NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] International Criminal Protocol

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Nevertopia
Minister
 
Posts: 3159
Founded: May 27, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Nevertopia » Fri Jul 17, 2020 11:04 pm

That protective confinement be be utilized only when there exists a clear and present danger to holding the prisoner within the general prison area,

Does this typo invalid the legislature at all?
So the CCP won't let me be or let me be me so let me see, they tried to shut me down on CBC but it feels so empty without me.
Communism has failed every time its been tried.
Civilization Index: Class 9.28
Tier 7: Stellar Settler | Level 7: Wonderful Wizard | Type 7: Astro Ambassador
This nation's overview is the primary canon. For more information use NS stats.
Black Lives Matter

User avatar
Tinfect
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5235
Founded: Jul 04, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tinfect » Fri Jul 17, 2020 11:06 pm

Nevertopia wrote:That protective confinement be be utilized only when there exists a clear and present danger to holding the prisoner within the general prison area,

Does this typo invalid the legislature at all?


OOC:
No.
Raslin Seretis, Imperial Diplomatic Envoy, He/Him
Tolarn Feren, Civil Oversight Representative, He/Him
Jasot Rehlan, Military Oversight Representative, She/Her


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM.

Imperium Central News Network: EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL CITIZENS ARE TO PROCEED TO EVACUATION SITES IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL FURTHER SUBSPACE SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ARE TO BE DISABLED IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS ARE ACCESS PROHIBITED BY STANDARD/BLACKOUT [Error: Format Unrecognized] | Indomitable Bastard #283
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Owarinai
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Jul 13, 2020
Ex-Nation

International Criminal Protocol

Postby Owarinai » Fri Jul 17, 2020 11:40 pm

I would love for this to pass, but unfortunately it seems as though it’ll be a close one. Regardless of the outcome, The People’s Republic of Owarinai will fully support this.

User avatar
Laeden
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: Apr 11, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Laeden » Sat Jul 18, 2020 2:37 am

The prohibition on punitive confinement is ludicrous, and because of this, I'm voting against.

User avatar
Heavens Reach
Diplomat
 
Posts: 691
Founded: May 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Heavens Reach » Sat Jul 18, 2020 7:03 am

We are confused by the views of several ambassadors who believe that this proposal, if brought to resolution, would effectively block legislation disclaiming member nations of the ability to practice capital punishment. A proposal which eliminates capital punishment would not in any way create a contradiction with this proposal as it is presently written: it would simply render certain clauses irrelevant. It is perfectly possible to require that those facing execution be afforded certain rights and to not allow executions to be performed at all. Both are simultaneously true when the latter mandate is ascribed -- it simply makes the former mandate unnecessary and legally superfluous (but leaves intact its effect).

User avatar
Tinfect
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5235
Founded: Jul 04, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tinfect » Sat Jul 18, 2020 7:23 am

Heavens Reach wrote:We are confused by the views of several ambassadors who believe that this proposal, if brought to resolution, would effectively block legislation disclaiming member nations of the ability to practice capital punishment. A proposal which eliminates capital punishment would not in any way create a contradiction with this proposal as it is presently written: it would simply render certain clauses irrelevant. It is perfectly possible to require that those facing execution be afforded certain rights and to not allow executions to be performed at all. Both are simultaneously true when the latter mandate is ascribed -- it simply makes the former mandate unnecessary and legally superfluous (but leaves intact its effect).


OOC:
Please read the proposal.
Reserves to Member-States the right to determine the legality of capital punishment within their jurisdiction,
Raslin Seretis, Imperial Diplomatic Envoy, He/Him
Tolarn Feren, Civil Oversight Representative, He/Him
Jasot Rehlan, Military Oversight Representative, She/Her


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM.

Imperium Central News Network: EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL CITIZENS ARE TO PROCEED TO EVACUATION SITES IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL FURTHER SUBSPACE SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ARE TO BE DISABLED IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS ARE ACCESS PROHIBITED BY STANDARD/BLACKOUT [Error: Format Unrecognized] | Indomitable Bastard #283
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Heavens Reach
Diplomat
 
Posts: 691
Founded: May 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Heavens Reach » Sat Jul 18, 2020 7:31 am

Tinfect wrote:
Heavens Reach wrote:We are confused by the views of several ambassadors who believe that this proposal, if brought to resolution, would effectively block legislation disclaiming member nations of the ability to practice capital punishment. A proposal which eliminates capital punishment would not in any way create a contradiction with this proposal as it is presently written: it would simply render certain clauses irrelevant. It is perfectly possible to require that those facing execution be afforded certain rights and to not allow executions to be performed at all. Both are simultaneously true when the latter mandate is ascribed -- it simply makes the former mandate unnecessary and legally superfluous (but leaves intact its effect).


OOC:
Please read the proposal.
Reserves to Member-States the right to determine the legality of capital punishment within their jurisdiction,


OOC: Fair enough.

IC: Upon revisiting the proposal, and understanding that this is, in fact, a bad faith attempt to reduce access to human rights, rather than to expand them, we will submit a vote of against in the matter of International Criminal Protocol

User avatar
Apollo 19
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Jun 10, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Apollo 19 » Sat Jul 18, 2020 10:24 am

Don’t tell me how to run my Criminal Justice System. This bill is getting to invasive on the Sovereign Rights of my Nation. I am vehemently opposed to this resolution as is the rest of Apollo 19.

User avatar
Bairamcea
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Feb 08, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Bairamcea » Sat Jul 18, 2020 11:46 am

I have issues regarding the "Civil Rights" of this legislation. It claims to want to "immediately prevent any further abuses of criminal justice systems," yet it ignores a huge issue in many criminal justice systems. This bill prohibits "The practice of forced prisoner labor," yet still allows Capital Punishment. I believe that if we truly want a bill that is a champion for the civil rights of the accused than we must eliminate capital punishment as a whole. While this bill doesn't force the use of capital punishment, "Reserves to Member-States the right to determine the legality of capital punishment within their jurisdiction," this bill does little to improve the Civil Rights for those incarcerated around the world. I find this piece of legislation to be misguided and ill advised. I believe that the hypocrisy demonstrated in this bill will, in return, cause only more unethical behavior to be demonstrated inside Member's Justice systems.

I have yet to cast my vote on this piece of legislation. I look forward to hearing your response before casting my vote.

With Respect,
Bairamcea WA delegate representing Rantariztan

User avatar
Zironie
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Jun 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Zironie » Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:07 pm

I have a question. My nation has no prisons, and allows capital and corporal punishment. Would this getting passed remove or change those policies?

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:10 pm

Zironie wrote:I have a question. My nation has no prisons, and allows capital and corporal punishment. Would this getting passed remove or change those policies?


"Extant law already prevents executions from being carried out, ambassador."

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Wealthatonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 212
Founded: Sep 19, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Wealthatonia » Sat Jul 18, 2020 8:14 pm

Does this resolution apply to those of us without a police force and rely on private superheroes and Private Law enforcement to handle the laws?
Wealthatonian Ambassador JP Rockefeller

"Fine dining, grand buffets, and money used as napkins as far as the eye can see.

Gold-topped everything for Wealthatonia" what New Scaiva and Horshenwurst thinks the average meal is like in our nation

_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Signature!

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22872
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Sat Jul 18, 2020 10:32 pm

Wealthatonia wrote:Does this resolution apply to those of us without a police force and rely on private superheroes and Private Law enforcement to handle the laws?

Yes.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Sun Jul 19, 2020 1:07 pm

The solitary confinement ban is a dealbreaker for us. As such, we are voting against.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Klauswanti
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jul 17, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Klauswanti » Sun Jul 19, 2020 1:10 pm

Isolation and the use of it is necessary to rehabilitate prisoners. We cannot accept this left-radical bill.

User avatar
The Grand Imperial Reich
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Apr 10, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grand Imperial Reich » Sun Jul 19, 2020 2:18 pm

Yeah, banning solitary is kinda uncool. Against.
She/Her

User avatar
Astrobolt
Diplomat
 
Posts: 508
Founded: Jul 30, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Astrobolt » Sun Jul 19, 2020 2:21 pm

The Grand Imperial Reich wrote:Yeah, banning solitary is kinda uncool. Against.


"What is wrong with banning solitary confinement? Its a practice that is akin to a form of torture."
Delegate of the 10000 Islands
Ambassador to the WA: Mr. Reede Tappe

TITO Tactical Officer


For a detailed list of positions, and other things of note, click here.

User avatar
The Grand Imperial Reich
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Apr 10, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grand Imperial Reich » Sun Jul 19, 2020 3:06 pm

Astrobolt wrote:
The Grand Imperial Reich wrote:Yeah, banning solitary is kinda uncool. Against.


"What is wrong with banning solitary confinement? Its a practice that is akin to a form of torture."

It's just kinda lame really.
She/Her

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Sun Jul 19, 2020 3:08 pm

The Grand Imperial Reich wrote:
Astrobolt wrote:
"What is wrong with banning solitary confinement? Its a practice that is akin to a form of torture."

It's just kinda lame really.

"Ah, yes. Torture is cool, banning torture is lame. Very convincing."

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Sun Jul 19, 2020 3:14 pm

Astrobolt wrote:
The Grand Imperial Reich wrote:Yeah, banning solitary is kinda uncool. Against.


"What is wrong with banning solitary confinement? Its a practice that is akin to a form of torture."

If the solitary confinement is longer than a few days, extending to weeks and months then yes it arguably is torture. However, interpreting the text in the proposal as it is written, it bans all solitary confinement, even for a matter of hours or days. Short term solitary isn't torture.

If it banned solitary confinement that was longer than a week then yes, I'd support it, but it's the fact that even short-term solitary is going to be banned too that makes me vote against.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Bounapartia
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Apr 30, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Bounapartia » Sun Jul 19, 2020 3:40 pm

The delegation of Bounapartia is against this resolution. Bounapartia believes in the use of punitive confinement as an effective way to punish rowdy prisoners, albeit for a few days at most. The outright ban is excessive and Bounapartia will therefore be opposed to this resolution.

User avatar
Meone
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jul 11, 2020
Ex-Nation

Just making sure

Postby Meone » Sun Jul 19, 2020 5:00 pm

This request is quite unclear , first does this mean community service is banned? And what can be considered punitive confinement anyways? Are you requesting for us to ban prisons?

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22872
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Sun Jul 19, 2020 5:57 pm

The New California Republic wrote:
Astrobolt wrote:
"What is wrong with banning solitary confinement? Its a practice that is akin to a form of torture."

If the solitary confinement is longer than a few days, extending to weeks and months then yes it arguably is torture. However, interpreting the text in the proposal as it is written, it bans all solitary confinement, even for a matter of hours or days. Short term solitary isn't torture.

Yes, it is.
Meone wrote:This request is quite unclear , first does this mean community service is banned? And what can be considered punitive confinement anyways? Are you requesting for us to ban prisons?

"Punitive confinement" is defined in the resolution. It doesn't include all prisons. Please read the resolution.
Last edited by Wallenburg on Sun Jul 19, 2020 5:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Wealthatonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 212
Founded: Sep 19, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Wealthatonia » Sun Jul 19, 2020 6:57 pm

Wallenburg wrote:
Wealthatonia wrote:Does this resolution apply to those of us without a police force and rely on private superheroes and Private Law enforcement to handle the laws?

Yes.


We will not follow this resolution. It's a violation of our national principals of nothing publically funded.
Wealthatonian Ambassador JP Rockefeller

"Fine dining, grand buffets, and money used as napkins as far as the eye can see.

Gold-topped everything for Wealthatonia" what New Scaiva and Horshenwurst thinks the average meal is like in our nation

_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Signature!

User avatar
Tinfect
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5235
Founded: Jul 04, 2014
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tinfect » Sun Jul 19, 2020 6:59 pm

Wealthatonia wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:Yes.


We will not follow this resolution. It's a violation of our national principals of nothing publically funded.


OOC:
Nothing in this proposal exempts private entities or requires that prisons be funded publicly. Please read the proposal.
Last edited by Tinfect on Sun Jul 19, 2020 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Raslin Seretis, Imperial Diplomatic Envoy, He/Him
Tolarn Feren, Civil Oversight Representative, He/Him
Jasot Rehlan, Military Oversight Representative, She/Her


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM.

Imperium Central News Network: EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL CITIZENS ARE TO PROCEED TO EVACUATION SITES IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL FURTHER SUBSPACE SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ARE TO BE DISABLED IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS ARE ACCESS PROHIBITED BY STANDARD/BLACKOUT [Error: Format Unrecognized] | Indomitable Bastard #283
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads