NATION

PASSWORD

[DEFEATED/DISCARDED] Lib. Federation Of Conservative Nations

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Quebecshire
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 55
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Quebecshire » Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:44 pm

Kavagrad wrote:Jumping back a second, if I may, Gagium has stated that the only open Fascist in FCN has been gone for a long time.

Irou 3 seems pretty open.

All I'm saying is, before you make those broad statements, have a quick check.

That should have no bearing on if a region deserves such a blatant and pathetic infringement upon its sovereignty.

For example, like the FCN, despite our region being widely opposed to both fascism and communism, they are allowed to reside if they abide by our laws and customs. They probably won't get too far, but we don't ban them on sight. And there should be nothing wrong with that.
Chief Consul Quebecshire of the Republic of The League of Conservative Nations
"Quebecshire has proven time and time again that he is perfectly capable of standing in front of a room, full of people who hate him and continuing to defend his views"
Chairman of the National Committee of Reconstruction (LCN), President (LCN), Vice-President (LCN), Secretary of Defense (LCN), Secretary of Public Relations (LCN), Director of Homeland Security (LCN), Chancellor of FORGE, FORGE Secretary of Public Relations.

User avatar
Cedoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5928
Founded: Feb 22, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Cedoria » Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:50 pm

Quebecshire wrote:
Kavagrad wrote:Jumping back a second, if I may, Gagium has stated that the only open Fascist in FCN has been gone for a long time.

Irou 3 seems pretty open.

All I'm saying is, before you make those broad statements, have a quick check.

That should have no bearing on if a region deserves such a blatant and pathetic infringement upon its sovereignty.

For example, like the FCN, despite our region being widely opposed to both fascism and communism, they are allowed to reside if they abide by our laws and customs. They probably won't get too far, but we don't ban them on sight. And there should be nothing wrong with that.


If your region's Discord isn't chock full to the brim with racial slurs, open advocacy of rate hate, homophobia, genocide and racially motivated killing, I think you'll be fine.
In real life I am a libertarian socialist/democratic socialist
★Comrade of the Commonwealth of Socialist States (CSS)★
Likes: Freedom of speech, Freedom of Expression, Direct Democracy, Worker Owned Cooperatives, Secularism, Anti-Theism, Freedom of civil disobediance, Libertarian Socialism, Social equity for minorities.

Dislikes: Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, Stalinism, Capitalism, American Exceptionalism, Most world leaders, Religious bigotry, Despots of virtually any kind, Imperialism, Putinism, Economic Inequality, Identity Politics, Fascism and assorted far-right movements.



Founding member of The Leftist Assembly

User avatar
Quebecshire
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 55
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Quebecshire » Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:51 pm

Cedoria wrote:
Quebecshire wrote:That should have no bearing on if a region deserves such a blatant and pathetic infringement upon its sovereignty.

For example, like the FCN, despite our region being widely opposed to both fascism and communism, they are allowed to reside if they abide by our laws and customs. They probably won't get too far, but we don't ban them on sight. And there should be nothing wrong with that.


If your region's Discord isn't chock full to the brim with racial slurs, open advocacy of rate hate, homophobia, genocide and racially motivated killing, I think you'll be fine.

Those are reasonably open to interpretation (with the exception of the last two), and can easily be mistaken for serious even if not intended so.
Chief Consul Quebecshire of the Republic of The League of Conservative Nations
"Quebecshire has proven time and time again that he is perfectly capable of standing in front of a room, full of people who hate him and continuing to defend his views"
Chairman of the National Committee of Reconstruction (LCN), President (LCN), Vice-President (LCN), Secretary of Defense (LCN), Secretary of Public Relations (LCN), Director of Homeland Security (LCN), Chancellor of FORGE, FORGE Secretary of Public Relations.

User avatar
Cedoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5928
Founded: Feb 22, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Cedoria » Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:57 pm

Quebecshire wrote:
Cedoria wrote:
If your region's Discord isn't chock full to the brim with racial slurs, open advocacy of rate hate, homophobia, genocide and racially motivated killing, I think you'll be fine.

Those are reasonably open to interpretation (with the exception of the last two), and can easily be mistaken for serious even if not intended so.


They're not open to interpretation in this case. If you haven't already, I'd suggest telegramming Kavagrad and getting him to show you the collected evidence. It's impossible to argue that there was anything other then clear and plain intention once you've seen those logs.
In real life I am a libertarian socialist/democratic socialist
★Comrade of the Commonwealth of Socialist States (CSS)★
Likes: Freedom of speech, Freedom of Expression, Direct Democracy, Worker Owned Cooperatives, Secularism, Anti-Theism, Freedom of civil disobediance, Libertarian Socialism, Social equity for minorities.

Dislikes: Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, Stalinism, Capitalism, American Exceptionalism, Most world leaders, Religious bigotry, Despots of virtually any kind, Imperialism, Putinism, Economic Inequality, Identity Politics, Fascism and assorted far-right movements.



Founding member of The Leftist Assembly

User avatar
Quebecshire
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 55
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Quebecshire » Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:59 pm

Cedoria wrote:
Quebecshire wrote:Those are reasonably open to interpretation (with the exception of the last two), and can easily be mistaken for serious even if not intended so.


They're not open to interpretation in this case. If you haven't already, I'd suggest telegramming Kavagrad and getting him to show you the collected evidence. It's impossible to argue that there was anything other then clear and plain intention once you've seen those logs.

He already did. And it leads me to believe that if the FCN wants to act immaturely they should be ignored and left to do so, we shouldn't go on a self righteous crusade to give them attention on the front page of NS through a liberation if they are truly such a problem.
Chief Consul Quebecshire of the Republic of The League of Conservative Nations
"Quebecshire has proven time and time again that he is perfectly capable of standing in front of a room, full of people who hate him and continuing to defend his views"
Chairman of the National Committee of Reconstruction (LCN), President (LCN), Vice-President (LCN), Secretary of Defense (LCN), Secretary of Public Relations (LCN), Director of Homeland Security (LCN), Chancellor of FORGE, FORGE Secretary of Public Relations.

User avatar
Cedoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5928
Founded: Feb 22, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Cedoria » Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:10 pm

Quebecshire wrote:
Cedoria wrote:
They're not open to interpretation in this case. If you haven't already, I'd suggest telegramming Kavagrad and getting him to show you the collected evidence. It's impossible to argue that there was anything other then clear and plain intention once you've seen those logs.

He already did. And it leads me to believe that if the FCN wants to act immaturely they should be ignored and left to do so, we shouldn't go on a self righteous crusade to give them attention on the front page of NS through a liberation if they are truly such a problem.

On the contrary, them being such a problem is precisely the reason a resolution is warranted in this case.


We are giving them attention, the bad kind, the wrong kind, the kind no person should want themselves and their name associated with, and rightly so, in this instance. I fail to see that as a counter-argument for the resolution.
Last edited by Cedoria on Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In real life I am a libertarian socialist/democratic socialist
★Comrade of the Commonwealth of Socialist States (CSS)★
Likes: Freedom of speech, Freedom of Expression, Direct Democracy, Worker Owned Cooperatives, Secularism, Anti-Theism, Freedom of civil disobediance, Libertarian Socialism, Social equity for minorities.

Dislikes: Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, Stalinism, Capitalism, American Exceptionalism, Most world leaders, Religious bigotry, Despots of virtually any kind, Imperialism, Putinism, Economic Inequality, Identity Politics, Fascism and assorted far-right movements.



Founding member of The Leftist Assembly

User avatar
Quebecshire
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 55
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Quebecshire » Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:23 pm

Cedoria wrote:
Quebecshire wrote:He already did. And it leads me to believe that if the FCN wants to act immaturely they should be ignored and left to do so, we shouldn't go on a self righteous crusade to give them attention on the front page of NS through a liberation if they are truly such a problem.

On the contrary, them being such a problem is precisely the reason a resolution is warranted in this case.


We are giving them attention, the bad kind, the wrong kind, the kind no person should want themselves and their name associated with, and rightly so, in this instance. I fail to see that as a counter-argument for the resolution.

You're just going to fuel people who are Anti-WA or don't mind that sort of immature "comedy" to support them.

Also, worth noting, isn't at least one of the people mentioned in the evidence banned from the FCN regardless?
Chief Consul Quebecshire of the Republic of The League of Conservative Nations
"Quebecshire has proven time and time again that he is perfectly capable of standing in front of a room, full of people who hate him and continuing to defend his views"
Chairman of the National Committee of Reconstruction (LCN), President (LCN), Vice-President (LCN), Secretary of Defense (LCN), Secretary of Public Relations (LCN), Director of Homeland Security (LCN), Chancellor of FORGE, FORGE Secretary of Public Relations.

User avatar
Cedoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5928
Founded: Feb 22, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Cedoria » Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:30 pm

Quebecshire wrote:
Cedoria wrote:On the contrary, them being such a problem is precisely the reason a resolution is warranted in this case.


We are giving them attention, the bad kind, the wrong kind, the kind no person should want themselves and their name associated with, and rightly so, in this instance. I fail to see that as a counter-argument for the resolution.

You're just going to fuel people who are Anti-WA or don't mind that sort of immature "comedy" to support them.

Also, worth noting, isn't at least one of the people mentioned in the evidence banned from the FCN regardless?


Some of those people include the region's Founder and other senior members, most of whom are still there. The person you speak of was not banned for any reasons related to the appalling material in FCN, and even Gagium has acknowledged. None of that changes


What other personal motives concerning a feud between FCN and some of its former members that may apply to some who support this resolution don't concerns me. What does concern me is the absolute cesspit that FCN's conversation consisted of for some time, and that many of those responsible are, contrary to disingenuous claims to the contrary, still very much active and participating members of FCN and this site. Those are the reasons why this resolution should be backed. If someone else is a former member and has a vendetta against FCN for unrelated reasons and wants to support the resolution, I don't really care. I doubt FCN does either, they're just bringing it up as a bit of disingenuous deflection.

Fuelling anti-WA people is an idiotic term. Anti-WA people will spread their nonsense regardless of what anyone does. Even if the entire WA stood stock still and never did anything for fear of annoying those opposed to it, they'd still oppose it.
Last edited by Cedoria on Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
In real life I am a libertarian socialist/democratic socialist
★Comrade of the Commonwealth of Socialist States (CSS)★
Likes: Freedom of speech, Freedom of Expression, Direct Democracy, Worker Owned Cooperatives, Secularism, Anti-Theism, Freedom of civil disobediance, Libertarian Socialism, Social equity for minorities.

Dislikes: Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, Stalinism, Capitalism, American Exceptionalism, Most world leaders, Religious bigotry, Despots of virtually any kind, Imperialism, Putinism, Economic Inequality, Identity Politics, Fascism and assorted far-right movements.



Founding member of The Leftist Assembly

User avatar
Quebecshire
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 55
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Quebecshire » Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:46 pm

Cedoria wrote:
Quebecshire wrote:You're just going to fuel people who are Anti-WA or don't mind that sort of immature "comedy" to support them.

Also, worth noting, isn't at least one of the people mentioned in the evidence banned from the FCN regardless?


Some of those people include the region's Founder and other senior members, most of whom are still there. The person you speak of was not banned for any reasons related to the appalling material in FCN, and even Gagium has acknowledged. None of that changes


What other personal motives concerning a feud between FCN and some of its former members that may apply to some who support this resolution don't concerns me. What does concern me is the absolute cesspit that FCN's conversation consisted of for some time, and that many of those responsible are, contrary to disingenuous claims to the contrary, still very much active and participating members of FCN and this site. Those are the reasons why this resolution should be backed. If someone else is a former member and has a vendetta against FCN for unrelated reasons and wants to support the resolution, I don't really care. I doubt FCN does either, they're just bringing it up as a bit of disingenuous deflection.

Fuelling anti-WA people is an idiotic term. Anti-WA people will spread their nonsense regardless of what anyone does. Even if the entire WA stood stock still and never did anything for fear of annoying those opposed to it, they'd still oppose it.

"Anti-WA people will spread their nonsense regardless of what anyone does."

Every time the WA does something stupid where it targets an innocent region, makes a blunder, or wastes time, or further faults what it should server as, it makes those comments less nonsensical.
Chief Consul Quebecshire of the Republic of The League of Conservative Nations
"Quebecshire has proven time and time again that he is perfectly capable of standing in front of a room, full of people who hate him and continuing to defend his views"
Chairman of the National Committee of Reconstruction (LCN), President (LCN), Vice-President (LCN), Secretary of Defense (LCN), Secretary of Public Relations (LCN), Director of Homeland Security (LCN), Chancellor of FORGE, FORGE Secretary of Public Relations.

User avatar
Spode Humbled Minions
Attaché
 
Posts: 79
Founded: May 13, 2016
New York Times Democracy

Postby Spode Humbled Minions » Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:47 pm

Being a communist from a conservative region that has already had to deal with this garbage, I'd like to ask-

Is it okay to ignore the context that this bill is in? I mean, it's some no-name shady as hell puppet that posted it after being founded about four days ago. It's pretty clear that it's a smear by the UCS, a break off faction of the FCN, and it doesn't reflect well on the UCS's discord that after they've made this bureaucratic push on the FCN and now on its discord, they've either deleted their post history or made it completely impossible to check their channels as a newcomer.
Makes you wonder.

Also, I can vouch for Gagium's character, that's not something I can do for the... certain people (COUGH COUGH) who may or may not have been the puppeteers behind this bill. Indeed, it's very interesting that "Andrew Breitbart" is a Discord account used by none other than San Carlos Islands.

Why are we here to liberate the region that hosted this person rather than the region that San Carlos (at least in part) runs? Oh yeah, because that's the UCS. ;)
Anyhow, if you've just shown up to this party and you get a whole bunch of screenshots with some definitely racist comments, it would be easy to say that this is a quick and easy liberation.

But that would just skip like 75% of the context!

User avatar
Cedoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5928
Founded: Feb 22, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Cedoria » Tue Oct 02, 2018 8:13 pm

Spode Humbled Minions wrote:Being a communist from a conservative region that has already had to deal with this garbage, I'd like to ask-

Is it okay to ignore the context that this bill is in? I mean, it's some no-name shady as hell puppet that posted it after being founded about four days ago. It's pretty clear that it's a smear by the UCS, a break off faction of the FCN, and it doesn't reflect well on the UCS's discord that after they've made this bureaucratic push on the FCN and now on its discord, they've either deleted their post history or made it completely impossible to check their channels as a newcomer.
Makes you wonder.

Also, I can vouch for Gagium's character, that's not something I can do for the... certain people (COUGH COUGH) who may or may not have been the puppeteers behind this bill. Indeed, it's very interesting that "Andrew Breitbart" is a Discord account used by none other than San Carlos Islands.

Why are we here to liberate the region that hosted this person rather than the region that San Carlos (at least in part) runs? Oh yeah, because that's the UCS. ;)
Anyhow, if you've just shown up to this party and you get a whole bunch of screenshots with some definitely racist comments, it would be easy to say that this is a quick and easy liberation.

But that would just skip like 75% of the context!


None of which is even remotely relevant to the fact that FCN is indeed still responsible for exactly the things the Resolution accuses them of.

If you have evidence that UCS is responsible for same, then please, share it, and I for one would adamantly favour a similar resolution in future.
But I'm guessing you don't, and even if you do and that puts UCS on a future Resolution, it STILL doesn't justify any of the apologetics and intellectual gymnastics that FCN and co are using now to deflect from some of the appalling behavior.

Quebecshire wrote:
Cedoria wrote:
Some of those people include the region's Founder and other senior members, most of whom are still there. The person you speak of was not banned for any reasons related to the appalling material in FCN, and even Gagium has acknowledged. None of that changes


What other personal motives concerning a feud between FCN and some of its former members that may apply to some who support this resolution don't concerns me. What does concern me is the absolute cesspit that FCN's conversation consisted of for some time, and that many of those responsible are, contrary to disingenuous claims to the contrary, still very much active and participating members of FCN and this site. Those are the reasons why this resolution should be backed. If someone else is a former member and has a vendetta against FCN for unrelated reasons and wants to support the resolution, I don't really care. I doubt FCN does either, they're just bringing it up as a bit of disingenuous deflection.

Fuelling anti-WA people is an idiotic term. Anti-WA people will spread their nonsense regardless of what anyone does. Even if the entire WA stood stock still and never did anything for fear of annoying those opposed to it, they'd still oppose it.

"Anti-WA people will spread their nonsense regardless of what anyone does."

Every time the WA does something stupid where it targets an innocent region, makes a blunder, or wastes time, or further faults what it should server as, it makes those comments less nonsensical.


We're not targeting an innocent region. The Resolution targets a region that is undeniably responsible for exactly the things it's accused of, as anyone who read the relevant evidence can confirm.

I fail to see how this sort of behavior faults something the WA should serve. Interregional peace and goodwill is most definitely NOT served by permitting this behavior to remain unchallenged.

Of course, someone with agreeance with FCN's views probably wouldn't feel that way, but I'm not interested in that.

If you want nonsensical commentary, you need only examine your own posts on this very thread.
Last edited by Cedoria on Tue Oct 02, 2018 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In real life I am a libertarian socialist/democratic socialist
★Comrade of the Commonwealth of Socialist States (CSS)★
Likes: Freedom of speech, Freedom of Expression, Direct Democracy, Worker Owned Cooperatives, Secularism, Anti-Theism, Freedom of civil disobediance, Libertarian Socialism, Social equity for minorities.

Dislikes: Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, Stalinism, Capitalism, American Exceptionalism, Most world leaders, Religious bigotry, Despots of virtually any kind, Imperialism, Putinism, Economic Inequality, Identity Politics, Fascism and assorted far-right movements.



Founding member of The Leftist Assembly

User avatar
Consular
Minister
 
Posts: 3026
Founded: Apr 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Consular » Tue Oct 02, 2018 8:53 pm

Spode Humbled Minions wrote:Also, I can vouch for Gagium's character

See the thing is, that means absolutely nothing.

User avatar
Cedoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5928
Founded: Feb 22, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Cedoria » Tue Oct 02, 2018 9:27 pm

Consular wrote:
Spode Humbled Minions wrote:Also, I can vouch for Gagium's character

See the thing is, that means absolutely nothing.

Indeed, it depends on the kind of character being vouched for.
In real life I am a libertarian socialist/democratic socialist
★Comrade of the Commonwealth of Socialist States (CSS)★
Likes: Freedom of speech, Freedom of Expression, Direct Democracy, Worker Owned Cooperatives, Secularism, Anti-Theism, Freedom of civil disobediance, Libertarian Socialism, Social equity for minorities.

Dislikes: Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, Stalinism, Capitalism, American Exceptionalism, Most world leaders, Religious bigotry, Despots of virtually any kind, Imperialism, Putinism, Economic Inequality, Identity Politics, Fascism and assorted far-right movements.



