[DEFEATED] Liberate The Conservative Christians

[Liberis Civitatibus]

I believe that it is my job to point out when I see something wrong, and by golly I do. It is my opinion that Tinhampton is on an apparent badge hunt, and should be denied said badges. As soon as they knew I had refounded The Communal Confederacy they telegrammed me asking to repeal the liberation.

The Self-Administrative City of Tinhampton
31 minutes ago
I have two questions, sir/madam:

A. What is "The Astronomy Empire" you speak of?
B. Do I have your consent to repeal SC#244 "Liberate The Communal Confederacy?"

Tinhampton, no I don't want it repealed yet. Stop badge hunting.

Edit:

The Self-Administrative City of Tinhampton
43 minutes ago
I am not on a badge hunt - I already have two to my name. Apart from "Tinhampton isn't a very nice bloke," do you have any genuine opposition to repeal of SC#244?

For someone not on a badge hunt, you keep an awfully close eye on how many you have. Now, to this proposal. I urge delegates not to support this obvious badge hunt, even if this liberation looks like its needed. The fact that the author makes no mention of native support, nor any mention of trying to get native support, makes me think its a badge hunt coupled with the telegrams sent to me.

Perhaps, but the matter is nonetheless the need to liberate the Christian Conservatives.

[Liberis Civitatibus]

I fail to understand why people vote against this. In typical Orwellion fashion, Conservative Christians is an over abused ethnicity IRL, and so I'd assume so it is true here in Nation States.
The Conservative Christians is a region under siege. The WA have always been there liberate regions, regardless of ideology, religion, etc. from loathsome raiders, why would it stop here?

[Zone 71]

I fail to understand why people vote against this. In typical Orwellion fashion, Conservative Christians is an over abused ethnicity IRL, and so I'd assume so it is true here in Nation States.
The Conservative Christians is a region under siege. The WA have always been there liberate regions, regardless of ideology, religion, etc. from loathsome raiders, why would it stop here?

This liberation was made to prevent the region from being deleted and refounded by raiders. However, the Conservative Christians has, in the midst of this proposal's voting process, begun efforts to transfer ownership of the region to the former owners of the Conservative Region, and has started to return to its former self. These new developments essentially make this liberation null and void, as what it originally desired to do has been accomplished, and may only serve to hurt the region by leaving it vulnerable to future raids.

[Venkat]

The assembly can't be there to fight for everyone. It's purpose is not to take sides, eh?

Against

[Comlogical]

The assembly can't be there to fight for everyone. It's purpose is not to take sides, eh?

Against

The bolded text.. The SC is there to support regions that are sieged upon, thus the purpose of liberations. I respect your vote though.

[Tinhampton]

"Liberate The conservative christians" was defeated 10,516 votes to 7,717.

[Nakayo]

I was too late with reading this to change my vote but am glad it was defeated, seeing as the situation changed. I am happy the two parties came to an agreement.