NATION

PASSWORD

[DEFEATED] Condemn Democratic Empire of Romania

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Triangle And Square
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 103
Founded: Feb 06, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Triangle And Square » Wed May 09, 2018 10:10 pm

TNP's viewpoint on this:

This proposal seeks a condemnation of The Democratic Empire of Romania (DER), founder of The New Mappers Union, a region of 82 nations. The proposal sites a failure to uphold certain standards of Democracy in the region, as defined by the author, notably: The removal of elected officials from office, and, the maintenance of puppets, in the elected government, by DER. The proposal fails to provide any significant proof of these accusations, and further investigation reveals that the author of the proposal may have been ejected from the region's government because they CTE'd. This suggests the potential for a certain frivolity in the proposal. The accusations may warrant additional scrutiny from the SC in future, but at this time, there is little evidence to support a condemnation.

For this reason, the Ministry of World Assembly Affairs recommends a vote Against the proposal.
Tinfect wrote:OOC:
Absolutely not, this is a patently absurd and frankly disgusting change that I am absolutely appalled you would even suggest. Absolutely unacceptable.



He Qixinian WA Mission.

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Thu May 10, 2018 11:10 am

"Condemn Democratic Empire of Romania" was defeated 15,983 votes to 2,883.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.

User avatar
Democratic Empire of Romania
Envoy
 
Posts: 233
Founded: Apr 03, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Democratic Empire of Romania » Thu May 10, 2018 12:32 pm

Thank you for voting AGAINST !
Played since 2017.

User avatar
Willania Imperium
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1238
Founded: Feb 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Willania Imperium » Thu May 10, 2018 2:51 pm

Ransium wrote:
"Condemn Democratic Empire of Romania" was defeated 15,983 votes to 2,883.


No freaking surprise there.

Pro: Capitalism, Socialism, Technological Advances, Science, Knowledge, Environmentalism, Cooperation, Pacifism, (Soft) Communism
Con: Fascism, Radicals, (Hard) Communism, Primitive Ideas
Social Liberal
Left: 6.22
Libertarian: 0.19
Foreign Policy: Moderate Non-Interventionalist
Culture: Moderate Cultural Liberal
WILLANIA IMPERIUM
[☮] -- Copy and paste this into your signature if you are a pacifist.
If you support liberal democratic capitalism, paste this into your sig: $LFD
[_★_]_[' ]_
( -_-) (-_Q) If you understand that both Capitalism and Socialism have ideas that deserve merit, put this in your signature.

A 13.7 civilization, according to this index.

User avatar
Jocospor
Diplomat
 
Posts: 984
Founded: Nov 24, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Jocospor » Fri May 11, 2018 4:53 am

To all the Honourable Delegates of the World Assembly Security Council,

The Imperial Empire is disappointed to see that its proposal has been ousted. We hope that the international community at no point regrets its decision.

We thank the Honourable Delegates for their time, and notify all that we intend to submit more proposals to the Security Council in the future.
HAIL THE CONFEDERATION!
CONFEDERATION OF CORRUPT DICTATORS | IMPERIAL OFFICES
JOCOSPOR | CENTRAL IMPERIAL DIREKTORATE


The Shadow Cult is rising...

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22870
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Fri May 11, 2018 5:15 am

Jocospor wrote:
Erithaca wrote:To be bluntly honest, this could be sorted out within a region, without the help of the WA. The rest of the WA has nothing to do with this one region. How did such an unpopular condemnation even reach quorum?

Because this vote is not unpopular. The resolution is recognised by more than enough delegates to be perfectly legal and timely. The international community depends upon this vote passing.

Oh dear, look at that, the international community has ceased to exist. Well, it's been fun everyone, but it's time to shut down NationStates. We just can't go on now that this nation hasn't been condemned for...something.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Isvataan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 114
Founded: Mar 09, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Isvataan » Fri May 11, 2018 7:10 am

Wallenburg wrote:
Jocospor wrote:Because this vote is not unpopular. The resolution is recognised by more than enough delegates to be perfectly legal and timely. The international community depends upon this vote passing.

Oh dear, look at that, the international community has ceased to exist. Well, it's been fun everyone, but it's time to shut down NationStates. We just can't go on now that this nation hasn't been condemned for...something.


True, enough of these ridiculous condemnations

User avatar
Great New Sealand
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Dec 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great New Sealand » Sun May 13, 2018 1:46 pm

Isvataan wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:Oh dear, look at that, the international community has ceased to exist. Well, it's been fun everyone, but it's time to shut down NationStates. We just can't go on now that this nation hasn't been condemned for...something.


True, enough of these ridiculous condemnations

Yes, these are not needed. If my delegate gets declared war on because of simply voting against, then there is no point of having these as said ridiculous condemnations.
Debater.

please help me

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads