Drystar wrote:I still find clause 2 and 3.b problematic. You’ve a must statement for a member nation, but no penalty if they don’t. And 3.b has no repercussions for the agency if it does divulge the information. Is there other resolutions that tie in to those to offer recourse?
Clause 3.d then requires that the IHACC present evidence of non-compliance to the WACC for investigation. The IAO inGAR 440 would then assess the necessity and optimal size of, and impose, fines on the non-compliant nation. There would probably also be sanctions placed on the non-compliant nation by other member nations.
As for 3.b, WA committees are by default assumed to be infallible.