Advertisement
by Marxist Germany » Fri Oct 25, 2019 7:08 am
by Marxist Germany » Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:21 pm
by Kenmoria » Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:25 pm
by Marxist Germany » Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:26 pm
Kenmoria wrote:“Clause 7 should end with a full stop.”
by Imperium Anglorum » Mon Oct 28, 2019 4:31 pm
by Bears Armed » Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:19 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Infra.Noting that mistreatment of animal test subjects may lead to severe distress for the animal and inaccurate research results,
should end with an "and".
by Marxist Germany » Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:32 am
by Bears Armed » Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:37 am
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:01 am
by Kenmoria » Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:15 am
by Marxist Germany » Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:05 pm
Kenmoria wrote:“2b should have ‘reporting’ as opposed to ‘report’.”
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:48 pm
Concerned by the lack of legislation regarding the treatment of testing animals,
Recognising that animals deserve to be properly treated during, and after testing,
Noting that mistreatment of animal test subjects may lead to severe distress for the animal, and inaccurate research results, and,
Seeking to establish regulations on the treatment of animal test subjects,
by Marxist Germany » Tue Oct 29, 2019 6:15 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Concerned by the lack of legislation regarding the treatment of testing animals,
Recognising that animals deserve to be properly treated during, and after testing,
Noting that mistreatment of animal test subjects may lead to severe distress for the animal, and inaccurate research results, and,
Seeking to establish regulations on the treatment of animal test subjects,
Bolding is unnecessary. The commas highlighted in red are incorrectly placed.
by Marxist Germany » Mon Nov 04, 2019 11:17 am
by Araraukar » Tue Nov 05, 2019 2:14 pm
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Marxist Germany » Tue Nov 05, 2019 3:03 pm
by Marxist Germany » Sat Nov 09, 2019 7:11 am
by Marxist Germany » Tue Nov 12, 2019 10:35 am
by Kenmoria » Tue Nov 12, 2019 11:56 am
by Marxist Germany » Wed Nov 13, 2019 3:09 pm
Kenmoria wrote:“You don’t need the second instance of ‘if it’ in clause 5a.”
by Creslonia » Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:37 pm
by Saturna1ia » Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:32 am
by Kenmoria » Sat Nov 16, 2019 2:21 pm
Saturna1ia wrote:Saturna1ians genuinely support the nature of this Resolution, but feel it does not go far enough. Specifically, the lack of a ban on animal testing for cosmetic research purposes (or at the very least a condemnation of the practice) and the lack of a section on the ethical use of animal cadavers used for studying veterinary medicine. Given this dilemma, Saturna1ia will not vote For or Against. If this Resolution fails, it our hope the issue will be taken up again strengthened and revised.
by Saturna1ia » Sat Nov 16, 2019 4:44 pm
Kenmoria wrote:“How could one unethically use animal cadavers? If they are dead, there is nothing that can be done to make them feel pain. This proposal, in my opinion, hits the ideal level of strength.”
by Outboundstagnate » Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:07 am
1b. A "test animal" as a sentient but not sapient animal in the custody of any research facility for scientific purposes
1c. "Ethical testing", and all derived terms, as testing carried out on an animal in a way that is not maliciously intended to cause severe distress or harm to the animal;
2. Establishes the World Assembly Board of Bioethics (WABB), which will be tasked with the following:
2a. Overseeing scientific experimentation in member states to ensure animal testing is being carried out ethically and in accordance with all relevant WA law;
3. Dictates that member states must reasonably and proportionally penalise research labs upon receiving a report about unethical testing from the WABB;
4a. Report all procedures carried out on animals, and euthanisations in their custody to the WABB;
5a. The animal is returned to the wild if it was captured from the wild, has a good chance of being returned to its natural habitat successfully, and if it poses no risk to the environment it is being released into, such as carrying diseases; or;
7. Prohibits the intentional killing of a test animal in a cruel manner, in addition to forbidding the killing of a former test animal before the viability of its adoption or release into the wild has been examined, and it has been found unsuitable for both.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement