NationStates

Yokiria wrote:

Kananji wrote:HOW COULD YOU! This country has committed the worst war crimes imaginable, and you SUPPORT HIM! You may be next to be attacked. Think about it. He has crossed the line and should be Condemned. -President of Kananji

My invincible anti-everything shields protect my nation from crazy roleplayers, so there's nothing to worry about.

Yokiria wrote:

Kananji wrote:HOW COULD YOU! This country has committed the worst war crimes imaginable, and you SUPPORT HIM! You may be next to be attacked. Think about it. He has crossed the line and should be Condemned. -President of Kananji

My invincible anti-everything shields protect my nation from crazy roleplayers, so there's nothing to worry about.

Kananji wrote:We need to condemn Norrlands as soon as possible in order to ensure better safety of our world. -President of Kananji

Kananji wrote:

Yokiria wrote:My invincible anti-everything shields protect my nation from crazy roleplayers, so there's nothing to worry about.

Then get the (censored) out of the World Assembly -President of Kananji

Kananji wrote:We need to condemn Norrlands as soon as possible in order to ensure better safety of our world. -President of Kananji

Ultior wrote:

Tinhampton wrote:
For future reference: I did not do any "lobbying" beyond what I have written in this thread (if I really wanted to tank it, I'd have used New Islet to send out a telegram to delegates asking them to unapprove this) - and I've complained a lot about this proposal, yes, but mostly to myself

You campaigned against it on the TNP forums and succeeded in getting the region to vote 100% against. That's called lobbying. Maybe you didn't send out mass TGs, but your efforts were enough to ensure its defeat. There's no reason to lie to me about this- I was aware that my chances of success were low from the start.

Lets be honest- If you really thought the proposal was that terrible, you would have realized that it wouldn't pass and would have let it die on its own. I find it very hard to believe that was the only reason why you spent so much time campaigning against it. I find it plausible that there were a few personal motives involved here (for the record, I am not accusing you of conspiracy, this is different).

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:While your proposal was well written you have obviously not done enough to convince members and delegates of the need to condemn Norrlands.

Blaming Tinhampton for your inability to do this is unfair. Any blame rests with you, the author.

I'm not entirely blaming Tinhampton for this, although he played a major role in its defeat.

Me and another nation sent out TGs asking for approvals and votes, which is probably the only reason why it even made it to vote. However, the super delegates and feeders were against the proposal. Once they are against a proposal, it tends to fail. Tin's lobbying didn't help with that.