Advertisement
by Hessere » Thu May 24, 2018 4:02 pm
by Frisbeeteria » Thu May 24, 2018 4:06 pm
Hessere wrote:So, is the hate-mongering over now?
by Ransium » Thu May 24, 2018 4:13 pm
Nakayo wrote:This issue looks like it got enough votes to pass before anyone had time to check if it was a legal proposal.
Or it is just the ugliest loophole I have ever seen.
by Ransium » Thu May 24, 2018 4:14 pm
Coaequales wrote:Can we not turn the WA into a "condemn people who's politics I don't like" council? This proposal was obviously written by a pathetic right-winger who's mad he can't insult minorities on TCB RMB.
Ransium wrote: Attack the quality of the resolution all you want, but personal attacks on the author, striked or not, bring you into flaming territory. Let’s all stay away from there please.
by Imperial States of Burgh » Thu May 24, 2018 4:45 pm
by The Grene Knyght » Thu May 24, 2018 4:52 pm
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
FULLY AUTOMATED LUXURY GAY SPACE COMMUNISM
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian MoralistPRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
by South Acren » Thu May 24, 2018 4:57 pm
by RiderSyl » Thu May 24, 2018 7:40 pm
by Eco Grendina » Thu May 24, 2018 9:50 pm
by Alcohol-Related Misconduct » Fri May 25, 2018 12:11 am
Cedoria wrote:I don't see why, I didn't banject the player in my region who argued for a vote in favour of the resolution. My position and that of my region has been transparent and open in this debate from the start. Your pals in The Iron Fortress can't say the same.
by RiderSyl » Fri May 25, 2018 12:37 am
Alcohol-Related Misconduct wrote:Cedoria wrote:I don't see why, I didn't banject the player in my region who argued for a vote in favour of the resolution. My position and that of my region has been transparent and open in this debate from the start. Your pals in The Iron Fortress can't say the same.
I mean, isn't it hypocritical for a communist to call someone else a "violently intolerant fascist"?
Alcohol-Related Misconduct wrote:But if this corrupt, tyranny by majority, left-wing, SJW echo chamber wants to fight, I'm not just gonna close my eyes and think of England.
by Alcohol-Related Misconduct » Fri May 25, 2018 12:42 am
RiderSyl wrote:
There are different variants of communism.
by RiderSyl » Fri May 25, 2018 12:47 am
by Caracasus » Fri May 25, 2018 1:08 am
by Cedoria » Fri May 25, 2018 2:04 am
Alcohol-Related Misconduct wrote:Cedoria wrote:I don't see why, I didn't banject the player in my region who argued for a vote in favour of the resolution. My position and that of my region has been transparent and open in this debate from the start. Your pals in The Iron Fortress can't say the same.
I mean, isn't it hypocritical for a communist to call someone else a "violently intolerant fascist"?
Caracasus wrote:
The closest definition to communism available is a classless, moneyless and stateless society. The paths that are taken to achieve that vary wildly. Cedoria has previously advocated for something approaching Left Communism. I would imagine (and I'd have to wait and see if Cedoria would agree here) that their form of communism would have far more anarchist characteristics and likely attempt something along the lines of the implementation of grassroots participatory democracy seen in some areas of Latin America and in Spain during the Spanish Civil War. They would likely be rather disliked by Marxist Leninists for example.
Communists don't have bitter, drawn out feuds with each other because the anarchists forgot to bring the biscuits for the sixteenth time in a row.
by Cedoria » Fri May 25, 2018 2:07 am
by Caracasus » Fri May 25, 2018 2:13 am
Cedoria wrote:Alcohol-Related Misconduct wrote:
I mean, isn't it hypocritical for a communist to call someone else a "violently intolerant fascist"?
No. I've never violently persecuted anybody, so I fail to see why it should be hypocritical.Caracasus wrote:
The closest definition to communism available is a classless, moneyless and stateless society. The paths that are taken to achieve that vary wildly. Cedoria has previously advocated for something approaching Left Communism. I would imagine (and I'd have to wait and see if Cedoria would agree here) that their form of communism would have far more anarchist characteristics and likely attempt something along the lines of the implementation of grassroots participatory democracy seen in some areas of Latin America and in Spain during the Spanish Civil War. They would likely be rather disliked by Marxist Leninists for example.
Communists don't have bitter, drawn out feuds with each other because the anarchists forgot to bring the biscuits for the sixteenth time in a row.
Your basically right, lots of anarchist or council communist groups, maybe the Zapatistas in Mexico, among others. I'd consider myself a Libertarian Socialist rather than Left Communist, but my preferred form of organising it would be essential on-point with what your describing (grassroots and bottom-up, rather than top-down vanguardist elitism).
by Alcohol-Related Misconduct » Fri May 25, 2018 2:47 am
by Caracasus » Fri May 25, 2018 2:52 am
Alcohol-Related Misconduct wrote:Cedoria wrote:
That's literally not what they said. When you need to straw-man things to keep the discussion going, you've obviously lost it.
So we're playing this game again. I say communism is bad, one of you say "that's not real communism", then you say I'm straw-manning.
by RiderSyl » Fri May 25, 2018 3:30 am
Alcohol-Related Misconduct wrote:one of you say "that's not real communism"
by West Leas Oros » Fri May 25, 2018 4:51 am
Cedoria wrote:Alcohol-Related Misconduct wrote:
I mean, isn't it hypocritical for a communist to call someone else a "violently intolerant fascist"?
No. I've never violently persecuted anybody, so I fail to see why it should would agree here) that their form of communism would have far more anarchist characteristics and likely attempt something along the lines of the implementation of grassroots participatory democracy seen in some areas of Latin America and in Spain during the Spanish Civil War. They would likely be rather disliked by Marxist Leninists for example.
Communists don't have bitter, drawn out feuds with each other because the anarchists forgot to bring the biscuits for the sixteenth time in a row.
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Oros, no. Please. You were the chosen one. You were meant to debunk the tankies, not join them. Bring balance to the left, not leave it in darkness.
WLO Public News: Protest turns violent as Orosian Anarchists burn building. 2 found dead, 8 injured. Investigation continues.
by West Leas Oros » Fri May 25, 2018 5:02 am
RiderSyl wrote:Alcohol-Related Misconduct wrote:But if this corrupt, tyranny by majority, left-wing, SJW echo chamber wants to fight, I'm not just gonna close my eyes and think of England.
It's not corrupt, of course it's tyranny by majority, most of NS is left-wing, "SJW" means nothing anymore, the SC is far from an echo chamber, the SC isn't fighting you by voting down this garbage, and leave England out of this.
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Oros, no. Please. You were the chosen one. You were meant to debunk the tankies, not join them. Bring balance to the left, not leave it in darkness.
WLO Public News: Protest turns violent as Orosian Anarchists burn building. 2 found dead, 8 injured. Investigation continues.
by Cedoria » Fri May 25, 2018 5:11 am
Alcohol-Related Misconduct wrote:Cedoria wrote:
That's literally not what they said. When you need to straw-man things to keep the discussion going, you've obviously lost it.
So we're playing this game again. I say communism is bad, one of you say "that's not real communism", then you say I'm straw-manning.
by Cedoria » Fri May 25, 2018 5:14 am
West Leas Oros wrote:Cedoria wrote:No. I've never violently persecuted anybody, so I fail to see why it should would agree here) that their form of communism would have far more anarchist characteristics and likely attempt something along the lines of the implementation of grassroots participatory democracy seen in some areas of Latin America and in Spain during the Spanish Civil War. They would likely be rather disliked by Marxist Leninists for example.
Communists don't have bitter, drawn out feuds with each other because the anarchists forgot to bring the biscuits for the sixteenth time in a row.
Your region aligns itself with destructive allies, and you don’t raise a finger to stop it.
by West Leas Oros » Fri May 25, 2018 5:16 am
Cedoria wrote:West Leas Oros wrote:Your region aligns itself with destructive allies, and you don’t raise a finger to stop it.
I don't see why The Red Fleet should be prevented from attacking violent Fascist regions. But this is not an argument relevant to The Communist Bloc and this thread, since they are not a member, and not particularly friendly with The Red Fleet anyway. I've certainly got my issues with some members of some regions who align with TRF, no question about that, but they also do much good work that I support. One needn't throw out the good along with the bad.
Discuss TRF and our relations with them in another thread if you wish however, as this is veering wildly off topic.
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Oros, no. Please. You were the chosen one. You were meant to debunk the tankies, not join them. Bring balance to the left, not leave it in darkness.
WLO Public News: Protest turns violent as Orosian Anarchists burn building. 2 found dead, 8 injured. Investigation continues.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement