Kenmoria wrote:“In 1b, I believe the clause would flow better were there to be added the word ‘exist’ after ‘none’.”
"This has been fixed"
Advertisement
by Marxist Germany » Sat Mar 30, 2019 9:38 am
Kenmoria wrote:“In 1b, I believe the clause would flow better were there to be added the word ‘exist’ after ‘none’.”
by Kenmoria » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:19 am
by Marxist Germany » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:20 am
Kenmoria wrote:“I’m unsure exactly what scenarios you are envisioning that would be prohibited under clause 2b. Why would any business harm its customers, given those will be the ones giving them a source of income?”
by Kenmoria » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:28 am
“I think then it makes more sense for the clause to read ‘any individual’, since it would make more sense for a business to target its competitors’ user base. Also, perhaps restrict the ability of governments, as well as businesses, to use spyware?”
by Marxist Germany » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:54 am
Kenmoria wrote:“I think then it makes more sense for the clause to read ‘any individual’, since it would make more sense for a business to target its competitors’ user base. Also, perhaps restrict the ability of governments, as well as businesses, to use spyware?”Marxist Germany wrote:"Spyware and ransomware programmes come up to mind"
by Marxist Germany » Wed Apr 03, 2019 9:58 am
by Kenmoria » Wed Apr 03, 2019 10:02 am
by Araraukar » Thu Apr 04, 2019 6:54 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Marxist Germany » Thu Apr 04, 2019 8:46 am
Araraukar wrote:OOC: Have you made sure that this doesn't run afoul of the network defence (I forget exact name, but fairly sure those words were in the title) resolution, or any resolution in existence that requires people's data to be kept for the various purposes of the resolutions in existence?
by Marxist Germany » Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:42 am
by Widowed Land » Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:23 pm
Marxist Germany wrote:Encourages member states to enact stricter laws to protect their citizens' privacy from businesses.
by Marxist Germany » Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:25 pm
by Widowed Land » Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:32 pm
by Marxist Germany » Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:34 pm
Widowed Land wrote:"If one wishes to enact such laws, they'll do it without someone else's encouragement. And we can simply ratify(accept or whatever) your resolution. If your resolution doesn't fit standards you wish to implement, then why should we waste our time on approving it if the problem won't be solved fully and we'd have to enact extra laws?"
by Widowed Land » Sat Apr 06, 2019 4:42 pm
by Marxist Germany » Sun Apr 07, 2019 2:57 am
Widowed Land wrote:"Correct me if I am wrong ambassador, but you literally recited the whole point of resolution in clause 5, with one sentence. I just don't get the reason of its existence"
by Kenmoria » Sun Apr 07, 2019 12:12 pm
Marxist Germany wrote:OOC:This has been submitted
by Aureumterra » Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:40 pm
by Marxist Germany » Mon Apr 08, 2019 2:56 pm
Aureumterra wrote:You’re welcome for the last approval, this is a good proposal
by Uan aa Boa » Wed Apr 10, 2019 8:46 am
by Marxist Germany » Wed Apr 10, 2019 8:56 am
Uan aa Boa wrote:Nearly all the measures in the proposal apply solely to businesses, a term that isn't defined in the text. This creates a lot of vagueness about what is and isn't a business and doesn't regulate data processing by government agencies, individuals, NGOs and (presumably) non-profits. That means that any business can create a non-profit subsidiary or appoint an individual to process data for them, thereby completely bypassing the regulations.
by Separatist Peoples » Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:15 am
Marxist Germany wrote:Uan aa Boa wrote:Nearly all the measures in the proposal apply solely to businesses, a term that isn't defined in the text. This creates a lot of vagueness about what is and isn't a business and doesn't regulate data processing by government agencies, individuals, NGOs and (presumably) non-profits. That means that any business can create a non-profit subsidiary or appoint an individual to process data for them, thereby completely bypassing the regulations.
A business is a commonly used word, here's a definition you can find on Google:
business
/ˈbɪznəs/
noun
1.
a person's regular occupation, profession, or trade.
"experts who typically conduct their business over the Internet"
synonyms: work, line of work, line, occupation, profession, career, employment, job, day job, position, pursuit, vocation, calling, field, sphere, walk of life, trade, craft; More
2.
commercial activity.
"firms who want to do business with Japan"
synonyms: trade, trading, commerce, buying and selling, dealing, traffic, trafficking, marketing, merchandising, bargaining;
by Kenmoria » Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:35 am
Marxist Germany wrote:Uan aa Boa wrote:Nearly all the measures in the proposal apply solely to businesses, a term that isn't defined in the text. This creates a lot of vagueness about what is and isn't a business and doesn't regulate data processing by government agencies, individuals, NGOs and (presumably) non-profits. That means that any business can create a non-profit subsidiary or appoint an individual to process data for them, thereby completely bypassing the regulations.
A business is a commonly used word, here's a definition you can find on Google:
business
/ˈbɪznəs/
noun
1.
a person's regular occupation, profession, or trade.
"experts who typically conduct their business over the Internet"
synonyms: work, line of work, line, occupation, profession, career, employment, job, day job, position, pursuit, vocation, calling, field, sphere, walk of life, trade, craft; More
2.
commercial activity.
"firms who want to do business with Japan"
synonyms: trade, trading, commerce, buying and selling, dealing, traffic, trafficking, marketing, merchandising, bargaining;
by Marxist Germany » Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:44 am
Kenmoria wrote:Marxist Germany wrote:A business is a commonly used word, here's a definition you can find on Google:
business
/ˈbɪznəs/
noun
1.
a person's regular occupation, profession, or trade.
"experts who typically conduct their business over the Internet"
synonyms: work, line of work, line, occupation, profession, career, employment, job, day job, position, pursuit, vocation, calling, field, sphere, walk of life, trade, craft; More
2.
commercial activity.
"firms who want to do business with Japan"
synonyms: trade, trading, commerce, buying and selling, dealing, traffic, trafficking, marketing, merchandising, bargaining;
(OOC: Google’s automatic definitions alone have seven different meanings, granted that some of them are implausible like a group of ferrets. However, a business has a more specialised set of definitions in legal contexts. It can be used solely to refer to the limited liability arrangements, and the business as an entity distinct from a natural person. Alternatively, it could be used to refer to any of a: sole trader, partnership, PLC, limited liability company, state-run corporation, or a few other things.)
by Marxist Germany » Wed Apr 10, 2019 1:05 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement