Draganisia wrote:I am just going to leave this here:
Consider it an Official Announcement from the NPO Pacific government:
What's your government position in the NPO, Draganisia?
Advertisement
by Jar Wattinree » Sat Dec 01, 2018 4:00 pm
by Prydania » Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:20 pm
Draganisia wrote:I am just going to leave this here:
Consider it an Official Announcement from the NPO Pacific government:
In this modern day and age, Condemns are toothless things for a region. They have lost their power to brand and mark; now they are just another Commend, albeit of a different color palette.
Do not let it discourage you comrades, but fill you with pride. The Pacific is adopting a policy of honesty in her interactions with other regions, and this Condemnation is but the honest efforts of a mindless enemy. They have shown their colors; we shall do the opposite, proudly waving the Condemnation in their face.
For we are the only Game Created Region to be Condemned. Not only that but twice Condemned! Whatever our failings, whatever our faults or mistakes, take pride regardless, for know that one day our fortunes will change for the better.
From Myrth, an honorable Pacifican and former Senator in ages gone by:
Fellow Pacificans! You may have noticed that there is a resolution at vote in the WA Security Council to condemn us. Most of you are probably thinking you should vote against. Well, you would be wrong. It may seem a little odd to vote for a resolution that seeks to condemn us, but with this resolution our enemies have handed us the most perfect piece of propaganda we could have asked for.
Those who would seek to see us destroyed, indeed the wording of the resolution itself states they hope "for the destruction of the New Pacific Order", make overtures of peace and promises of reconciliation should we merely accede to their demands of us. By supporting and voting for this resolution, they show their true colours and give us the evidence in black and white of their hypocrisy. By signing their names to this resolution, and giving us a nice shiny badge on our regional homepage, they set in stone their hypocrisy for all to see.
Let those who are serious about peace and reconciliation come to us with honest intentions. Let those who seek to destroy us and our great region expose themselves for what they really are!
Vote FOR Condemning the Pacific! Vote FOR the unmasking of those who seek to do us harm! Hail Pacifica! FOR THE EMPEROR!
I proudly endorse Comrade Myrth's suggestion: vote For the Condemn, and wear it with pride. And vote according to your conscience.
And for our true enemies who brought up this resolution this is what you get for Awakening The Dragons Of The Pacific !!!
by The Gilded Star » Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:43 pm
by Consular » Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:04 pm
Byzconia wrote:Cormactopia Prime wrote:Defenders have virtually nothing to do with this...
Disagree. Defenders are the self-appointed "defenders" (see?) against aggressive regions and players. Therefore, reasonably, they should see this as a message to mobilize and liberate these regions. If not, then this whole thing is literally useless.
by Byzconia » Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:07 pm
Consular wrote:Byzconia wrote:
Disagree. Defenders are the self-appointed "defenders" (see?) against aggressive regions and players. Therefore, reasonably, they should see this as a message to mobilize and liberate these regions. If not, then this whole thing is literally useless.
Defenders defend against invasion. Is someone being invaded right now?
It's best we don't get defending involved in politics.
United Provinces of Atlantica wrote:As a Lazarene, I would've preferred the NPO's aggression against Lazarus through Stujenske/Kowassati and its manipulation of both sides in the Civil War to have been mentioned, but this otherwise excellently well-written and sorely needed, so I fully support it. NPO delenda est.
by The Tri State Area and Maine » Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:13 pm
Byzconia wrote:Consular wrote:Defenders defend against invasion. Is someone being invaded right now?
It's best we don't get defending involved in politics.
I've seen members of both Lazarus and Osiris complaining about the NPO invading their regions.
In fact, the first response to the OP was such a post:United Provinces of Atlantica wrote:As a Lazarene, I would've preferred the NPO's aggression against Lazarus through Stujenske/Kowassati and its manipulation of both sides in the Civil War to have been mentioned, but this otherwise excellently well-written and sorely needed, so I fully support it. NPO delenda est.
by Byzconia » Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:20 pm
by Galiantus III » Sat Dec 01, 2018 7:37 pm
Draganisia wrote:I am just going to leave this here:
Consider it an Official Announcement from the NPO Pacific government:
In this modern day and age, Condemns are toothless things for a region. They have lost their power to brand and mark; now they are just another Commend, albeit of a different color palette.
Do not let it discourage you comrades, but fill you with pride. The Pacific is adopting a policy of honesty in her interactions with other regions, and this Condemnation is but the honest efforts of a mindless enemy. They have shown their colors; we shall do the opposite, proudly waving the Condemnation in their face.
For we are the only Game Created Region to be Condemned. Not only that but twice Condemned! Whatever our failings, whatever our faults or mistakes, take pride regardless, for know that one day our fortunes will change for the better.
From Myrth, an honorable Pacifican and former Senator in ages gone by:
Fellow Pacificans! You may have noticed that there is a resolution at vote in the WA Security Council to condemn us. Most of you are probably thinking you should vote against. Well, you would be wrong. It may seem a little odd to vote for a resolution that seeks to condemn us, but with this resolution our enemies have handed us the most perfect piece of propaganda we could have asked for.
Those who would seek to see us destroyed, indeed the wording of the resolution itself states they hope "for the destruction of the New Pacific Order", make overtures of peace and promises of reconciliation should we merely accede to their demands of us. By supporting and voting for this resolution, they show their true colours and give us the evidence in black and white of their hypocrisy. By signing their names to this resolution, and giving us a nice shiny badge on our regional homepage, they set in stone their hypocrisy for all to see.
Let those who are serious about peace and reconciliation come to us with honest intentions. Let those who seek to destroy us and our great region expose themselves for what they really are!
Vote FOR Condemning the Pacific! Vote FOR the unmasking of those who seek to do us harm! Hail Pacifica! FOR THE EMPEROR!
I proudly endorse Comrade Myrth's suggestion: vote For the Condemn, and wear it with pride. And vote according to your conscience.
And for our true enemies who brought up this resolution this is what you get for Awakening The Dragons Of The Pacific !!!
Frisbeeteria wrote:For some reason I have a mental image of a dolphin, trying to organize a new pod of his fellow dolphins to change the course of a nuclear sub. It's entertaining, I'll give ya that.
Ballotonia wrote:Testing is for sissies. The actual test is to see how many people complain when any change is made ;)
by New Bremerton » Sun Dec 02, 2018 12:03 am
by Lord Dominator » Sun Dec 02, 2018 12:17 am
New Bremerton wrote:Why not liberate The Pacific instead of just condemning the NPO?
by Christ Triumphant » Sun Dec 02, 2018 5:42 am
Atsvea wrote:I don't know if there's a more proper place find out, so I'll ask it here
What's francoism? All I know is that it involves a lot of hailing.
by The Tri State Area and Maine » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:50 am
by Doing it Rightland » Sun Dec 02, 2018 12:49 pm
The Tri State Area and Maine wrote:Byzconia wrote:
How so?
Subversion is going undercover in a region with the intent of taking it over or achieving political aims in a region. While raiding is also about taking over regions (with the use of subversion sometimes), it's generally not for a political cause, and is more about messing with the region than actually achieving something. Another difference being that those who raid attack inactive, dead regions usually, and they don't raid regions they are friendly with. Defenders wouldn't care because subversion isn't raiding, regardless of how similar it is.
by Byzconia » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:10 pm
The Tri State Area and Maine wrote:Byzconia wrote:
How so?
Subversion is going undercover in a region with the intent of taking it over or achieving political aims in a region. While raiding is also about taking over regions (with the use of subversion sometimes), it's generally not for a political cause, and is more about messing with the region than actually achieving something. Another difference being that those who raid attack inactive, dead regions usually, and they don't raid regions they are friendly with. Defenders wouldn't care because subversion isn't raiding, regardless of how similar it is.
by Fauxia » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:15 pm
Doing it Rightland wrote:The Tri State Area and Maine wrote:Subversion is going undercover in a region with the intent of taking it over or achieving political aims in a region. While raiding is also about taking over regions (with the use of subversion sometimes), it's generally not for a political cause, and is more about messing with the region than actually achieving something. Another difference being that those who raid attack inactive, dead regions usually, and they don't raid regions they are friendly with. Defenders wouldn't care because subversion isn't raiding, regardless of how similar it is.
Well, I would disagree somewhat. Raiding can have a variety of motives, from reviving dead regions to messing with regions to causing political change. As such, some raids are not comparable to subversion, but others absolutely are. Case in point, the recent conflict in St. Abbadon was a raid to overthrow an existing government and install a new leader. That sounds a lot like the accused subversion by the NPO, with the only difference being it happening in broad daylight.
by Lord Dominator » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:19 pm
by Dragonisia » Mon Dec 03, 2018 12:41 am
by Pierconium » Mon Dec 03, 2018 2:41 am
by Visionary Union » Mon Dec 03, 2018 2:53 am
by Pierconium » Mon Dec 03, 2018 3:22 am
Visionary Union wrote:The hubris and lack of self reflection on the NPO side is amazing, borderline delusional.
by Pierconium » Mon Dec 03, 2018 3:46 am
by Yokiria » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:58 am
Pierconium wrote:Regardless, mob mentality continues to rule and the current vote is a foregone conclusion at this point. You had your chance and you blew it. Expecting meaningful change in the face of attack is foolish. The new leadership might still make efforts and provide it, but I personally think bullying the new kids isn't the way to get it done.
by Pierconium » Mon Dec 03, 2018 6:01 am
Yokiria wrote:Pierconium wrote:Regardless, mob mentality continues to rule and the current vote is a foregone conclusion at this point. You had your chance and you blew it. Expecting meaningful change in the face of attack is foolish. The new leadership might still make efforts and provide it, but I personally think bullying the new kids isn't the way to get it done.
Mob mentality implies that it is irrational. I would like to see your argument for this not being a rational response, and compare your argument to undoubtedly similar arguments you made while Emperor.
"You had your chance and you blew it" is certainly projection on your part, Pierconium.
Finally, facing due consequence for wide-ranging subversive actions does not qualify as "bullying kids".
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement