NATION

PASSWORD

[DEFEATED] Ban on Capital Punishment

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Desmosthenes and Burke
Envoy
 
Posts: 309
Founded: Oct 07, 2017
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Desmosthenes and Burke » Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:54 am

Separatist Peoples wrote:
Bananaistan wrote:
"You wouldn't actually find any straw in a hay field. You'd want the corn field for that. Unless you were actually looking for the literal straw man, in which case I'd direct you to the vegetable fields.

"We'd question the need for the ridiculously long preamble here. And the operative clause could be significantly shortened too."


"Do I look like a farmer to you? Jeez, everybody is a critic..."


"No, you look like an agent of a left-wing hit-squad. We highly encourage you to try farming for a year or two. We hear it tends to increase civic virtue and adherence to republican values, but being the so-called liberal elite ourselves, we hypocritically have no experience therewith."

Iulia paused for a moment. "As for the resolution at hand, we are opposed in the strongest terms possible. While we agree that capital punishment ought not be lightly imposed, it is a necessary component of a just system of punishment and have nothing more to add beyond what others have already said on that topic."
香港加油!林郑月娥一定要去!自由香港万岁!五毛回家!| Carrie Lam must go! Long Live Free Hong Kong | La France pour les Français et Ceux Qu'en Veut Devenir Un.

User avatar
Araraukar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14997
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Wed Jul 18, 2018 9:53 am

Separatist Peoples wrote:"Because the punishment is inherently irreversible, and mortal criminal justice is not infallible. And because execution meets none of the components of an effective criminal justice punishment. It is purely retributive, which is a piss-poor theory upon which to run a justice system."

"It is not retributive when it is done to save resources and energy. I don't know about you, ambassador, but Araraukar shares its planet with dozens of other nations, and none of these nations, nor ours, can leave the planet to search for resources elsewhere. Resources thus being limited, individuals who have been shut out of the society already, should not have to be kept alive when all they do is use up resources and cause unnecessary expenditure of time, energy and money. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one, ambassador."

OOC: Sorry for the Spock quote, but I couldn't resist... :lol2:

"Pathos doesn't work on me, ambassador. You'd do well to find a different approach."

"Surely you understand the importance of definitions and examples, ambassador?"

"Separation from the public is a goal of criminal justice."

"Perhaps for separatists. For us the goal is to make sure the criminal cannot and will not break the law again. In the most severe cases this includes ending their life that they themselves have deemed worthless by choosing to throw away their rights of freedom."

OOC: Again, sorry, but this was too punny to not use...

"Society spends money on all of those within it's care, even those who are unsavory."

"Unsavory, I grant you, yes. Unredeemable, no."

"Imprisonment is not the same thing as isolation. This argument is intellectually dishonest."

"We were talking about the kind of inmates that cannot be let to interact with other inmates - or perhaps you consider mob justice a form of criminal justice? This, ambassador, is why I laid out the example earlier."

"If you're going to shove your things into my mouth, you gotta buy me dinner, first. Maybe just a couple drinks I dunno, its not like anybody else is offering these days."

Johan glanced at his wrist watch. "Dinner I can manage - would tonight at eight work for you? But drinks you'll have to get yourself, if you want alcoholic content; with Janis away, the anti-spendthrift committee is watching our expenses like a flock of dragons watching a dying mountain goat's last few breaths."

What does that really change but the words in the law book?

"More straw."

"So you are fine with that filling then? I guess that really solves the issue for the nations still wanting to be able to punish the most egregious offenses with death."

"Found the hay field."

"Watch out for the goats. I've been told they can be quite unwilling to give way."
- Linda Äyrämäki, acting ambassador in the absence of miss Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Coronavirus related. This too. And this. These are all jokes. This isn't. This is, again, but it's also the last one.

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 15126
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Wed Jul 18, 2018 2:21 pm

Desmosthenes and Burke wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:
"Do I look like a farmer to you? Jeez, everybody is a critic..."


"No, you look like an agent of a left-wing hit-squad.

"This is ironic on so very many levels."

We highly encourage you to try farming for a year or two. We hear it tends to increase civic virtue and adherence to republican values, but being the so-called liberal elite ourselves, we hypocritically have no experience therewith."

