Advertisement
by Imperium Anglorum » Sat Jan 18, 2020 5:39 pm
by Araraukar » Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:29 am
Umeria wrote:The title has been changed, but what I really want to change is the subtitle. I'm not sure anything can look good next to "A resolution to slash worldwide military spending."
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Umeria » Tue Jan 21, 2020 9:09 pm
Araraukar wrote:Umeria wrote:The title has been changed, but what I really want to change is the subtitle. I'm not sure anything can look good next to "A resolution to slash worldwide military spending."
OOC: ...it'll look good for everyone who thinks that there's too much money spent on military stuff (often for waging wars outside of your own country) and not enough spent on domestic civilian issues like healthcare or education.
by Araraukar » Sun Apr 12, 2020 2:41 am
Umeria wrote:After a months-long coma from an unfortunate collision with the Stranger's Bar, Lockwood is refreshed and prepared to discuss the merits of his proposal.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Araraukar » Sun Apr 12, 2020 6:58 pm
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Imperium Anglorum » Sun Apr 12, 2020 7:21 pm
by Flying Eagles » Sat Jul 11, 2020 4:02 pm
by Umeria » Sat Jul 11, 2020 5:22 pm
Flying Eagles wrote:Full support. Could there be a better title though? We feel this resolution extends well beyond first contact.
by Shazbotdom » Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:04 pm
ShazWeb || IIWiki || Discord: shazbertbot || 1 x NFL Picks League Champion (2021)
CosmoCast || SISA || CCD || CrawDaddy || SCIA || COPEC || Boudreaux's || CLS || SNC || ShazAir || BHC || TWO
NHL RND 1: COL 4 - 1 WPG | VGK 2 - 3 DAL | RND 2: NYR 0 - 0 CAR
NCAA MBB: Tulane 24-20 | LSU 28-17 || NCAA WSB: LSU 36-13
by Umeria » Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:17 pm
Shazbotdom wrote:"The Empire will be voting against this, for reasons that are our own. But mainly, 'First Contact' situations have rarely, if ever, resulted in War. So, this is really an unneeded resolution and would be useless for the General Assembly to even consider making it into International Law."
by Shazbotdom » Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:21 pm
Umeria wrote:Shazbotdom wrote:"The Empire will be voting against this, for reasons that are our own. But mainly, 'First Contact' situations have rarely, if ever, resulted in War. So, this is really an unneeded resolution and would be useless for the General Assembly to even consider making it into International Law."
"The notion that a slight risk of catastrophe should simply be ignored is absurd. It's akin to having no safeguards in a nuclear power plant."
ShazWeb || IIWiki || Discord: shazbertbot || 1 x NFL Picks League Champion (2021)
CosmoCast || SISA || CCD || CrawDaddy || SCIA || COPEC || Boudreaux's || CLS || SNC || ShazAir || BHC || TWO
NHL RND 1: COL 4 - 1 WPG | VGK 2 - 3 DAL | RND 2: NYR 0 - 0 CAR
NCAA MBB: Tulane 24-20 | LSU 28-17 || NCAA WSB: LSU 36-13
by Umeria » Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:25 pm
Shazbotdom wrote:Umeria wrote:"The notion that a slight risk of catastrophe should simply be ignored is absurd. It's akin to having no safeguards in a nuclear power plant."
"There is no correlation between this Proposal and having no safeguards at a Nuclear Power Plant. The fact that you attempted this correlation is most likely the reason why this Proposal is currently failing so bad within the first two hours of voting within the General Assembly," Antoine stated, sipping his coffee to wake himself up after a long overnight flight back to the WA Headquarters from the Imperial Mainland.
by WayNeacTia » Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:26 pm
Umeria wrote:Shazbotdom wrote:"There is no correlation between this Proposal and having no safeguards at a Nuclear Power Plant. The fact that you attempted this correlation is most likely the reason why this Proposal is currently failing so bad within the first two hours of voting within the General Assembly," Antoine stated, sipping his coffee to wake himself up after a long overnight flight back to the WA Headquarters from the Imperial Mainland.
"Actually the reason why this proposal is failing is because the delegation from the South Pacific was influenced by several unhinged warmongers."
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Shazbotdom » Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:28 pm
Umeria wrote:Shazbotdom wrote:"There is no correlation between this Proposal and having no safeguards at a Nuclear Power Plant. The fact that you attempted this correlation is most likely the reason why this Proposal is currently failing so bad within the first two hours of voting within the General Assembly," Antoine stated, sipping his coffee to wake himself up after a long overnight flight back to the WA Headquarters from the Imperial Mainland.
"Actually the reason why this proposal is failing is because the delegation from the South Pacific was influenced by several unhinged warmongers."
ShazWeb || IIWiki || Discord: shazbertbot || 1 x NFL Picks League Champion (2021)
CosmoCast || SISA || CCD || CrawDaddy || SCIA || COPEC || Boudreaux's || CLS || SNC || ShazAir || BHC || TWO
NHL RND 1: COL 4 - 1 WPG | VGK 2 - 3 DAL | RND 2: NYR 0 - 0 CAR
NCAA MBB: Tulane 24-20 | LSU 28-17 || NCAA WSB: LSU 36-13
by Union of Sovereign States and Republics » Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:29 pm
News: BREAKING NEWS: Unceremoniously, USSR officially departs from the European Union 2 years before schedule
by The Grand Imperial Reich » Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:37 pm
by Umeria » Mon Jul 13, 2020 11:05 pm
Shazbotdom wrote:"The Delegations of those regions are not 'influenced by several unhinged warmongers'. They were influenced because it is a poorly written out proposal on a subject that is such a waste of this August Body's time that it is laughable that it was even submitted."
Shazbotdom wrote:"If it would please the GenSec, can we please, for God's sake, throw this proposal into the incinerator?"
Union of Sovereign States and Republics wrote:"The Soviet Union is in opposition to this proposal. While a noteworthy endeavor, it just falls flat. There is only one clause; while not a problem in of itself, there is a problem that arises with the way it is written. What is the definition of a vehicle in this sense? A tricycle or a tank?"
Union of Sovereign States and Republics wrote:"The Soviet Union would stand for this proposal if this was defined as being a military vehicle, but as it stands, a family in their truck from the USSR entering another nation on vacation could be seen as an act of war."
The Grand Imperial Reich wrote:Against, this seems rather unnecessary and not something that needs to put through the WA.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement