a chance at passing even if the unclear and ambiguous language was resolved."
The details of the above post are subject to leftist infighting.

I officially endorse Fivey Fox for president of the United States.

User avatar
Human Rights Violation
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Jul 09, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Human Rights Violation » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:26 am

Can someone explain what a humane weapon is anyway? A weapon designed to be humane is pretty funny to me.

User avatar
The Yellow Monkey
Attaché
 
Posts: 85
Founded: Jan 13, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby The Yellow Monkey » Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:36 am

Human Rights Violation wrote:Can someone explain what a humane weapon is anyway?

A gun that shoots a bullet which gently tickles you until you surrender or 10 minutes go by, at which point it kills you instantly and with no pain.
Last edited by The Yellow Monkey on Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:37 am, edited 2 times in total.

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Merethin

Advertisement

Remove ads