Bell coughs. "The C.D.S.P. is a centrist libertarian confederation of semi-autonomous territories, and I grew up on a goat farm. But we didn't buy straw. We bought hay and wood shavings for the barn. The perks of living near a sawmill."

Araraukar wrote:"It is not retributive when it is done to save resources and energy.

"Ah, so you euthanize your braindead and mentally ill, too. To save resources and energy."
I don't know about you, ambassador, but Araraukar shares its planet with dozens of other nations, and none of these nations, nor ours, can leave the planet to search for resources elsewhere. Resources thus being limited, individuals who have been shut out of the society already, should not have to be kept alive when all they do is use up resources and cause unnecessary expenditure of time, energy and money. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one, ambassador."

"Ambassador, if your argument is based on insufficent global resources, you have [i]so many worse problems, and capital punishment is likely a negligible solution. This is just...bad debate."

"Surely you understand the importance of definitions and examples, ambassador?"

"The severity of the crime is irrelevant. I wouldn't execute a jaywalker or a child molester for the same rationale."

"Separation from the public is a goal of criminal justice."

"Perhaps for separatists. For us the goal is to make sure the criminal cannot and will not break the law again. In the most severe cases this includes ending their life that they themselves have deemed worthless by choosing to throw away their rights of freedom."[/quote]

Bell clears his throat, "Preventing criminals from breaking the law, and thus harming society, falls under the classic example of separation from the public. You just made my point for me, ambassador. And I'd be willing to bet none of your criminals woke up the day before their crime and said 'Ya know, I think my life is worthless, so I'll throw away my freedom today.' This is an asinine and ignorant understanding of crime and it's motivations."

"Unsavory, I grant you, yes. Unredeemable, no."

"Incarceration is not solely about redemption. If you understood the classical considerations in criminal justice punishments, you know that the goals of criminal punishment has five recognized purposes: deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, retribution, and restitution. Execution serves only retribution and ignores the others. The classic reply, of course, is that it also serves incapacitation (inability to harm society by being isolated from it), in which I note, as I have before, that incarceration does the same.
"We were talking about the kind of inmates that cannot be let to interact with other inmates - or perhaps you consider mob justice a form of criminal justice? This, ambassador, is why I laid out the example earlier.

"Ah, ok, so you don't have any semblance of order in your prisons? If you want, I can see about sending over some literature on prison management."

Johan glanced at his wrist watch. "Dinner I can manage - would tonight at eight work for you? But drinks you'll have to get yourself, if you want alcoholic content; with Janis away, the anti-spendthrift committee is watching our expenses like a flock of dragons watching a dying mountain goat's last few breaths."

Bell just stares.
"So you are fine with that filling then? I guess that really solves the issue for the nations still wanting to be able to punish the most egregious offenses with death."

"Your underlying premise was flawed, so the propositions that follow are, ipso facto, wrong."

His Worshipfulness Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 15126
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Wed Jul 18, 2018 2:43 pm

Eternal Lotharia wrote:"And we still ban abortion because it is an act of genocide to people who have caused no harm.

"Lemme stop you right there. If you don't comply with other resolutions, why should any of us bother to consider your input here? Your nation has proved that it is willing to ignore WA law when it is inconvenient, and there is no reason to suspect you won't do so here. So, why should anybody consider your nation's input?"

His Worshipfulness Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 15126
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Wed Jul 18, 2018 2:53 pm

Eternal Lotharia wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:
"Lemme stop you right there. If you don't comply with other resolutions, why should any of us bother to consider your input here? Your nation has proved that it is willing to ignore WA law when it is inconvenient, and there is no reason to suspect you won't do so here. So, why should anybody consider your nation's input?"

" We won't allow genocide to happen in our country. You are hypocritical thus for allowing genocide."

"You didn't answer the question. If your nation refuses to abide by the laws of the General Assembly on other matters, you will as easily ignore this law. So, why should the members of the Assembly, who are compliant, consider the opposition of a member who does not? If we accommodate your nation, we cede something and you cede nothing. So, what incentive is there to engage with your delegation?"

His Worshipfulness Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 15126
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:14 pm

Eternal Lotharia wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:" We won't allow genocide to happen in our country. You are hypocritical thus for allowing genocide."

"You didn't answer the question. If your nation refuses to abide by the laws of the General Assembly on other matters, you will as easily ignore this law. So, why should the members of the Assembly, who are compliant, consider the opposition of a member who does not? If we accommodate your nation, we cede something and you cede nothing. So, what incentive is there to engage with your delegation?"

"On the contrare, we intend to repeal this legislation as soon as possible. We are only asking for if capital punishment to be banned, then ban abortion which is essentially capital punishment or murder depending on how you look at it, for murdering an unconsenting class of organisms because they don't want a child or can't bear the responsibility. Though we should note, rapists are regularly punished according to deed, sometimes torture, sometimes punishment, sometimes execution, according to what will deter them personally. We should note that this is exclusive to rapists, and treasonists. If this is done then we'll be happy and feel it is acceptable to allow both, based on consistency and not hypocrisy, and attempt to enforce it ourselves, through diplomacy or force."


"You still didn't answer my question, ambassador. Do you need me to use smaller words?"

His Worshipfulness Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Sierra Lyricalia
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 3633
Founded: Nov 29, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Sierra Lyricalia » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:25 pm

Eternal Lotharia wrote:<snip>


OOC: Dude, what he's getting at IC is that the WA bans several things your ambassador is claiming your country does to its various criminals, and therefore is completely ignoring multiple resolutions. Why would anyone negotiate with such a country? You'd be barred from even speaking at any real organization if the people you represent are that cavalier about following its rules, so in character why would anyone care what you have to say?

(We really could use a guide to effective GA roleplay, I know it...)
Last edited by Sierra Lyricalia on Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Principal-Agent, Anarchy; Squadron Admiral, The Red Fleet
The Semi-Honorable Leonid Berkman Pavonis
Author: 354 GA / Issues 436, 451, 724
Ambassador Pro Tem
Tech Level: Complicated (or not: 7/0/6 i.e. 12) / RP Details
.
Jerk, Ideological Deviant, MT Army stooge, & "red [who] do[es]n't read" (various)
.
Illustrious Bum #279


User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 15126
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:33 pm

Eternal Lotharia wrote:
Sierra Lyricalia wrote:
OOC: Dude, what he's getting at IC is that the WA bans several things your ambassador is claiming your country does to its various criminals, and therefore is completely ignoring multiple resolutions. Why would anyone negotiate with such a country? You'd be barred from even speaking at any real organization if the people you represent are that cavalier about following its rules, so in character why would anyone care what you have to say?

(We really could use a guide to effective GA roleplay, I know it...)

OOC: No I know, I am fully aware. Don't worry, ICly I'm just being a prick trying to force the WA to agree to my stuff. But yeah, a rp guide would be great. I'm not taking it really seriously.

OOC: Thats a good way to get ignored on this forum. That approach *never* works.

Eternal Lotharia wrote:"My answer was such. Would you like me to reply in baby words?" The Ambassador replied condescendingly, her associates getting nervous about her aggressiveness visibly, fidgeting slightly.


"No, you didn't. You went on a rant about your personal politics. Why should we consider your input if you won't comply to begin with? If you have nothing to compromise on, why should we compromise with your nation?"
Last edited by Separatist Peoples on Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

His Worshipfulness Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Ranbowia
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Jul 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Ranbowia » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:40 pm

Full support.

User avatar
The United Orthodox States
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Jul 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Orthodox States » Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:21 pm

United Massachusetts wrote:
(Image)
Ban on Capital Punishment
Category: Human Rights | Strength: Significant | Proposed by: United Massachusetts

Having already presented its rationale in GA 4XX, The General Assembly bans member nations from employing a penalty of death for any crime, excluding war crimes or crimes against humanity.

Standing at 188 characters, I have fit an entire resolution into a tweet. I will be accepting further suggestions, especially those that decrease this abhorrently high character count.


"This resolutuon is absurd!' Shouts Ambassador Justin, while simultaniously slamming his hands on the table, making one of his aids jump with suprise.

"Not only is it a violation of nations' sovernty, it removes one of the most effective deturrents to crime, death! Fully against this law."

OOC: You probably should define crimes against humanity.
Last edited by The United Orthodox States on Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9504
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Wed Jul 18, 2018 5:19 pm

UM, just say any crime.

Author: 1 SC and 33 GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
Toxic villainous globalist kittehs
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley (EMW); OOC unless otherwise indicated
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Dastardly villain providing free services to the community sans remuneration

User avatar
United Massachusetts
Minister
 
Posts: 2555
Founded: Jan 17, 2016
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby United Massachusetts » Wed Jul 18, 2018 5:27 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:UM, just say any crime.

OK.

User avatar
United Massachusetts
Minister
 
Posts: 2555
Founded: Jan 17, 2016
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby United Massachusetts » Wed Jul 18, 2018 5:33 pm

I'll respond to comments later, but this is now at 139 characters--fitting even the old tweet limit :lol2:

User avatar
The Aligned People
Secretary
 
Posts: 39
Founded: May 07, 2017
New York Times Democracy

Postby The Aligned People » Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:58 pm

The Aligned People vehemently rejects this proposal. It is the right of every nation to choose how they conduct their courts. It is a blatant overreach of power for any nation to try and take and wield power in another nations court system.
The Aligned People
"We cannot be separated in interest or divided in purpose. We stand together until the end."

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5966
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Corporate Police State

Postby Lord Dominator » Thu Jul 19, 2018 3:54 pm

The Aligned People wrote:The Aligned People vehemently rejects this proposal. It is the right of every nation to choose how they conduct their courts. It is a blatant overreach of power for any nation to try and take and wield power in another nations court system.

"I suggest you read up on other passed rresolutions if you feel this to be an overreach of power ambassador, this is hardly the most prying thing this Assembly has enacted.

Full support of course, love the brevity."
Dee Vytherov-Skollvaldr | Forest | TBH Major and Council Member | WA Vizier | Ambassador to the WA

User avatar
Jishwas Meme Republic
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jul 20, 2018
Iron Fist Consumerists

I object

Postby Jishwas Meme Republic » Sun Jul 22, 2018 11:23 pm

Yes I understand people have the right to live but what about those who dedicate their lives to make other's lives hell such as serial kills, rapists, pedophiles, those with extreme mental disorders who pose a threat to society etc. I personally don't think capital punishment should be used extremely often but with cases like these I think it's necessary.

User avatar
Bananaaaaa
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Aug 28, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bananaaaaa » Mon Jul 23, 2018 6:03 am

Greetings
Even though I agree with your proposal, however, the Death Penalty is imposed in the Principality only for those who had committed grievous crimes, like Child Marriages, Paedophiles, Rape, Serial Murder, and Drug Trafficking. I can not vote for it.

- The Principality
NEWS UPDATE The Principality
Law Writing equals headache, Flag has been changed, might change it in the foreseeable future. Factbook Category History updates

Real Life has been rearing again, so have been on and off again. W.A voting is really on a rare occasion, but endorsements are in full swing

User avatar
Liberimery
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 395
Founded: May 27, 2018
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Liberimery » Tue Jul 24, 2018 3:21 am

"I ask those in favor of the law, suppose it were to be enacted?" The ambassador from Liberimery asks, calmly cleaning his glasses as he does, "And then the harshest punishment of any nation shall be life without possibility of parole, would it not? As my nation has temporarily suspended the practice under concerns of ethical review we have recently encountered a matter that has not afflicted the other member states so far as I am aware in this debate. Recently one inmate in our prison system, who is serving life without parole, allegedly killed a fellow inmate who was do for release in a few months time. Apparently, it was a gang related matter. Now, thus far the course of justice has not taken place and the matter of the question of this situation is internal to my people and our say in the matter has not concerned this body. But since you wish to tell us what is moral, I pose this question: What justice can there be for the family of the man who's life was stolen from him,if there is no punishment greater than that which he is already sentenced and can only ever serve once. I don't make this plea out of emotion. I will not insult this institution with a plea to humanity or such frivolities as has been requested. I wish to ask the question the opposition dare not ask. How do we punish those we have already said will live their natural lives in our prisons when they continue commit such terrible crimes? As heinous as it is for me to say of the deceased inmate... a criminal... he is still my fellow citizen... my fellow man... and under my government my fellow is entitled to the same justice under the law as a law abiding citizen. How do I uphold that most sacred of pledges?

User avatar
United Massachusetts
Minister
 
Posts: 2555
Founded: Jan 17, 2016
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby United Massachusetts » Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:29 am

Liberimery wrote:"I ask those in favor of the law, suppose it were to be enacted?" The ambassador from Liberimery asks, calmly cleaning his glasses as he does, "And then the harshest punishment of any nation shall be life without possibility of parole, would it not? As my nation has temporarily suspended the practice under concerns of ethical review we have recently encountered a matter that has not afflicted the other member states so far as I am aware in this debate. Recently one inmate in our prison system, who is serving life without parole, allegedly killed a fellow inmate who was do for release in a few months time. Apparently, it was a gang related matter. Now, thus far the course of justice has not taken place and the matter of the question of this situation is internal to my people and our say in the matter has not concerned this body. But since you wish to tell us what is moral, I pose this question: What justice can there be for the family of the man who's life was stolen from him,if there is no punishment greater than that which he is already sentenced and can only ever serve once. I don't make this plea out of emotion. I will not insult this institution with a plea to humanity or such frivolities as has been requested. I wish to ask the question the opposition dare not ask. How do we punish those we have already said will live their natural lives in our prisons when they continue commit such terrible crimes? As heinous as it is for me to say of the deceased inmate... a criminal... he is still my fellow citizen... my fellow man... and under my government my fellow is entitled to the same justice under the law as a law abiding citizen. How do I uphold that most sacred of pledges?

"What justice is there in such retribution? What amends does it make? I fail to consider a drawn-out and tiring legal process as providing any sort of closure or justice. Confusing rage with justice is a very dangerous path to walk down; if, indeed, every human is inherently valuable by sheer virtue of their humanity, then nothingcan take away that humanity. Killing those who kill only adds to the cycle of death."
Jishwas Meme Republic wrote:Yes I understand people have the right to live but what about those who dedicate their lives to make other's lives hell such as serial kills, rapists, pedophiles, those with extreme mental disorders who pose a threat to society etc. I personally don't think capital punishment should be used extremely often but with cases like these I think it's necessary.

"If people have the right to live, then why is capital punishment a good idea? Life without parole also prevents such people from continuing to do harm. My question then--why is the death penalty neccesary?"
The Aligned People wrote:The Aligned People vehemently rejects this proposal. It is the right of every nation to choose how they conduct their courts. It is a blatant overreach of power for any nation to try and take and wield power in another nations court system.

"In the name of fundamental human rights, it is not at all an overreach."
Eternal Lotharia wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:OOC: Thats a good way to get ignored on this forum. That approach *never* works.

OOC: I'm being like the USSR or Trump Diplomats basically. Trying to be a bit unique. Though that wasn't my full intention, my apologies, it's more to set this up:

Separatist Peoples wrote:

"No, you didn't. You went on a rant about your personal politics. Why should we consider your input if you won't comply to begin with? If you have nothing to compromise on, why should we compromise with your nation?"

"Why should we comply with hypocritical resolutions. We are willing to discuss compromises and even comply, but as it stands, it is unacceptable. We are willing to negotiate for all who have an issue with this and take all of their considerations on the table, and represent them. We will work to a compromise, in fact we declare ourselves committed to finding an agreeable middle ground and forcing all to comply." Her assistants look visibly slightly less worried but still are fidgeting a bit.
"If we can find a ground that all can agree upon, that enforced morality that is not objectionable to both sides, we can preserve national integrity, sovereignty, morality, and keep the organization unified and not divided by partisan politics. We are also open to negotiating proof of our willingness and compliance with this, and that this is not some cheap trick."

"There come times where compromise is undesirable. Compromising fundamental human rights is intolerable. If a right to life exists, as we and any decent human being does, there can be no cooperation on the matter. Rights deserve protecting."

User avatar
United Massachusetts
Minister
 
Posts: 2555
Founded: Jan 17, 2016
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby United Massachusetts » Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:30 am

Eternal Lotharia wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:" We won't allow genocide to happen in our country. You are hypocritical thus for allowing genocide."

"You didn't answer the question. If your nation refuses to abide by the laws of the General Assembly on other matters, you will as easily ignore this law. So, why should the members of the Assembly, who are compliant, consider the opposition of a member who does not? If we accommodate your nation, we cede something and you cede nothing. So, what incentive is there to engage with your delegation?"

"On the contrare, we intend to repeal this legislation as soon as possible. We are only asking for if capital punishment to be banned, then ban abortion which is essentially capital punishment or murder depending on how you look at it, for murdering an unconsenting class of organisms because they don't want a child or can't bear the responsibility. Though we should note, rapists are regularly punished according to deed, sometimes torture, sometimes punishment, sometimes execution, according to what will deter them personally. We should note that this is exclusive to rapists, and treasonists. If this is done then we'll be happy and feel it is acceptable to allow both, based on consistency and not hypocrisy, and attempt to enforce it ourselves, through diplomacy or force."

"I support a ban on abortion. It is, however, infeasible. Abortion is murder, but we shan't derail the conversation with such debate."

User avatar
Liberimery
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 395
Founded: May 27, 2018
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Liberimery » Tue Jul 24, 2018 11:50 am

Ambassador, what would you do to a prisoner in that situation? One who has committed such a crime that I describe? I'd prefer to hear how it works in your nation as you seem to have the situation solved, so that I may inform my government on the proper course that this matter should take.

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 15126
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Tue Jul 24, 2018 11:58 am

Liberimery wrote:Ambassador, what would you do to a prisoner in that situation? One who has committed such a crime that I describe? I'd prefer to hear how it works in your nation as you seem to have the situation solved, so that I may inform my government on the proper course that this matter should take.

"Most correctional facilities would remove privilages, try the accused, and sentence them. Probably move them to a more secure block. Justice does not require constantly escalating punishments."

His Worshipfulness Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Excidium Planetis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7571
Founded: May 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Excidium Planetis » Sat Jul 28, 2018 11:06 am

Separatist Peoples wrote:"Justice does not require constantly escalating punishments."


"I disagree, Ambassador." Blackbourne replies. "If punishments don't escalate, there is no disincentive to commit further crimes. The only reason criminals don't usually attempt to break out of Excidian prisons is that if they do, we will just kill them afterwards."
Ex-Ambassador (deceased): Evander Blackbourne
Ex-Ambassador: Cornelia Schultz, author of GA#355 and GA#368.
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
Tier 8, 7.5 nation, according to my index.Made of nomadic fleets.


News: None. Good, right?

User avatar
Kenmoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6059
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Corporate Bordello

Postby Kenmoria » Sat Jul 28, 2018 11:21 am

Excidium Planetis wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:"Justice does not require constantly escalating punishments."


"I disagree, Ambassador." Blackbourne replies. "If punishments don't escalate, there is no disincentive to commit further crimes. The only reason criminals don't usually attempt to break out of Excidian prisons is that if they do, we will just kill them afterwards."
"There can be disincentives. if the prison system allows there to be. Loss of priveliges, longer times before release, solitary confinement and removal of visiting time can all function as good alternatives to the death penalty."
A representative democracy with a parliament of 535 seats
Kenmoria is Laissez-Faire on economy but centre-left on social issues
Located in Europe and border France to the right and Spain below
NS stats and policies are not canon, use the factbooks
Not in the WA despite coincidentally following nearly all resolutions
This is due to a problem with how the WA contradicts democracy
However we do have a WA mission and often participate in drafting
Current ambassador: James Lewitt

For more information, read the factbooks here.

User avatar
Excidium Planetis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7571
Founded: May 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Excidium Planetis » Sat Jul 28, 2018 11:45 am

Kenmoria wrote:"There can be disincentives. if the prison system allows there to be. Loss of priveliges, longer times before release, solitary confinement and removal of visiting time can all function as good alternatives to the death penalty."

"Firstly, for individuals who have already had all those privileges removed, there are no further disincentives. All prison systems have a limit to the level of punishment an inmate can be given, after which point the only disincentive can be death.

"Secondly, the very presence of such amenities in prisons functions as an incentive to commit crimes. The only way prisons can deter the poor, and therefore most likely to turn to crime, from actually committing crimes is if prisons are worse than the impoverished situations would be criminals live in. When prisons are better than the surrounding society, criminals are not afraid to face the consequences."
Ex-Ambassador (deceased): Evander Blackbourne
Ex-Ambassador: Cornelia Schultz, author of GA#355 and GA#368.
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
Tier 8, 7.5 nation, according to my index.Made of nomadic fleets.


News: None. Good, right?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads