To be clear, re-reading that, I mistyped. WALL deliberations are not public and there is in fact no way to independently confirm the claim I made other than by checking with a different WALL member. My apologies.
However that is, if you believe that I'm the villainous Illuminati behind the curtain and I'm giving a pass to Auralia for non-compliance (which in the light of new evidence, I'm reconsidering), then why does the TNP IFV talk about Auralian non-compliance?
And returning to real life, where I am not an Illuminati puppetmaster, no matter how hard, CCD tries to convince people of that, I will say that TNP does solicit input from GA regulars, especially when talking about GA author commendations. I'm not a fan of god-modded non-compliance, I made my views on that matter known.
Wallenburg wrote:Ummm...what am I supposed to do then? Multi for the sake of having another WA nation on my planet, for the sake of your "realism"?
Your RP requires there to be other people playing in it? You can have a lore in which there are other nations without actually creating them or having other people behind them. But more broadly, it doesn't make sense to be a role play WA member in a world (assuming no space travel) without other WA members. You don't get any protections dealing with international issues, you don't get any trade membership benefits, no collective action problem solving, etc. What you get are just costs from following WA resolutions.
In a sensible roleplay environment, not only would a MT nation on a planet with no other nations have never heard of the WA, they would never have joined it. If you think that's unrealistic, I have a Galactic Assembly for you to join.