by Canterac » Sun Feb 17, 2019 8:39 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Sun Feb 17, 2019 10:06 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Cedoria » Sun Feb 17, 2019 6:30 pm
by Sheboyganite Union » Sun Feb 17, 2019 6:47 pm
by Borovan3 » Sun Feb 17, 2019 7:33 pm
Sheboyganite Union wrote:No i say we pass this and end ages of Antifa persecutions and for violation of freedom of speech for all fascist regions as it is guranteed by the WA
by Bedetopia » Sun Feb 17, 2019 10:07 pm
by LiberNovusAmericae » Sun Feb 17, 2019 10:12 pm
by Lyrical International Brigade » Sun Feb 17, 2019 11:37 pm
Bedetopia wrote:I feel like directly saying "alt-left" and "alt-right" goes against rule 4a, though GenSec allowed it. What am I missing?
by Lord Dominator » Mon Feb 18, 2019 12:43 am
by Bedetopia » Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:44 am
Lord Dominator wrote:I'm confused on the chatter about GenSec in a SC thread...
Lyrical International Brigade wrote:Bedetopia wrote:I feel like directly saying "alt-left" and "alt-right" goes against rule 4a, though GenSec allowed it. What am I missing?
Speaking for myself only, "alt-right" is a generic enough descriptor that I don't count it as a specific RL reference (you can understand its basics without necessarily referring to specific people, e.g.); while "alt-left" is a figment of the imaginations of...and therefore cannot be an RL reference.
-- 1/6 GenSec
by Qwabour Harbour » Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:53 am
by Lord Dominator » Mon Feb 18, 2019 9:23 am
by Kranostav » Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:28 pm
by Pogorevka » Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:37 pm
by Lyrical International Brigade » Mon Feb 18, 2019 3:50 pm
Moderators?
Lyrical International Brigade wrote:
Speaking for myself only, "alt-right" is a generic enough descriptor that I don't count it as a specific RL reference (you can understand its basics without necessarily referring to specific people, e.g.); while "alt-left" is a figment of the imaginations of...and therefore cannot be an RL reference.
-- 1/6 GenSec
Feels like a double standard if you ask me.
by Nuclear Wastelands » Mon Feb 18, 2019 3:55 pm
by Ithreland » Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:00 pm
Lyrical International Brigade wrote:Bedetopia wrote:I feel like directly saying "alt-left" and "alt-right" goes against rule 4a, though GenSec allowed it. What am I missing?
Speaking for myself only, "alt-right" is a generic enough descriptor that I don't count it as a specific RL reference (you can understand its basics without necessarily referring to specific people, e.g.); while "alt-left" is a figment of the imaginations of...and therefore cannot be an RL reference.
-- 1/6 GenSec
by Ransium » Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:27 pm
by Bedetopia » Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:40 am
by Ransium » Tue Feb 19, 2019 10:04 am
by The Communist Union of B » Tue Feb 19, 2019 10:12 am
The Communist Union of B doesn’t represent my personal views, beliefs, or political ideology.
The C.U.B National News: The government is currently going through some factbook remodeling containing all the weapons the C.U.B uses and a wiki-style factbook.
I’m a centrist republican and don’t actually support socialism or communism like my nation suggests. Support your local law enforcement! #thinblueline
Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 1.0
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.64Discord: GoldenEcho13#8735
Reddit: u/GoldenEcho13I do use Economic and Rank NS Stats, not nation classification levels. http://nseconomy.thirdgeek.com/?nation=The+Communist+Union+of+B
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement