Waldenes wrote:Fellow ambassadors and delegates of the World Assembly; Initially our decision felt rather obvious. Why vote for a repeal against the rights of women to choose? But upon closer reading, the repeal makes some good points. It points out some flaws in the original proposal. That the original proposal allows for parents to decide is questionable. What if the minor is at health risk? Do the parents still get to decide?
While the language of this repeal proposal might indicate a desire to open up to some sort of compromise, this does not sound like an Anti-Choice proposal, especially given that it encourages the passage of an improved proposal. It is for this reason that after great consideration we have decided to vote for. Progress and improvement are good things, after all.
"Thank you for your support, ambassador, it is very appreciated."