Refuge Isle wrote:I'm interested in sending this in soon. Most of the critiques here have made adjustments by this third draft to accommodate them. With what remains, there might not be much to be done.
I'm more interested in Ransium's perspective that indigenous people can practice slash and burn sustainably more than I'm interested in finding a way to prevent Easter Island, politically backflipping how it's okay for the WA to be that into people's business. More importantly, I think placing restrictions on indigenous farming operations which don't meet the large scales intended could lead to a situation where they're forced to relocate to their more industrial counterparts to have enough food to live. I understand that there can be ecological damage created by those activities, but it's on a scale that's far lower than this resolution should be concerned with. This can be considered a flaw in the proposal, but any adjustment I can imagine would create much greater issues.
At this point, there are now four mandates, but I'm very happy with their wording and how easy they should be to follow in order to create some substantive preventative measures on this subject.
OOC: I will try to keep this short and sweet, because I'm quite busy IRL and I don't have much time to be typing out a lot of critique.
Basically, I share the sentiments as expressed by Ransium, Araraukar and IA. However, given that the issues raised are of minor nature in my opinion, and that this resolution is well-versed and more fluent in its definitions and mandates, I'm willing to vote for this resolution.