NATION

PASSWORD

[DEFEATED] Repeal GAR#408 Ban On Secret Treaties

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.
User avatar
Jocospor
Diplomat
 
Posts: 984
Founded: Nov 24, 2015
Father Knows Best State

[DEFEATED] Repeal GAR#408 Ban On Secret Treaties

Postby Jocospor » Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:11 am

General Assembly Resolution #408 “Ban on Secret Treaties” (Category: Furtherment of Democracy; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The General Assembly,

Appreciating that General Assembly Resolution #408 (herein GAR#408) contains relevant and significant content, and was likely conceived without malice.

Concerned, however, with various aspects of GAR#408.

Noting that GAR#408 lists only the negative affects of what it terms "secret diplomacy." Wishing to clarify that such negotiations can indeed be of benefit, for reasons including but not limited to the following:

Secret alliances between various member states during wartime can often check the balance of power and lead to swifter resolutions, particularly if said alliances are being practised by member states acting defensibly; and

"Ambiguous relations" (defined as: "relations and/or diplomatic agreements that are not necessarily codified and made publicly available") between various member states can often act as a deterrent to aggressive nations, since such nations are more likely to lie dormant than risk involving themselves in what could potentially become a lost cause.

Further noting that GAR#408 concentrates only on "secret diplomacy" taking place during wartime. Understanding that "secret diplomacy" can operate in many other sectors, including but not limited to trade, and convinced that secret diplomacy has the capability to, in this instance, foster economic advantages.

Concluding that the disadvantages within GAR#408 outweigh the advantages.

Therefore, repeals GAR#408 Ban On Secret Treaties.
Last edited by Frisbeeteria on Sat Jul 14, 2018 9:29 pm, edited 5 times in total.
HAIL THE CONFEDERATION!
CONFEDERATION OF CORRUPT DICTATORS | IMPERIAL OFFICES
JOCOSPOR | CENTRAL IMPERIAL DIREKTORATE


The Shadow Cult is rising...

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21475
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Sun Jul 08, 2018 4:23 am

22 minutes ago: Bears Armed: Illegal — Proposals must be written from the viewpoint of the GA, not as addresses TO the GA; also, WA committees (such as this Judicial one) are presumed to be incorruptible -- and efficient, too -- (OOC so that authors don't have to expend some of the limited number of characters allowed in a proposal trying to explain how their committees will work; IC because the WA will not admit that its agencies could be flawed) so arguments based on potential corruption are not allowed.
Last edited by Bears Armed on Sun Jul 08, 2018 4:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Democratic Empire of Romania
Envoy
 
Posts: 233
Founded: Apr 03, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Democratic Empire of Romania » Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:12 am

No hope for it.
Played since 2017.

User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 27796
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Capitalizt

Postby Frisbeeteria » Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:48 am

Good on you for posting a discussion thread. Not-so-good on you for submitting before you posted the thread. The idea is that you post a [DRAFT] to get input, then post your legal submission.

User avatar
Jocospor
Diplomat
 
Posts: 984
Founded: Nov 24, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Jocospor » Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:04 am

[OOC: Updated, should be legal now]
HAIL THE CONFEDERATION!
CONFEDERATION OF CORRUPT DICTATORS | IMPERIAL OFFICES
JOCOSPOR | CENTRAL IMPERIAL DIREKTORATE


The Shadow Cult is rising...

User avatar
Kenmoria
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 7910
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Kenmoria » Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:48 am

Jocospor wrote:[OOC: Updated, should be legal now]


(OOC: Legal does not mean good, it is strongly advised to wait until sufficient feedback has been given before submission, to give your draft the best chance of passing. Don’t submit before a time period has passed that has allowed editing of your repeal.)
Hello! I’m a GAer and NS Roleplayer from the United Kingdom.
My pronouns are he/him.
Any posts that I make as GenSec will be clearly marked as such and OOC. Conversely, my IC ambassador in the General Assembly is Ambassador Fortier. I’m always happy to discuss ideas about proposals, particularly if grammar or wording are in issue. I am also Executive Deputy Minister for the WA Ministry of TNP.
Kenmoria is an illiberal yet democratic nation pursuing the goals of communism in a semi-effective fashion. It has a very broad diplomatic presence despite being economically developing, mainly to seek help in recovering from the effect of a recent civil war. Read the factbook here for more information; perhaps, I will eventually finish it.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22866
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Sun Jul 08, 2018 12:29 pm

Jocospor wrote:[OOC: Updated, should be legal now]

Frisbeeteria wrote:Good on you for posting a discussion thread. Not-so-good on you for submitting before you posted the thread. The idea is that you post a [DRAFT] to get input, then post your legal submission.

Fris isn't talking out of their ass. Please wait for input before rushing to submit.

Jocospor wrote:Thus, hereby:

Permits the practise of "secret diplomacy" between member states of this World Assembly; and

Clarifies that such negotiations may concern a variety of fields, to be determined on a case-by-case basis by the participating member states.

This part in particular is illegal. You cannot legislate in repeals. The only active clause may be the repeals clause.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Democratic Empire of Romania
Envoy
 
Posts: 233
Founded: Apr 03, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Democratic Empire of Romania » Sun Jul 08, 2018 10:35 pm

Kenmoria wrote:
Jocospor wrote:[OOC: Updated, should be legal now]


(OOC: Legal does not mean good, it is strongly advised to wait until sufficient feedback has been given before submission, to give your draft the best chance of passing. Don’t submit before a time period has passed that has allowed editing of your repeal.)

He has submitted one 2 months ago and called forum drafting a chance of corrupting the proposal.
Last edited by Democratic Empire of Romania on Sun Jul 08, 2018 11:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Played since 2017.

User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 27796
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Capitalizt

Postby Frisbeeteria » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:26 am

Democratic Empire of Romania wrote:He has submitted one 2 months ago and called forum drafting a chance of corrupting the proposal.

And it lost. Badly.

But at least it was legal! And no corrupting influences like "anyone else's opinions" were allowed in! So, effective business model for losing the vote. Good job, author.

User avatar
Aclion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6249
Founded: Apr 12, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aclion » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:30 am

Democratic Empire of Romania wrote:
Kenmoria wrote:
(OOC: Legal does not mean good, it is strongly advised to wait until sufficient feedback has been given before submission, to give your draft the best chance of passing. Don’t submit before a time period has passed that has allowed editing of your repeal.)

He has submitted one 2 months ago and called forum drafting a chance of corrupting the proposal.

Just the sort of secretive behaviour this resolution was designed to prevent!
A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both. - James Madison.

User avatar
Democratic Empire of Romania
Envoy
 
Posts: 233
Founded: Apr 03, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Democratic Empire of Romania » Mon Jul 09, 2018 9:24 am

It's kinda funny that Jocospor said that he has "plenty of secret alliances that are bigger than I could think of".
Played since 2017.

User avatar
Jocospor
Diplomat
 
Posts: 984
Founded: Nov 24, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Jocospor » Tue Jul 10, 2018 12:58 am

We have since amended the repeal proposal, and it has now been deemed legal by the General Secretariat.
HAIL THE CONFEDERATION!
CONFEDERATION OF CORRUPT DICTATORS | IMPERIAL OFFICES
JOCOSPOR | CENTRAL IMPERIAL DIREKTORATE


The Shadow Cult is rising...

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Tue Jul 10, 2018 7:47 am

Jocospor wrote:We have since amended the repeal proposal, and it has now been deemed legal by the General Secretariat.

Again, just as a reminder; "Legal" =/= "Good".

And this ain't good
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Democratic Empire of Romania
Envoy
 
Posts: 233
Founded: Apr 03, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Democratic Empire of Romania » Tue Jul 10, 2018 10:42 am

Grays Harbor wrote:
Jocospor wrote:We have since amended the repeal proposal, and it has now been deemed legal by the General Secretariat.

Again, just as a reminder; "Legal" =/= "Good".

And this ain't good


But he is talented in writing them.

Legal =/= Good
Played since 2017.

User avatar
Jocospor
Diplomat
 
Posts: 984
Founded: Nov 24, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Jocospor » Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:49 am

There is nothing wrong with this repeal proposal. We strongly believe here in the Confederation that secret alliances are of benefit to all political doctrines, whether such be democratic or dictatorial.

The fact that such restrictive legislation was allowed to pass in the first place shows an error in judgement of certain World Assembly member nations. This is not the first instance of this, either.
HAIL THE CONFEDERATION!
CONFEDERATION OF CORRUPT DICTATORS | IMPERIAL OFFICES
JOCOSPOR | CENTRAL IMPERIAL DIREKTORATE


The Shadow Cult is rising...

User avatar
Democratic Empire of Romania
Envoy
 
Posts: 233
Founded: Apr 03, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Democratic Empire of Romania » Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:09 pm

Jocospor wrote:There is nothing wrong with this repeal proposal. We strongly believe here in the Confederation that secret alliances are of benefit to all political doctrines, whether such be democratic or dictatorial.

The fact that such restrictive legislation was allowed to pass in the first place shows an error in judgement of certain World Assembly member nations. This is not the first instance of this, either.

You've wrote it carefully and has a well-looking aspect. We'll see how it goes at vote.
Played since 2017.

User avatar
Hiram Land
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1529
Founded: May 10, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Hiram Land » Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:21 pm

very nice proposal.

The UNOE WA Delegate (me) has approved this bill and will vote yes when this bill goes to the voting floor.

good luck!
Слава Україні!
#KyrusiaSoTrue
he/him
uwu
National Information
Unidas et Hyramalunde
Nationbuilder
Old Dispatches

Alternate: Hiramia-Omfew
_____ Hiram Land _____
Hyramas or Bust!
Thank you to Nanako Island for providing help for the signature.

Proud UFN member
RIP UNoE and UoJ

User avatar
Jocospor
Diplomat
 
Posts: 984
Founded: Nov 24, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Jocospor » Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:01 pm

We thank you for your support in this matter. Thanks to nations like your own, we're going to be able to restore the World Assembly as a judicious and moderate collective.
HAIL THE CONFEDERATION!
CONFEDERATION OF CORRUPT DICTATORS | IMPERIAL OFFICES
JOCOSPOR | CENTRAL IMPERIAL DIREKTORATE


The Shadow Cult is rising...

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:01 pm

There are two, I'll be generous, 3 arguments: (1) secret treaties may be useful at defeating a foe, (2) secret treaties produce deterrence, and (3) secret treaties may be useful at changing the terms of trade.

Argument 1 is an invitation for nations to deceive each other about what gets what out of a war, this is bad since it encourages people to overpromise. Overpromising creates ripe conditions for further conflict. The World Assembly has an ethical obligation to prevent future conflict. A body made up of persons which have ethical obligations does not absolve those persons of those obligations.

A real world example of this is Italy after the First World War, where territories from the Austro-Hungarian Empire were not transferred at war end, leading to the rise of strong nationalist movements. Similarly, there was significant conflict in the post-Great War Near East, where Arabia was engulfed in internecine warfare due to broken promises by the Entente. These kinds of issues, and the preceding issues that led to the Great War itself, are why Wilson proposed the elimination of secret diplomacy in his Fourteen points.

Argument 2 is necessarily false. You cannot deter anyone if you don't tell them. If you read Mearsheimer's treatise on deterrence, the largest factor is the expected cost incurred by an invading force. Insofar as the invading force doesn't know about costs, that doesn't appear in the decision calculus. The counterargument here is basically baiting wars. But that fails the Assembly's ethical obligation to prevent future conflict.

Argument 3 could be true if (a) nations conspiring had significant international market control and (b) you believe tariffs are good. But I'd say warrant (a) is false because NS is too large and warrant (b) sucks because tariffs are bad. There can be situations where national welfare increases with tariffs. But you need to exercise significant market control. Otherwise, deadweight loss always outweighs. And the existence of that loss means such imposition harms the nation doing so.

If you interpret it another way, like a trade agreement, that makes even less sense. How could someone effectively do trade if the government has concealed tariff rates from them? Or if the breadth of the free trade zone is unknown? Both of these create significant risk, which increases the expected costs of doing business, leading to people doing less of it. Either way, it doesn't make sense.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22866
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:26 pm

No draft, no support. Thanks for making my vote easy to decide, I guess.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Kenmoria
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 7910
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Kenmoria » Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:36 pm

"If this had been drafted for a sufficient period of time, it could have had this delegation's support. As it turns out, you did not think to do this, so we must automatically vote against."
Hello! I’m a GAer and NS Roleplayer from the United Kingdom.
My pronouns are he/him.
Any posts that I make as GenSec will be clearly marked as such and OOC. Conversely, my IC ambassador in the General Assembly is Ambassador Fortier. I’m always happy to discuss ideas about proposals, particularly if grammar or wording are in issue. I am also Executive Deputy Minister for the WA Ministry of TNP.
Kenmoria is an illiberal yet democratic nation pursuing the goals of communism in a semi-effective fashion. It has a very broad diplomatic presence despite being economically developing, mainly to seek help in recovering from the effect of a recent civil war. Read the factbook here for more information; perhaps, I will eventually finish it.

User avatar
Shaktirajya
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 164
Founded: Mar 22, 2013
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Shaktirajya » Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:09 pm

We, the People's Hindu Matriarchy of Shaktirajya, hereby vote FOR this resolution in concert with Our regional delegate Davelands. No more thought has been given to the matter. It seems to us, a fool's errand to prohibit secret treaties as they are by their very nature, secret.

Vaktaha Samajadinaha Matarajasya Shaktirajasya
Nota Bene: Even though my country is a Matriarchy, I am a dude.

Pro: Hinduism, Buddhism, polytheism, legalization of drugs and prostitution, free thought, sexual freedom, freedom of speech.

Anti: Intolerant Abrahamic religion, drug prohibition, homophobia and homomisia, prudery, asceticism.

User avatar
Jabberwocky
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1105
Founded: Nov 02, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jabberwocky » Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:30 pm

How did this thing reach a vote?
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gambol in the wabe.
All mimsy were the borogoves
And the mome raths outgrabe.

User avatar
Sciongrad
Minister
 
Posts: 3060
Founded: Mar 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sciongrad » Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:30 pm

OOC: Heads up, all. Unfortunately, we did not notice this early enough, but the repeal at vote currently misinterprets GAR#408 in violation of the honest mistake rule. The "further noting" clause states that GAR#408 focuses "only on "secret diplomacy" taking place during wartime." In fact, the resolution applies to secret diplomacy in all contexts. It only mentions war specifically in two preamble clauses, and nowhere does it limit its effects to war. The resolution, therefore, will be discarded if the voters fail to reject it.
Natalia Santos, Plenipotentiary and Permanent Scionite Representative to the World Assembly


Ideological Bulwark #271


User avatar
The United Orthodox States
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Jul 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Orthodox States » Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:34 pm

OOC: Damn.
Last edited by The United Orthodox States on Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads