NationStates

Tara Taranilor Romani wrote:

Cedoria wrote:Without proof, such accusations are worthless.

If you criticise the lead you get banned. You can't have an opinion about something, because it may be considered "fascist" by all the leaders and administrators which are too many. The best proof is me, I got banned for saying what is not allowed by the dictators. Nothing racist or offensive.

RiderSyl wrote:

California Prime wrote:LOL nice to see that the right wing penchant for playing the "victim of the big lefty conspiracy!" card is just as prevalent in NS as it is in real life.

They're also leaving out meaningful context. The vote swing in "Liberate The Conservative Christians" that they're calling "leftist corruption" happened because the region that Tinhampton was trying to Liberate was freed in the middle of the voting stage. The victims in The Conservative Christians told people they were freed. Tinhampton himself said for people to switch their votes to against so his bill wouldn't pass. Not to mention, "Liberate The Conservative Christians" was a religiously-charged issue, not a politically-charged one.

The founder of that fascist region just saw a vote swing in a bill that had "Conservative" in the title and decided to politicize it to push an agenda.

Considering all the bullshit The Iron Fortress has pulled in the past week, I'm really starting to understand why so many people love "bashing the fash".

West Leas Oros wrote:

RiderSyl wrote:
They're also leaving out meaningful context. The vote swing in "Liberate The Conservative Christians" that they're calling "leftist corruption" happened because the region that Tinhampton was trying to Liberate was freed in the middle of the voting stage. The victims in The Conservative Christians told people they were freed. Tinhampton himself said for people to switch their votes to against so his bill wouldn't pass. Not to mention, "Liberate The Conservative Christians" was a religiously-charged issue, not a politically-charged one.

The founder of that fascist region just saw a vote swing in a bill that had "Conservative" in the title and decided to politicize it to push an agenda.

Considering all the bullshit The Iron Fortress has pulled in the past week, I'm really starting to understand why so many people love "bashing the fash".

So many do, but all that shows is that they would prefer violence and would rather be close minded and refuse to engage in civil debates, resorting instead to knee jerk violence.

Kurnugia wrote:

West Leas Oros wrote:So many do, but all that shows is that they would prefer violence and would rather be close minded and refuse to engage in civil debates, resorting instead to knee jerk violence.

Raiding is not violence. Else NS would be a brutal place. Also something you forget: The Fashies love to raid. They just cannot do shit. So it's easier to play the victim card.

Cedoria wrote:

Tinhampton wrote:I also tried and failed to do what our friendly local mangrove just did (by about 45 seconds). These were the comments I made on the resolution:

This resolution hereby cond---erm, will be at vote between the 23rd and 27th of May. Nota bene: It was submitted by a nation dwelling in The Iron Fortress, self-proclaimed headquarters "for the Fascist movement on NationStates and the struggle against the Communist plague." I personally find this resolution less a condemnation of TCB from "this august body" as a condemnation of Communism itself from TIR.

In other words, it's a badly written piece of political propaganda endorsed by an out-and-out Fascist movement masquerading as a resolution.


Seriously, not even a shred of evidence is provided here that would make this condemnation worthwhile, and half the allegations are things most regions on NS will do anyway, to some extent, without condemnation. How low the Fascists of NS must stoop in their attempt to use the Security Council to victimise their enemies.

Ultramarr Nova wrote:

Cedoria wrote:
In other words, it's a badly written piece of political propaganda endorsed by an out-and-out Fascist movement masquerading as a resolution.


Seriously, not even a shred of evidence is provided here that would make this condemnation worthwhile, and half the allegations are things most regions on NS will do anyway, to some extent, without condemnation. How low the Fascists of NS must stoop in their attempt to use the Security Council to victimise their enemies.

Its you lot that target anyone that isn't a communist and those with morality with the WA

Ultramarr Nova wrote:

Cedoria wrote:
In other words, it's a badly written piece of political propaganda endorsed by an out-and-out Fascist movement masquerading as a resolution.


Seriously, not even a shred of evidence is provided here that would make this condemnation worthwhile, and half the allegations are things most regions on NS will do anyway, to some extent, without condemnation. How low the Fascists of NS must stoop in their attempt to use the Security Council to victimise their enemies.

Its you lot that target anyone that isn't a communist and those with morality with the WA

Willania Imperium wrote:

Ultramarr Nova wrote:Its you lot that target anyone that isn't a communist and those with morality with the WA

A fascist defending fascists? Why am I not surprised?