Founding member of The Leftist Assembly

User avatar
Prydania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1002
Founded: Nov 08, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Prydania » Tue Oct 02, 2018 9:40 pm

Against.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20189
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
New York Times Democracy

Postby Wallenburg » Tue Oct 02, 2018 10:12 pm

Undrafted, offensive liberation that clearly makes its destructive desires known? There's no acceptable reason to vote for this.
PROFESSIONAL CRITIC OF ALL THINGS GENSEC
There never has been, nor will there ever be, such thing as a wallenburger.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
PRO: GOOD || ANTI: BAD
Minister of World Assembly Affairs for The East Pacific

User avatar
Boisonia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 52
Founded: Jan 25, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Boisonia » Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:25 pm

I haven't seen the evidence to support these accusations, but I have no trouble believing them. 99 times out of 100 bigots will deny their support for bigoted views, people, and ideologies when communicating with the general public and non-bigots. I put my good faith into this resolution, and hereby declare my full support.
Inventor of the word "kinkalicious"... if that's even notable.

Canadian. Progressive liberal socialist. Agnostic. Loves Japan. INFP.

User avatar
The Sect Meces
Secretary
 
Posts: 40
Founded: Dec 11, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Sect Meces » Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:32 pm

Boisonia wrote:99 times out of 100 bigots will deny their support for bigoted views, people, and ideologies when communicating with the general public and non-bigots.


So if I say you're a bigot and you deny it does that mean there's a 99% chance you're a bigot? Logic's flawed.

On another note if I could see the evidence that'd be great!
A nation-state that recently freed themselves from the control of the Universal Union. Currently Post-Uprising.

"Freedom and guns for all!" - Governor Randall Sto

Also known as the Frontiers.

User avatar
Radimostan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Jun 13, 2016
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Radimostan » Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:41 pm

Wait, the WA is targeting conservatives now as well? I knew this was a left-leaning organization, but this is getting out of hand...

Join the region of Estaria!
Estara is a modern-tech (but we also do some past-tech RP to flesh out the history of the region), roleplay focused region. We look mainly for Slavic and German nations, but everyone is welcome!


User avatar
RiderSyl
Senator
 
Posts: 4802
Founded: Jan 16, 2014
Mother Knows Best State

Postby RiderSyl » Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:44 pm

While I'm usually a huge supporter of the newfound use for Liberation proposals, I don't think it's effective in discouraging horrible offsite behavior. Blacklisting, proscribing, and diplomatic pressuring are the correct methodologies for dealing with a situation like this.

Plus, passing a preemptive liberation using evidence that can't be publically shared on-site is a nearly impossible task. Combine that with the lack of a draft stage on the SC forum, and you're looking at a bill that's dead-on-arrival.
R.I.P. Dyakovo
Sylvia Montresor

Ashmoria
Karpathos
~ You may think I’m small, but I have a universe inside my mind. ~

User avatar
Prydania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1002
Founded: Nov 08, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Prydania » Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:51 pm

To the claims at hand...
They'd need proof. Proof is not hard to come by. Look at the KREICH liberation. If proof is not forthcoming then claims of bigotry cannot really be substantiated based off of "he said, he said."

Further? While I support the use of offensive liberations against regions that subscribe and promote murderous ideologies such as fascism and communism I cannot in good conscience support one against a conservative region. Conservatism is not equivalent to fascism, regardless of how badly some people want it to be.

Again, if proof exists that FCN is a fascist region using the conservative label as a cove? Produce said proof. Until then? Prydania remains AGIANST this resolution.

Radimostan wrote:Wait, the WA is targeting conservatives now as well? I knew this was a left-leaning organization, but this is getting out of hand...

Considering the way the vote is going? No. The WA is not targeting conservative nations.

User avatar
Cedoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5928
Founded: Feb 22, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Cedoria » Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:53 pm

Radimostan wrote:Wait, the WA is targeting conservatives now as well? I knew this was a left-leaning organization, but this is getting out of hand...


They're not conservatives, despite the name. Contact Kavagrad, who has posted on this thread, if you wish to be telegrammed the evidence.

Boisonia wrote:I haven't seen the evidence to support these accusations, but I have no trouble believing them. 99 times out of 100 bigots will deny their support for bigoted views, people, and ideologies when communicating with the general public and non-bigots. I put my good faith into this resolution, and hereby declare my full support.


Thanks for the support, but ditto for you as well if you do want to see the evidence. Having seen it myself, I'm confident you'll see you made the correct decision.
In real life I am a libertarian socialist/democratic socialist
★Comrade of the Commonwealth of Socialist States (CSS)★
Likes: Freedom of speech, Freedom of Expression, Direct Democracy, Worker Owned Cooperatives, Secularism, Anti-Theism, Freedom of civil disobediance, Libertarian Socialism, Social equity for minorities.

Dislikes: Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, Stalinism, Capitalism, American Exceptionalism, Most world leaders, Religious bigotry, Despots of virtually any kind, Imperialism, Putinism, Economic Inequality, Identity Politics, Fascism and assorted far-right movements.



Founding member of The Leftist Assembly

User avatar
Cedoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5928
Founded: Feb 22, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Cedoria » Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:54 pm

Prydania wrote:To the claims at hand...
They'd need proof. Proof is not hard to come by. Look at the KREICH liberation. If proof is not forthcoming then claims of bigotry cannot really be substantiated based off of "he said, he said."

Further? While I support the use of offensive liberations against regions that subscribe and promote murderous ideologies such as fascism and communism I cannot in good conscience support one against a conservative region. Conservatism is not equivalent to fascism, regardless of how badly some people want it to be.

Again, if proof exists that FCN is a fascist region using the conservative label as a cove? Produce said proof. Until then? Prydania remains AGIANST this resolution...



Contact Kavagrad for proof if you want to see the logs for yourself. It demonstrates pretty convincing that this is not just a conservative region, whom I would agree we shouldn't subject to liberation.
In real life I am a libertarian socialist/democratic socialist
★Comrade of the Commonwealth of Socialist States (CSS)★
Likes: Freedom of speech, Freedom of Expression, Direct Democracy, Worker Owned Cooperatives, Secularism, Anti-Theism, Freedom of civil disobediance, Libertarian Socialism, Social equity for minorities.

Dislikes: Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Liberalism, Stalinism, Capitalism, American Exceptionalism, Most world leaders, Religious bigotry, Despots of virtually any kind, Imperialism, Putinism, Economic Inequality, Identity Politics, Fascism and assorted far-right movements.



Founding member of The Leftist Assembly

User avatar
Prydania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1002
Founded: Nov 08, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Prydania » Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:55 pm

Cedoria wrote:Contact Kavagrad, who has posted on this thread, if you wish to be telegrammed the evidence.

Why can't the evidence be produced here? The Liberate KREICH thread had the evidence shared publicly.

User avatar
Kavagrad
Diplomat
 
Posts: 942
Founded: Nov 22, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Kavagrad » Wed Oct 03, 2018 12:05 am

Prydania wrote:
Cedoria wrote:Contact Kavagrad, who has posted on this thread, if you wish to be telegrammed the evidence.

Why can't the evidence be produced here? The Liberate KREICH thread had the evidence shared publicly.

It’s my understanding that a lot of the evidence on the KReich thread ended up getting heavily cut down by the mods. That’s my recollection, anyway. TG coming your way.
Claorica wrote:It's leftists like this that really warm me up to Hoppe's idea of physical removal
Sobriety & Anti-Fascism

User avatar
Prydania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1002
Founded: Nov 08, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Prydania » Wed Oct 03, 2018 12:23 am

I appreciate the screen shots. Those are very troubling, and very disturbing. I'm waiting to hear back from some other people. As someone who rushed to defend KREICH before those screenshots came to light? I want to cross all my t's and dot all my i's on this one.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads